The use of multimedia in the informed consent process

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 245-256

  Jimison, Holly B ^a   Sher, Paul P ^a   Appleyard, Richard ^a   Levernois, Yvonne ^b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LeVernois and Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DECISION MAKING; INFORMED CONSENT;

EID: 0031945394     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050245     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Kaufmann CL. Informed consent and patient decision making: two decades of research. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(21): 1657-64.
2. Varricchio CG, Jassak PF. Informed consent: an overview. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1985;5:(2):95-8.
3. Sloan J. The consent form revisited. Arch Intern Med. 1993; 153:1170-2.
4. Lidz CW, Meisel A, Osterweis M, Holden JL, Marx JH, Munetz MR. Barriers to informed consent. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99(4):539-43.
5. Faden R, Beauchamp TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
6. Buchanan RGN. Enabling patients to make informed decisions. Nurs Times. 1995;91(18):27-9.
7. Little JM, Leeder S. Logic, hermeneutics, and informed consent. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(1):3-10.
8. Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Informed consent: why are its goals imperfectly realized? N Engl J Med. 1980;302:896-900.
9. Robinson G, Merav A. Informed consent: recall by patients tested postoperatively. Ann Thorac Surg. 1976;22:209-12.
10. Olver IN, Turrell SJ, Olszewski NA, Willson KJ. Impact of an information and consent form on patients having chemotherapy. Med J Aust. 1995;162(2):82-3.
11. Merz JF, Druzdzel MJ, Mazur DJ. Verbal expressions of probability in informed consent litigation. Med Decis Making. 1991;11(4):273-81.
12. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. Philadelphia, Pa: J.B. Lippincott, 1985.
13. Holt GA, Hallon JD, Hughes SE, Coyle R. OTC labels: can consumers read and understand them? Am Pharmacol NS. 1990;30:51-4.
14. Hopper KD, Ten Have TR, Hartzel J. Informed consent forms for clinical and research imaging procedures: how much do patients understand? Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 164(2):493-6.
15. Baker MT, Taub HA. Readability of informed consent forms for research in a Veterans Administration Medical Center. JAMA. 1983;250:2646-8.
16. Morrow GR. How readable are subject informed consent forms? JAMA. 1980;244:56-8.
17. Morrow GR, Bennett JM, Carpenter PJ. Informed consent to treatment in clinical trials. Biomedic Pharmacother. 1983; 37(1):10-3.
18. Grundner TM. On the readability of surgical consent forms. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:900-2.
19. Tarnowski KJ, Allen DM, Mayhall C, Kelly PA. Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms. Pediatrics. 1990;85(1):58-62.
20. Silva MC, Sorrell JM. Factors influencing comprehension of information for informed consent: ethical implications for nursing research. Int J Nurs Stud. 1984;21(4):233-40.
21. Jubelirer SJ, Linton JC, Magnetti SM. Reading versus comprehension: implications for patient education and consent in an outpatient oncology clinic. J Cancer Educ. 1994;9(1): 26-9.
22. Meade CD, Howser DM. Consent forms: how to determine and improve readability. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992;19: 1523-8.
23. Fry EA. A readability formula that saves time. J Reading. 1968;11:513.
24. Hopper KD, Lambe HA, Shirk SJ. Readability of informed consent forms for use with iodinated contrast media. Radiology. 1993;187:279-83.
25. Doak LG, Doak CC. Lowering the silent barriers to compliance for patients with low literacy skills. Promot Health. 1987;8(4):6-8.
26. Ingelfinger FJ. Informed (but uneducated) consent. N Engl J Med. 1972;287:465-6.
27. Hopper KD, Zajdel M, Hulse SF, et al. Interactive method of informing patients of the risks of intravenous contrast media. Radiology. 1994;192(1):67-71.
28. Fletcher JC, Dommel FW, Cowell D. Consent to research with impaired human subjects. IRB Rev Hum Subj Res. 1985;7(6):1-6.
29. High DM, Doole MM. Ethical and legal issues in conducting research involving elderly subjects. Behav Sci Law. 1995; 13(3):319-35.
30. Buehler DA. Informed consent and the elderly: an ethical challenge for critical care nursing. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1990;2(3):461-71.
31. Bandman EL. Tough calls: making ethical decisions in the care of the elderly. Geriatrics. 1994;49(12):46-51.
32. Weinstock R, Copelan R, Bagheri A. Competence to give informed consent for medical procedures. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1984;12(2):117-25.
33. Folstein MF, Folstein S, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-98.
34. Taub HA, Kline GE, Baker MT. The elderly and informed consent: effects of vocabulary level and corrected feedback. Exp Aging Res. 1981;7(2):137-46.
35. Miller R, Willner HS. The two-part consent form: a suggestion for promoting free and informed consent. N Engl J Med. 1974;290:964-5.
36. Janofsky JS, McCarty RJ, Folstein MF. The Hopkins Comptency Assessment Test: a brief method for evaluating patients' capacity to give informed consent. Hosp Commun Psychiatr. 1992;43(2):132-6.
37. Becker D, Kahana Z. Informed consent in demented patients: a question of hours. Med Law. 1993;12(3-5):271-6.
