Groundnut growth and development in contrasting environments 2. Heat unit accumulation and photo-thermal effects on harvest index

Experimental Agriculture

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 113-124

  Bell, M J ^a   Wright, G G ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031942328     PISSN: 00144797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0014479798001082     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Angus, J. F., Cunningham, R. B., Moncur, M. W. & Mackenzie, D. H. (1981). Phasic development in field crops. I. Thermal response in the seedling phase. Field Crops Research 3:365-378.
2. Bagnall, D. J. & King, R. W. (1991). Response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to temperature, photoperiod and irradiance. II. Effect on peg and pod development. Field Crops Research 26:279-293.
3. Bell, M. J. & Wright, G. C. (1998). Peanut growth and development in contrasting environments. 1. Growth and plant density responses. Experimental Agriculture 34:99-112.
4. Bell, M. J., Bagnall, D. J. & Harch, G. (1991a). Effects of photoperiod on reproductive development of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in a cool subtropical environment. II. Temperature interactions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42:1151-1161.
5. Bell, M. J., Shorter, R. & Mayer, R. (1991b). Cultivar and environmental effects on growth and development of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). I. Emergence and flowering. Field Crops Research 27:17-33.
6. Bell, M. J., Harch, G. & Wright, G. C. (1993). Environmental and agronomic effects on growth of four peanut cultivars in a subtropical environment. I. Dry matter accumulation and radiation use efficiency. Experimental Agriculture 29:473-490.
7. Bell, M. J., Roy, R. G., Tollenaar, M. & Michaels, T. E. (1994a). Importance of variation in chilling tolerance for peanut genotypic adaptation to cool, short-season environments. Crop Science 34:1030-1039.
8. 2-fixing capacity of peanut cultivars with differing assimilate partitioning characteristics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45:1455-1468.
9. Bell, M. J., Wright, G. C. & Hammer, G. L. (1992). Night temperature affects radiation use efficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Crop Science 32:1329-1335.
10. Bennett, J. M., Sinclair, T. R., Li Ma & Boote, K. J. (1993). Single leaf carbon exchange and canopy radiation use efficiency of four peanut cultivars. Peanut Science 20:1-5.
11. Boote, K. J., Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Wilkerson, G. G. & Jagtap, S. S. (1989). PNUTGRO V1.02: Technical Documentation. USA: University of Hawaii, Department of Agronomy and Soil Science, IBSNAT Project.
12. Boote, K. J., Jones, J. W. & Singh, P. (1992). Modeling growth and yield of groundnut. In Groundnut - a Global Perspective, 331-343 (Ed. S. N. Nigam). Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.
13. Flohr, Marie-Luise, Williams, J. H. & Lenz, F. (1990). The effect of photoperiod on the reproductive development of a photoperiod-sensitive groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cv. NC Ac 17090. Experimental Agriculture 26:397-406.
14. Fortanier, E. J. (1957). Control of flowering in Arachis hypogaea L. Mededelingen Van de Landbouwhogeschool Te Wageningen 57:1-116.
15. Hammer, G. L., Sinclair, T. R., Boote, K. J., Wright, G. C., Meinke, H. & Bell, M. J. (1996). A peanut simulation model. I. Model development and testing. Agronomy Journal 87:1085-1093.
16. Ketring, D. L. (1986). Physiological response of groundnut to temperature and water deficits - breeding implications. In Proceedings of an International Symposium on Agrometeorology of Groundnut, 21-26 August, 1985 at ICRISAT Sahelian Centre, Niamey, Niger, 135-143 (Eds M. V. K. Sivakumar & S. M. Virmani). Patancheru, AP, India: ICRISAT.
17. Ketring, D. L. & Wheless, T. G. (1989). Thermal time requirements for phonological development of peanut. Agronomy Journal 81:910-917.
18. Ketring, D. L., Brown, R. H., Sullivan, G. A. & Johnson, B. B. (1982). Growth physiology. In Peanut Science and Technology, 411-457 (Eds H. E. Pattee & C. T. Young). Yoakum, Texas, USA: American Peanut Research and Education Society.
19. Kiniry, J. R. (1991). Maize phasic development. In Modeling Plant and Soil Systems, American Society of Agronomy Monograph Series No. 31, 55-70 (Eds J. Hanks & J. T. Ritchie). Madison, Wisconsin USA: American Society of Agronomy.
20. Leong, S. K. & Ong, C. K. (1983). The influence of temperature and soil water deficit on the development and morphology of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 34:1551-1561.
21. McDonagh, J. F., Toomsan, B., Limpinuntana, V. & Giller, K. E. (1993). Estimates of the residual nitrogen benefit of groundnut to maize in Northeast Thailand. Plant and Soil 154:267-277.
22. Meinke, H. & Hammer, G. L. (1996). A peanut simulation model. II. Assessing regional production potential. Agronomy Journal 87:1093-1099.
23. Mohamed, H. A., Clark, J. A. & Ong, C. K. (1988). Genotypic differences in the temperature responses of tropical crops. Journal of Experimental Botany 39:1121-1128.
24. Ong, C. K. (1986). Agroclimatological factors affecting phenology of groundnut. In Proceedings of an International Symposium on Agrometeorology of Groundnut, 21-26 August, 1985 at ICRISAT Sahelian Centre, Niamey, Niger, 115-125 (Eds M. V. K. Sivakumar & S. M. Virmani). Patancheru, AP, India: ICRISAT.
25. Ong, C. K. & Squire, G. R. (1984). Response to temperature in a stand of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides S. & H.) VII. Final number of spikelets and grains. Journal of Experimental Botany 35:1233-1240.
26. Ritchie, J. T. (1991). Wheat phasic development. In Modeling Plant and Soil Systems, American Society of Agronomy Monograph Series No. 31, 31-54 (Eds J. Hanks & J. T. Ritchie). Madison, Wisconsin USA: American Society of Agronomy.
27. Roberts, E. H. & Summerfield, R. J. (1987). Measurement and prediction of flowering in annual crops. In Manipulation of Flowering, 17-50 (Ed. J. G. Atherton). London, UK: Butterworths.
28. Sanders, T. H., Schubert, A. M. & Pattee, H. E. (1982). Maturity methodology and post-harvest physiology. In Peanut Science and technology, 625-654 (Eds H. E. Pattee & C. T. Young). Yoakum, Texas USA: American Peanut Research and Education Society.
29. Sinclair, T. R. (1986). Water and nitrogen limitations in soybean grain production. I. Model development. Field Crops Research 15:125-141.
30. Williams, J. H. & Boote, K. J. (1995). Physiology and modeling-predicting the unpredictable legume. In Advances in Peanut Science, 301-353 (Eds H. E. Pattee & H. T. Stalker), Stillwater, Oklahoma USA: American Peanut Research and Education Society.
31. Williams, E. J. & Drexler, J. S. (1981). A non-destructive method for determining peanut pod maturity. Peanut Science 8:134-141.
32. Williams, J. H., Wilson, J. H. H. & Bate, G. C. (1975). The growth of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L. cv. Makulu Red) at three altitudes in Rhodesia. Rhodesian Journal of Agricultural Research 13:33-43.
33. Wood, I. M. W. (1968). The effect of temperature at early flowering on the growth and development of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19:241-251.