Major gene effects during weed evolution: Phenotypic characters cosegregate with alleles at the ray floret locus in senecio vulgaris L. (Asteraceae)

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 54-61

  Comes, H P ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; DOMINANT INHERITANCE; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC LINKAGE; HETEROZYGOTE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SEGREGATION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031939723     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/89.1.54     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott RJ, 1986. Life history variation associated with the polymorphism lor capitulum type and outcrossing rate in Senecio vulgaris L. Heredity 56:381-391.
2. Abbott RJ, 1992. Plant invasions, interspecific hybridization and the evolution of new plant taxa. Trends Ecol Evol 7:401-405.
3. Abbott RJ, Ashton PA, and Forbes DG, 1992. Introgressive origin of the radiate groundsel, Senecio vulgaris L. var. hibernicus Syme: Aat-3 evidence. Heredity 68:425-435.
4. Alexander JCM, 1979. The Mediterranean species of Senecio sections Senecio and Delphinifolius. Note R Bot Garden Edinburgh 37:387-428.
5. Allard RW, 1956. Formulas and tables to facilitate the calculation of recombination values in heredity. Hilgardia 24:235-278.
6. Barton NH and Turelli M, 1989. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annu Rev Genet 23:337-370.
7. Bradshaw HD Jr, Wilbert SM, Otto KG, and Schemske RW, 1995. Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Nature 376:762-765.
8. Broadhurst PL, 1979. The experimental approach to behavioral evolution In: Theoretical advances in behavtour genetics (Royce JR and Mos LP, eds). Alphen aan de Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff; 43-95.
9. Caballero A and Hill WG, 1992. Effects of partial in-breeding on fixation rates and variation of mutant genes. Genetics 131:493-507.
10. Caballero A, Keightley PD, and Hill WG, 1991. Strategies for increasing fixation probabilities of recessive mutanons. Genet Res 58:129-138.
11. Charlesworth B, 1984. The evolutionary genetics of life histories. In: Evolutionary ecology (Shorrocks B, ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 117-133.
12. Comes HP, 1994. Genetische Analyse phänologischer und morphologischer Unterschiede innerhalb des nahverwandten Sippenpaares Senecio vulgaris L. und S. vernalis Waldst & Kit (Asteraceae) (PhD dissertation). Heidelberg: Ruprecht-Karls-Universität.
13. Comes HP, 1995a. Genecological and isozyme studies in Senecio vernalis Waldst. & Kit. and S. vulgaris L. var. vulgaris from Central Europe and Israel. Flora 190:1-24.
14. Comes HP, 1995b. Senecio vulgaris L. subsp. denticulatus (OF Muell.) PD Sell and S. vulgaris subsp. vulgaris var. vulgaris on Jersey (Channel Islands). Watsonia 20: 205-227.
15. Comes HP and Kadereit JW, 1996. Genetic basis of speed of development in Senecio vulgaris L. var. vulgaris and subsp. denticulatus (OF Muell.) PD Sell, and Senecio vernalis Waldst & Kit. Heredity 77:544-554.
16. Coyne JA and Lande R, 1985. The genetic basis of species differences in plants. Am Nat 126:141-145.
17. 2 populations. Genetics 134: 559-570.
18. Doebley J, Stec A, and Gustus C, 1995. Teosinte branched 1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141: 333-346.
19. Edwards MD, Stuber CW, and Wendel JW, 1987. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116:113-125.
20. Fenster CB and Ritland K, 1994. Quantitative genetics of mating system divergence in the yellow monkeyflower species complex. Heredity 73:422-435.
21. Fisher RA 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. New York: Dover.
22. Ford VS and Gottlieb LD, 1989. Morphological evolution in Layia (Compositae): character recombination in hybrids between L. discoidea and L. glandulosa. Syst Bot 14:284-296.
23. Ford VS and Gottlieb LD, 1990. Genetic studies of floral evolution in Layia. Heredity 64:29-44.
24. Hill WG, 1982. Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 79: 142-145.
25. Hull P, 1974. Self-fertilisation and the distribution of the radiate form of Senecio vulgaris L. in central Scotland. Watsonia 10:69-75.
26. Kadereit JW, 1984a. The origin of Senecio vulgaris (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol 145:135-153.
27. Kadereit JW, 1984b. Studies on the biology of Senecio vulgaris L ssp. denticulatus (OF Muell) PD Sell. New Phytol 9:681-689.
28. Kimura M, 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kosambi DD, 1944. The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172-175.
30. Mather K and Jinks JL, 1982. Biometrical genetics. London: Chapman and Hall.
31. Mayr E, 1963. Animal species and evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32. Macnair MR and Cumbes QL, 1989. The genetic architecture of interspecific variation in Mimulus. Genetics 122:211-222.
33. Mitchell-Olds T, 1996. Genetic constraints on life-history evolution: quantitative-trait loci influencing growth and flowering in Ambidopsis thaliana. Evolution 50:140-145.
34. Mitchell-Olds T and Rutledge JL, 1986. Quantitative genetics in natural plant populations: a review of the theory. Am Nat 127:379-402.
35. Orr HA and Coyne JA, 1992. The genetics of adaptation: a reassessment. Am Nat 140:725-742.
36. Oxford GS, Crawford TJ, and Pernyes K, 1996. Why are capitulum morphs associated with other characters in natural populations of Senecio vulgaris (groundsel)? Heredity 76:192-197.
37. Perring FH and Sell PD, 1985: Critical supplement to the atlas of the British flora. London: T Nelson and Sons.
38. Ren Z and Abbott RJ, 1991. Seed dormancy in Mediterranean Senecio vulgaris L. New Phytol 117:673-678.
39. Rice WR, 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
40. SAS Institute Inc., 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute.
41. Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ, 1981. Biometry, 2nd ed. New York: WH Freeman.
42. Stebbins GL, 1965. Colonizing species of the native California flora. In: Genetics of colonizing species (Baker HG, ed). New York: Academic Press: 173-192.
43. Steel RGD and Torrie JH, 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Stuber CW, 1989. Isozymes as markers for studying and manipulating quantitative traits. In: Isozymes in plant biology (Soltis D and Soltis P, eds). Portland, Oregon: Dioscorides Press; 206-220.
45. Suiter KA, Wendel JF, and Case JS, 1983. LINKAGE-1: a PASCAL computer program for the detection and analysis of genetic linkage. J Hered 74:203-204.
46. Theaker AJ and Briggs D, 1992. Genecological studies of groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L) III. Population variation and its maintenance in the University Botanic Garden, Cambridge. New Phytol 121:281-291.
47. Trow AH, 1912. On the inheritance of certain characters in the common groundsel - Senecio vulgaris Linn -and its segregates. J Genet 2:239-276.
48. van Dijk H, 1985. Genetic variability in Plantago species in relation to their ecology. 2. Quantitative characters and allozyme loci in P. major. Theor Appl Genet 68:43-52.