38. Dresser R. Mentally disabled research subjects: the enduring policy issues. JAMA. 1996;276(1):67-72.
39. Benson PR, Roth LH, Winslade WJ. Informed consent in psychiatric research: preliminary findings from an ongoing investigation. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(12);1331-41.
40. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. The MacArthur treatment competence study: mental illness and competence to consent to treatment. Law Hum Behav. 1995;19(2):105-26.
41. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Comparison of standards for accessing patients' capacities to make treatment decisions. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:1033-7.
42. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS, Mulvey EP, Fletcher K. The MacArthur treatment competence study, II: measures of abilities related to competence to consent to treatment. Law Human Behav. 1995;19(2):127-48.
43. Tancredi LR. The rights of mental patients: weighing the interests. J Healtlh Polit Policy Law. 1980;5(2):199-204.
44. Lantos J. Informed consent: the whole truth for patients? Cancer. 1993;72(suppl):2811-5.
45. Prestifilippo J, Berkman BJ, Kaufman D, et al. The ethical treatment of cancer: what is right for the patient? Cancer. 1993;suppl 72(9):2816-9.
46. Howard JM, DeMets D. How informed is informed consent? the BHAT experience. Control Clin Trials. 1981;2(4): 287-303.
47. Sutherland HJ, Meslin EM, Till JE. What's missing from current clinical trial guidelines? A framework for integrating science, ethics, and the community context. J Clin Ethics. 1994;5(4):297-303.
48. Schain WS. Barriers to clinical trials, II: knowledge and attitude of potential participants. Cancer. 1994;74(suppl 9): 2666-71.
49. Simel DL, Feussner JR. A randomized controlled trial comparing quantitative informed consent formats. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:771-7.
50. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Thiel EC, McGreal MJ, Sem FW. Do interactive computer programs to present clinical trial information affect the trial entry decision? Med Decis Making. 1992;12(4):342.
51. White DR, Muss HB, Michielutte R, et al. Informed consent: patient information forms in chemotherapy trials. Am J Clin Oncol. 1984;7(2):183-90.
52. Wager E, Tooley PJ, Emanuel MB, Wood SF. How to do it: get patients' consent to enter clinical trials. Br Med J. 1995; 311(7007):734-7.
53. DeLuca SA, Korcuska LA, Oberstar BH, Rosenthal ML, Welsh PA, Topol EJ. Are we promoting true informed consent in cardiovascular clinical trials? J Cardiovasc Nurs. 1995;9(3):54-61.
54. Rodenhuis S, van den Heuvel WJ, Annyas AA, Koops HS, Sleijfer DT, Mulder NH. Patient motivation and informed consent in a phase I study of an anti-cancer agent. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1984;20(4):457-62.
55. Goldman J, Katz MD. Inconsistency and institutional review boards. JAMA. 1982;248(2):197-202.
56. Hammerschmidt DE. Institutional review board review lacks impact on readability of consent forms for research. Am J Med Sci. 1992;304(6):348-51.
57. Tymchuk AJ, Ouslander JG, Rader N. Informing the elderly: a comparison of four methods. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986; 34(11):818-22.
58. Krynski MD, Tymchuk AJ, Ouslander JG. How informed can consent be? New light on comprehension among elderly people making decisions about enteral tube feeding. Gerontologist. 1994;34(1):36-43.
59. Dunn SM, Butow PN, Tattersall MN, et al. General information tapes inhibit recall of the cancer consultation. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(11):2279-85.
60. Sorrell JM. Effects of writing/speaking on comprehension of information for informed consent. West J Nurs Res. 1991; 13:110-22.
61. Riecken HW, Ravich R. Informed consent to biomedical research in Veterans Administration hospitals. JAMA. 1982; 248:344-8.
62. Barbour GL, Blumenkrantz MJ. Videotape aids informed consent decisions. JAMA. 1978;240:2741-2.
63. Gagliano ME. A literature review on the efficacy of video in patient education. J Med Educ. 1988;63:785-92.
64. Kieschnick T, Adler LJ, Jimison HB. 1996 Health Informatics Directory. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1996.
65. Consoli SM, Said MB, Jean J, Menard J, Plouin P, Chatellier G. Benefits of a computer-assisted education program for hypertensive patients compared with standard education tools. Patient Educ Counsel. 1995;26:343-7.
66. Hanna P, Conley-Price D, McKiel EF, Soltes D, Hogen T, Wiens D. Computer applications for staff development patient education. Methods Inf Med. 1989;28:261-6.
67. Kirby MD. Informed consent: what does it mean? J Med Ethics. 1983;9(2):69-75.
68. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Thiel EC, Sem FWC, Woermke DEH. Presenting clinical trial information: a comparison of methods. Patient Educat Counsel. 1995;25:97-107.
69. Lenert LA, Michelson D, Flowers, Bergen MR. IMPACT: An object-oriented graphical environment for construction of multimedia preference assessment instruments. Proc 19th Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:319-24.
70. Wang PL, Ennis KE. Competency assessment in clinical populations: an introduction to the Cognitive Competency Test. In: Uzzell, Gross (eds). Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention. Boston, Mass: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986.