Mitochondrial rDNA phylogeny in Xenopus

Herpetological Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 13-17

  Kobel, H R ^a   Barandun, B ^a   Thiebaud Ch H ^b  

^a Lab de Génétique   (Switzerland)

^b Dept de Zool et de Biol Animale ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031936957     PISSN: 02680130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Avise, J. C., Bowen, B. W., Lamb, T., Meylan, A. B. & Bermingham, E. (1992). Mitochondrial DNA evolution at a Turtle's pace: Evidence for low genetic variability and reduced microevolutionary rate in Testudines. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 457-473.
2. Baéz, A. M. (1996). The fossil record of the Pipidae. In The biology of Xenopus, 391-401. Tinsley, R. C. & Kobel, H. R. (Eds). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
3. Bisbee, C. A., Baker, M. A., Wilson, A. C., Hadii-Azimi, J & Fischberg, M. (1977). Albumin phylogeny for clawed frogs (Xenopus). Science 195, 785-787.
4. Carr, S. M., Brothers, A. J. & Wilson, A. (1987). Evolutionary inferences from restriction maps of mitochondrial DNA from 9 taxa of Xenopus frogs. Evolution 41, 176-188.
5. Dams, E., Hendricks, L., Van de Peer, Y., Neefs, J-M., Smits, G., Van den Bempt, J. & De Wachter, R. (1988). Compilation of small ribosomal RNA sequences. Nuc. Acids Res. 16, Supplement: r87-r173.
6. Duellman, W. E. & Trueb, L. (1986). Biology of Amphibians. New York : McGraw-Hill.
7. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies : An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
8. Felsenstein, J. (1993). PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package, version 3. 5c.) Seattle: Dept. Genetics, University of Washington.
9. Graf, J-D. (1989). Genetic mapping in Xenopus laevis: Eight linkage groups established. Genetics 123, 389-398.
10. Graf, J-D. & Kobel, H. R. (1991). Genetics of Xenopus laevis. In Methods in Cell Biology, vol. 36, 19-34. Kay, B. K. & Peng, H. B. (Eds). New York: Academic Press.
11. Graf, J-D. (1996). Molecular approaches to the phylogeny of Xenopus. In The biology of Xenopus, 379-389. Tinsley, R. C. & Kobel, H. R. (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Gutell, R. R. & Fox, G. E. (1988). A compilation of large subunit RNA sequences presented in a structural format. Nuc. Acids Res. 16, Supplement: r175-r269.
13. Higgins, D. G., Bleasby, A. J. & Fuchs, R. (1992). CLUSTAL V: Improved software for multiple sequence alignment. CABIOS 8, 189-191.
14. Hughes, M. K. & Hughes, E. (1993). Evolution of duplicate genes in a tetraploid animal, Xenopus laevis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 1360-1369.
15. Knöchel, W., Karge, E., Basner, A. & Meyerhof, W. (1986). Globin evolution in the genus Xenopus: Comparative analysis of cDNAs coding for adult globin polypeptides of X. borealis and X. tropicalis. J. Molec. Evol. 23, 211-223.
16. Kobel, H. R. (1996). Allopolyploid speciation. In The biology of Xenopus, 391-401. Tinsley, R. C. & Kobel, H. R. (Eds). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
17. Kobel, H. R. & Du Pasquier, L. (1986). Genetics of polyploid Xenopus. Trends Genet. 2, 310-315.
18. Kobel, H. R., Loumont, C. & Tinsley, R. C. (1996). The extant species. In The biology of Xenopus, 9-33. Tinsley, R. C. & Kobel, H. R. (Eds). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
19. Larson, N., Olsen, G. J., Maidak, B. L., McCaughey, M. L., Overbeek, R., Macke, T. J., Marsh, T. L. & Woese, C. R. (1993). The ribosomal database project. Nuc. Acids Res. 21, 3021-3023.
20. Martin, A. P., Naylor, G. J. P. & Palumbi, S. R. (1992). Rates of mitochondrial DNA evolution in sharks are slow compared with mammals. Nature 357, 153-155.
21. Nagae, Y., Fujii, H., Yoneyama, Y., Goto, Y. & Okazaki, T. (1988). Nucleotide sequences of the Rana catesbeiana mitochondrial small (12s) and large (16s) ribosomal RNA genes. Nuc. Acids Res. 16, 10363.
22. Post, T. & Uzzell, T. (1981). The relationship of Rana sylvatica and the mono-phyly of the Rana boylii group. Syst. Zool. 30, 170-180.
23. Roe, B. A., Ma, D-P., Wilson, R. K. & Wong, J. F-H. (1985). The complete nucleotide sequence of the Xenopus laevis mitochondrial genome. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 759-9774.
24. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular cloning, 2nd ed., New York : Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press.
25. Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor joining method : a new method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Molec. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425.
26. Springer, M. S. & Douzery, E. (1996). Secondary structure and patterns of evolution among mammalian mitochondrial 12s RNA molecules. J. Mol. Evol. 43, 357-373.
27. Swofford, D. L. (1993). PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 3.1.1.Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, II.
28. Tinsley, R. C. (1996). Evolutionary inferences from host and parasite co-speciation. In The biology of Xenopus, 403-420. Tinsley, R. C. & Kobel, H. R. (Eds). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
29. Tymowska, J. (1991). Polyploidy and cytogenetic variation in frogs of the genus Xenopus. In Amphibian cytogenetics and evolution, 259-297. Green, D. M. & Sessions, S. K. (Eds). San Diego : Academic Press.
30. Uzzell, T. (1982). Immunological relationship of western Palearctic water frogs (Salientia : Ranidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 3, 135-143.
31. Vigny, C. (1979). The mating calls of 12 species and subspecies of the genus Xenopus (Amphibia : Anura). J. Zool., Lond. 188, 103-122.