Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy: IAC task force summary

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 33-49

  Van Niekerk, Willem A ^a   Dunton, Charles J ^a   Richart, Ralph M ^a   Hilgarth, Manuel ^a   Kalo, Harubumi ^a   Kaufman, Raymond H ^a   Mango, Laurie J ^a   Nozawa, Shiro ^a   Robinowitz, Max ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cervicography; Colposcopy; Endoscopy; Speculoscopy

Indexed keywords

CANCER SCREENING; CHEMOLUMINESCENCE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COLPOSCOPY; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEVICE; ENDOMETRIUM BIOPSY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYSTEROSCOPY; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNCH BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 0031935342     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000331533     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Adock LL, Julian TM, Okagaki T, Jones TK, Prem KA, Twiggs LB, Potish RA, Philips GL: Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. FIGO-I B. Gynecol Oncol 1982;14:199-208
2. Allahverdian V, Valaitis J, Kalis O, Pearlman S: Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Reprod Med 1980; 24:1-4
3. Bayrle W: Kritische Betrachtungen zur Rate der falschnegativen Befunde in der gynäkologischen Zytologie. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1977;37:864-868
4. Beller FK, Brecht JG, Schmidt EH, Schwartz FW: Nutzen der Kolposkopie bei Krebsfrüherkennungs-Untersuchungen. Dtsch erzteblatt 1982;79:33-38
5. Berkowitz RS, Ehrmann RL, La Vizo-Mourey R, Knapp RC: Invasive cervical carcinoma in young women. Gynecol Oncol 1979;8:311-316
6. Coibion M, Autier P, Vendam P, Delobelle A, Huet F, Hertens D, Vosse M, Andry M, DeSutter P, Heimann R, Miloiu A: Is there a role for cervicography in the detection of premalignant lesions of the cervix uteri? Br J Cancer 1994;71: 125-128
7. DePunzio C, Teti G, Rosi F, Facciai V, Nuzzi FM, Weiss C, Fioretti D: Colposcopy examination: Not complementary but indispensable in preventing tumor pathology of the cervix. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1982;3:229-240
8. Dodlin-Dewailly S, Brisson J, Roy M, Fortier M, Bouchard C: Cytology cervico-vaginale et condylomes. Reproductibilité et valeur prédictive. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1991;20: 519-524
9. Helmershorst TJM, Dijkhuizen GH, Calame JJ, Kiwikkel J II, Stoik JG: The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in diagnosis of CIN. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1987;24: 221-229
10. Hilgarth M, Schultz R: Ursachen und Ausma falsch-negative Befunde in der gynäkologischen Krebsvorsorge. Der Frauenarzt 1981;22:324-327
11. Hilgarth M, Menton M: The colposcopic screening. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996;65:65-69
12. Javaheri G, Fejgin MD: Diagnostic value of colposcopy in the investigation of cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;137:588-594
13. Kåhndel K, Buchholz W, Jaeckel G: Kolposkopie und Fråhveränderungen des Zervixkarzinoms. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1981;41:263-265
14. Link M: Die Bedeutung der Kolposkopie im Rahmen der Vorsorgeuntersuchung. Der Frauenarzt 1994;35:1317
15. Link M, Link H: 2 × 9 goldene Regeln für die Zytologie. Der Frauenarzt 1996;37:1111-1115
16. Link M: Die Früherkennung des Zervixkarzinoms. Gynäkologe 1996;29:781-795
17. Lozowski MS, Yousri M, Tulebain F, et al: The combined use of cytology and colposcopy for the detection of preclinical lesions of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol 1982;26:285-291
18. Lyall H, Duncan ID: Inaccuracy of cytologic diagnosis in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN III). Acta Cytol 1995;39:50-54
19. MacGregor JE, Campbell MK, Mann EMF, Swanson KY: Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in North East Scotland shows fall in incidence and mortality from invasive cancer with concomitant rise in preinvasive disease. Br Med J 1994;308:1407-1411
20. Maggi R, Zannoni E, Ciorda G, Biraghi P, Sideri M: Comparison of repeat smear, colposcopy and colposcopically directed biopsy in the evaluation of the mildly abnormal smear. Gynecol Oncol 1989;35:294-296
21. Matsuura Y, Kawagoe T, Toki N, Sugihara K, Kashimura M: Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization. Acta Cytol 1996;40:241-246
22. Menton M, Schneider M, Neeser E, Smyczek-Gargya B: Der neue europäische Nomenkluturvorschlag im Test. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1993;254:1006-1007
23. Menton M: Untersuchungen zur Diagnostik und Therapie der zervikalen intraepithelialen Neoplasie. Habilitationsschfrift 1995, pp 79-91
24. Menton M, Schneider M, Neeser E, Risse TH, Oettling C: Colposcopic terminologies: A continuum problem. Cervix Lower Fern Genital Tract 1993;11:15-19
25. Navratil E, Burghardt E, Bajardi F, Nash W: Simultaneous colposcopy and cytology used in screening for carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet 1958;75:1292-1299
26. Raffle AE, Alden B, Mackenzie EFD: Detection rates for abnormal cervical smears: What are we screening for? Lancet 1995;345:1469-1473
27. Rylander E: Negative smears in women developing invasive cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977;56:115-118
28. Sasieni PD, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E: The National Coordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group: Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1001-1005
29. Schneider A, Sterzik K, Buck G, DeVilliers EM: Colposcopy is superior to cytology for the detection of early genital human papilloma virus infection. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71: 236-291
30. Schneider ML: Zervixkarzinoma trotz Vorsorge, Klinische und histomorphologische Untersuchungen an 255 Zervix-karzinomen der Jahre 1974 bis 1980 zur Frage eines zweiten aggresiv wachsenden Karzinomtyps. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1985;45:610-619
31. Sedlis A, Walters AT, Balin H, Hontz A, Lo Sciuto L: Evaluation of two simultaneously obtained cervical cytological smears: A comparison study. Acta Cytol 1974;18:291-296
32. Soost HJ, Bauer S: Gynäkologische Zytodiagnostik. Stuttgart, Thieme, 1990, 205-306
33. Spitzer M, Krummholz BA, Chernys AE, Seltzer V, Lightman AR: Comparative utility of repeat Papanicolaou smears, cervicography and colposcopy in the evolution of atypical Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:731-735
34. Tawa K, Forsythe A, Cove K, Saltz A, Peters HW, Watring WG: A comparison of the Papanicolaou smear and the cervigram: Sensitivity, specificity and cost analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:229-235
35. van Leeuwen AM, Ploem Zaaijer JJ, Piters WJ, Hollema H, Burger MP: The suitability of DNA cytometry for the prediction of the histological diagnosis in women with abnormal cervical smears. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:359-365