Molecular and osteological heron phylogenies: Sources of incongruence

Auk

Volumn 115, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 127-141

  McCracken, Kevin G ^a   Sheldon, Frederick H ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031932382     PISSN: 00048038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4089118     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. BLEDSOE, A. H., AND R. J. RAIKOW. 1990. A quantitative assessment of congruence between molecular and nonmolecular estimates of phylogeny. Journal of Molecular Evolution 30:247-259.
2. BLEDSOE, A. H., AND F. H. SHELDON. 1990. Molecular homology and DNA hybridization. Journal of Molecular Evolution 30:425-433.
3. BOCK, W. J. 1956. A generic review of the family Ardeidae (Aves). American Museum Novitates 1779:1-49.
4. BOCK, W. J. 1967. The use of adaptive characters in avian classification. Pages 61-74 in Proceedings XIV International Ornithological Congress (D. W. Snow, Ed.). Oxford, England, 1966. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
5. BOSQUET, J. S., H. STRAUSS, AND P. LI. 1992. Complete congruence between morphological and rbcL-based molecular phytogenies in birches and related species (Betulaceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 9:1076-1088.
6. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42:384-397.
7. CACCONE, A., AND J. R. POWELL. 1989. DNA divergence among hominoids. Evolution 43:925-942.
8. DARWIN, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London.
9. DE QUEIROZ, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Systematic Biology 42:368-372.
10. FEDUCCIA, A. 1996. The origin and evolution of birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
11. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27:401-410.
12. HANCOCK, J., AND H. ELLIOT. 1978. The herons of the world. Harper and Row, New York.
13. HENDY, M. D., AND D. PENNY. 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Systematic Zoology 38:297-309.
14. HENNIG, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics (D. D. Davies and R. Zangerl, Translators.). University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
15. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution 29:170-179.
16. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38:7-25.
17. KLUGE, A. G., AND A. J. WOLF. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics 1993:183-199.
18. LARSON, A., AND W. W. DIMMICK. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of the salamander families: An analysis of congruence among morphological and molecular characters. Herpetological Monographs 7:77-93.
19. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusettes.
20. MADDISON, W. P., AND M. SLATKIN. 1991. Null models for the number of evolutionary steps in a character on a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 45: 1184-1197.
21. MCCRACKEN, K. G., AND F. H. SHELDON. 1997. Avian vocalizations and phylogenetic signal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 94:3833-3836.
22. MICKEVICH, M. F. 1978. Taxonomic congruence. Systematic Zoology 27:143-158.
23. MICKEVICH, M. F., AND M. S. JOHNSON. 1976. Congruence between morphological and allozyme data in evolutionary inference and character evolution. Systematic Zoology 25:260-270.
24. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND W. M. FITCH. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Systematic Biology 44:64-76.
25. NIXON, K. C., AND J. M. CARPENTER. 1993. On out-groups. Cladistics 9:413-426.
26. OMLAND, K. E. 1994. Character congruence between a molecular and a morphological phylogeny for dabbling ducks (Anas). Systematic Biology 43: 369-386.
27. OWEN, R. 1866. On the anatomy of vertebrates. Longman, London.
28. PAGE, R. D. M. 1996. On consensus, confidence, and total evidence. Cladistics 12:83-92.
29. PATTERSON, C., D. M. WILLIAMS, AND C. J. HUMPHRIES. 1993. Congruence between molecular and morphological phylogenies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:153-188.
30. PAYNE, R. B., AND C. J. RISLEY. 1976. Systematics and evolutionary relationships among the herons (Ardeidae). Miscellaneous Publications of the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology 150: 1-115.
31. POE, S. 1996. Data set incongruence and the phylogeny of crocodilians. Systematic Biology 45:393-414.
32. POWELL, J. R. 1991. Monophyly/paraphyly/polyphyly and gene/species trees: An example from Drosophila. Molecular Biology and Evolution 8: 892-896.
33. PRAGER, E. M., AND A. C. WILSON. 1988, Ancient origin of lactalbumin from lysozyme: Analysis of DNA and amino acid sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 27:326-335.
34. REMANE, A. 1952. Die Grundlagen des natrlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Akademie Verlagsges, Leipzig, Germany.
35. SHELDON, F. H. 1987a. Phylogeny of herons estimated from DNA-DNA hybridization data. Auk 104:97-108.
36. SHELDON, F. H. 1987b. Rates of single-copy DNA evolution in herons. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4:56-69.
37. SHELDON, F. H. 1994. Advances in the theory and practice of DNA hybridization as a systematic method. Pages 285-297 in Molecular approaches to ecology and evolution (R. DeSalle, G. Wagner, B. Schierwater, and B. Streit, Eds.). Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
38. SHELDON, F. H., AND M. KINNARNEY. 1993. The effect of sequence removal on DNA-hybridization estimates of distance, phylogeny, and rates of evolution. Systematic Biology 42:32-48.
39. SHELDON, F. H., K. G. MCCRACKEN, AND K. D. STUEBING. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of the Zigzag Heron (Zebrilus undulatus) and Whitecrested Bittern (Tigriornis leucolophus) estimated by DNA-DNA hybridization. Auk 112:672-679.
40. SHELDON, F. H., AND L. A. WHITTINGHAM. 1997. Phylogeny in studies of bird ecology, behavior, and morphology. Pages 275-295 in Avian molecular evolution and systematics (D. Mindell, Ed.). Academic Press, New York.
41. SIBLEY, C. G., AND J. E. AHLQUIST. 1987. Avian phylogeny reconstructed from comparisons of the genetic material, DNA. Pages 95-121 in Molecules and morphology in evolution: Conflict or compromise (C. Patterson Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
42. SIBLEY, C. G., AND J. E. AHLQUIST. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
43. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? Pages 295-333 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, Eds.). Oxford University Press, New York.
44. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
45. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the humans and apes. Evolution 37:221-244.
46. WILEY, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics, Wiley Interscience, New York.
47. WILSON, A. C., S. S. CARLSON, AND T. J. WHITE. 1977. Biochemical evolution. Annual Review of Biochemistry 46:573-639.
48. ZUCKERKANDL, E., AND L. PAULING. 1965. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. Pages 97-166 in Evolving genes and proteins (V. Bryson and H. J. Vogel, Eds.). Academic Press, New York.