Helical CT versus CT arterial portography in the detection of hepatic metastasis of colorectal carcinoma

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 170, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1341-1347

  Valls, Carlos ^a   Lopez, Eva ^a   Gumà, Anna ^a   Gil, Mabel ^a   Sanchez, Anna ^a   Andía, Eduard ^a   Serra, Joan ^a   Moreno, Victor ^a   Figueras, Juan ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI DE BELLVITGE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER METASTASIS; MALE; PORTAL PHLEBOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SURGICAL ANATOMY;

EID: 0031922427     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.170.5.9574613     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Sugarbaker PH. Surgical decision making for large bowel cancer metastatic to the liver. Radiology 1990;174:621-626
2. Baker ME, Pelley R. Hepatic metastases: basic principles and implications for radiologists. Radiology 1995;197:329-337
3. Weiss L, Grundmann E, Torhorst J, et al. Haematogenous metastatic patterns in colonic carcinoma: an analysis of 1541 necropsies. J Pathol 1986;150:195-203
4. Morgan-Parkes JH. Metastases: mechanisms, pathways, and cascades. AJR 1995;164:1075-1082
5. Scheele J, Stang R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Paul M. Resection of colorectal liver metastases. World J Surg 1995;19:59-71
6. Soyer P, Levesque M, Elias D, Zeitoun G, Roche A. Preoperative assessment of resectability of hepatic metastases from colonic carcinoma: CT portography vs sonography and dynamic CT. AJR 1992;159:741-744
7. Moran BJ, O'Rourke N, Plant GR, Rees M. Computed tomographic portography in preoperative imaging of hepatic neoplasms. Br J Surg 1995;82:669-671
8. Soyer P. CT during arterial portography. Eur Radiol 1996;6:349-357
9. Heiken JP, Weyman PJ, Lee JKT, et al. Detection of focal hepatic masses: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography, and MR imaging. Radiology 1989;171:47-51
10. Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Sugarbaker PH, Murray DR, Bernardino ME. Preoperative localization of focal liver lesions to specific liver segments: utility of CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1990;176:89-94
11. Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Sugarbaker PH, Bernardino ME. Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation. Radiology 1989;172:27-34
12. Baron RL. Understanding and optimizing use of contrast material for CT of the liver. AJR 1994; 163:323-331
13. Zeman RK, Fox SH, Silverman PM, et al. Helical (spiral) CT of the abdomen. AJR 1993;160:719-725
14. Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M. Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase. Radiology 1995;197:357-363
15. Kuszyk BS, Bluemke DA, Urban, et al. Portal-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT for the detection of malignant hepatic tumors: sensitivity based on comparison with intraoperative and pathologic findings. AJR 1996;166:91-95
16. Peterson MS, Baron RL, Dodd GD III, et al. Hepatic parenchymal perfusion defects detected with CTAP: imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1992;185:149-155
17. Bluemke DA, Soyer P, Fishman EK. Nontumorous low-attenuation defects in the liver on helical CT during arterial portography: frequency, location, and appearance. AJR 1995;164:1141-1145
18. Dorfman DD, Alf E. Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals: rating-method data. J Math Psychol 1969;6:487-496
19. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989;24:234-245
20. Thompson ML, Zucchini W. On the statistical analysis of ROC curves. Stat Med 1989;8:1277-1290
21. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27:723-731
22. Paulson EK, Baker ME, Hilleren DJ, et al. CT arterial portography: causes of technical failure and variable liver enhancement. AJR 1992;159:745-749
23. Little AF, Baron RL, Peterson MS, et al. Optimizing CT portography: a prospective comparison of injection into the splenic versus superior mesenteric artery. Radiology 1994;193:651-655
24. Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Hruban RH, Sitzmann JV, Fishman EK. Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: detection and false-positive findings with helical CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1994;193:71-74
25. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986;21:720-733
26. Senéterre E, Taourel P, Bouvier Y, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1996; 200:785-792
27. Soyer P. Will ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging replace CT during arterial portography in the detection of hepatic metastases?: prologue to a promising future. Radiology 1996;201:610-611
28. Soyer P, Roche A, Gad M, et al. Preoperative segmental localization of hepatic metastases: utility of three-dimensional CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1991;180:653-658
29. Chezmar JL, Bernardino ME, Kaufman SH, Nelson RC. Combined CT arterial portography and CT hepatic angiography for evaluation of the hepatic resection candidate. Radiology 1993;189: 407-410
30. Soyer P, Lacheheb D, Levesque M. False-positive diagnoses based on CT portography: correlation with pathologic findings. AJR 1993;160:285-289
31. Small WC, Mehard WB, Langmo LS, et al. Preoperative determination of the resectability of hepatic tumors: efficacy of CT during arterial portography. AJR 1993;161:319-322
32. Soyer P, Lacheheb D, Levesque M. CT arterial portography of the abdomen: effect of injecting papaverine into the mesenteric artery on hepatic contrast enhancement. AJR 1993;160:1213-1215
33. Langmo LS, Dagher AP, Mehard WB, et al. Does CTAP prior to hepatic resection improve patient survival rates? Abdom Imaging 1994;19:317-319