Auditory evoked potentials for the assessment of noise induced hearing loss

Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement

Volumn 27, Issue 48, 1998, Pages 147-153

  Fabiani, Mario ^a   Mattioni, Arianna ^a   Saponara, Maurizio ^a   Cordier, Aldo ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potentials; Hearing loss; Noise; Sport shooters

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATHLETE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; COCHLEA; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EXPLOSION; EXPOSURE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; NERVE CONDUCTION; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPORT; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NOISE INJURY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; SPORTS;

EID: 0031930842     PISSN: 01078593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Burdo S: I potenziali evocati del tronco encefalico nel normale e nel patologico: esperienza su 692 soggetti adulti. Acta Otolaringol. Ital. 1988; 9 (Suppl. 24): 31-6.
2. Chen TJ, Kiang HC, Chen SS: Effects of aircraft noise on hearing and auditory pathway function of airport employees. J Occup Med 1992; 34: 613-9.
3. Coats AC, Martin JL: Human auditory nerve action potentials and brainstem evoked responses. Effects of audiogram shape and lesion location. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 605-11.
4. Davis H, Hirsh SK, Shelnutt JB, Bowers C: Further validation of evoked response audiometry (ERA). J Speech Hear Res 1967; 10: 717-32.
5. Davis H, Hirsh SK: The audiometric utility of brainstem responses to low-frequency sounds. Audiology 1976; 15: 181-95.
6. Gerken GM, Saunders SS, Paul RE: Hypersensitivity to electrical stimulation of auditory nuclei follows hearing loss in cats. Hear Res 1984; 13: 249-59.
7. Goldstein R, Karlovich RS, Tweed TS, Kile JE: Psychoacoustic tuning curves and averaged electroencephalic responses in a patient with low frequency sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1983; 21: 613-24.
8. Gutnick HN, Goldstein R: Effect of contralateral noise on the middle components of the averaged electroencephalic response. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 231-7.
9. Hall JG: The cochlear nuclei in monkeys after dihydrostreptomycin or noise exposure. Acta Otolaryngol 1976; 81: 344-52.
10. Harker LA, Backoff P: Middle latency electric auditory responses in patients with acoustic neuromas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1981; 89: 131-6.
11. Hay S, Davis H: Slow cortical evoked potentials: interactions of auditory, vibro-tactile and shock stimuli. Audiology 1971; 10: 9-17.
12. Hoffding V, Feldman ML: Degeneration in the cochlear nerve of the rat following cochlear lesion. Brain Res 1988; 449: 104-15
13. Hyde M, Alberti P, Matsumoto N, Yao LL: Auditory evoked potentials in audiometric assessment of compensation and medicolegal patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95: 514-9.
14. Hyde ML: The effects of cochlear lesion on ABR. In: Jacobson JT ed. The Auditory Brainstem Response. London: Taylor & Francis. 1985: 133-46.
15. Jerger J, Brown D: Effect of peripheral hearing loss on interpretation of ABR results. In: Starr A. ed. Sensory evoked potentials I. An international conference on standards for auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing. Milano: Edizioni Tecniche, 1984: 71-5.
16. Keith W, Greville A: Effect of audiometric configuration on the auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 49-55.
17. Kileny P: Middle latency (MLR) and late vertex auditory evoked responses (LVAER) in central auditory disfunction. In: Pinheiro M, Musiek F eds. Assesment of central auditory disfunction: fundation and clinical correlates. Baltimore: William & Wilkins. 1985: 131-7.
18. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK: Effects of moderately-intense sound on auditory sensitivity in Rhesus monkeys: behavioural and neural observations. J Neurophysiol 1981; 46: 563-86.
19. Mattox DE: Central nervous system changes associated with noise-induced hearing loss. An electromicroscopic and freeze-fracture study of the chick nucleus magnocellularis. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: 1063-75.
20. Mc Farland WH, Vivion MC, Goldstein R: Middle components of the AER to tone pips in normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects. J Speech Hear 1977; 20: 781-9.
21. McGinn MD, Faddis BT: Auditory experience affects degeneration of the ventral cochlear nucleus in Mongolian gerbils. Hear Res 1987; 31: 235-44.
22. Montaguti M, Zanetti M, Zacchini T, Profazio A: Confronto tra i potenziali evocati del tronco (ABR) e corticali (SVR) in medicina legale. Audiol Ital 1990; 7: 243-8.
23. Morest KD, Bohne BA: Noise induced degeneration in brain and representation of inner and outer hair cells. Hear Res 1983; 9: 145-51.
24. Prasher D, Mula M, Luxon L: Cortical evoked potential criteria in the objective assessment of auditory threshold: a comparison of noise induced hearing loss with Menieräs disease. J Laryngol Otol 1993; 107: 780-6.
25. Salvi RJ, Hamernik RP, Henderson D: Discharge patterns in the cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla following noise induced asymptotic threshold shift. Exp Brain Res 1978; 32: 301.
26. Salvi RJ, Saunders SS, Gratton MA, Arehole S, Powers N: Enhanced evoked response amplitude in inferior colliculus of chinchilla following acoustic trauma. Hear. Res. 1990; 50: 245-58
27. Salvi R.J: Central components of temporary threshold shift. In: Henderson D, Hamernik RP, Dosanjh D, Mills J eds. Effects of noise on hearing. New York: Raven Press 1976: 247-60.
28. Saunders JC, Bock GR, James R, Chen CS: Effects of priming for audiogenic seizures on auditory evoked response in the cochlear nucleus and inferior Colliculus of Balb/C mice. Exp Neurol 1972; 37: 388-99.
29. Sohmer H, Freeman S, Friedman I, Lidan D: Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) latency shifts in animal models of various types of conductive and sensori-neural hearing losses. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; 111: 206-11.
30. Soucek S, Mason SM: A study of hearing in elderly using non-invasive electrocochleography and auditory brainstem response. J Otolaryngol 1987; 16: 345-53.
31. Stappells DR, Galambos R, Costello JA, Makeig S: Inconsistency of auditory middle latency and steady-state responses in infants. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 71: 289-96.
32. Starr A: Suppression of single neuron activity in the cochlear nucleus of the cat following sound stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1965; 26: 416-31.
33. Willot JF, Lu SM: Noise-induced hearing loss can alter neural coding and increase excitability in the central nervous system. Science 1982; 216: 1331-4.
34. Wood CC, Wolpaw JR: Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. II. Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 1982; 54: 25-38.
35. Yamada O, Kodera K, Yagi T: Cochlear processes affecting wave V latency of the auditory evoked brainstem response. A study of patients with sensory hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 67-80.