Reconstructing the spatial pattern of trees from routine stand examination measurements

Forest Science

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 125-133

  Hanus, Mark L ^a   Hann, David W ^a   Marshall, David D ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Nonsimple sequential inhibition process; Pseudotsuga menziesii; Ripley's K(d); Stand visualization models; Tree coordinates

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031918657     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. BERG, A.B. 1961. Logging precommercial Douglas-fir. For. Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 19 p.
2. BESAG, J.E. 1977. Comment on "Modelling spatial patterns" by B.D. Ripley. J. R. Stat. Soc. 839:193-195.
3. BORLAND INTERNATIONAL. 1994. Borland C++, version 4.0. Borland International, Scotts Valley, CA.
4. COOPER, C.F. 1961. Pattern in ponderosa pine forests. Ecology 35:493-499.
5. CRESSIE, N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York. 900 p.
6. DANIELS, R.F. 1978. Spatial patterns and distance distributions in young seeded loblolly pine stands. For. Sci. 24:260-266.
7. DANIELS, R.F., H.E. BURKHART, G.D. SPITTLE, and G.L. SOMERS. 1979. Methods for modeling individual tree growth and stand development in seeded loblolly pine stands. Sch. For. Wildl. Resour., V. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA. Publ. FWS-1-79. 50 p.
8. DAVIS, L.S., and K.N. JOHNSON. 1987. Forest management. Ed. 3. McGraw-Hill, New York. 790 p.
9. DIGGLE, P.J. 1979. Statistical methods for spatial point patterns in ecology. P. 95-150 in Spatial and temporal analysis in ecology, Cormack, R.M., and J.K. Ord (eds.). International Co-operative Pub. House, Fairland, MD.
10. FORD, E.D., and P.J. DIGGLE. 1981. Competition of light in a plant monoculture modelled as a spatial stochastic process. Ann. Bot. 48:481-500.
11. HANN, D.W., and A. ZUMRAWI. 1991. Growth model predictions as affected by alternative sampling-unit designs. For. Sci. 37:1641-1655.
12. HANN, D.W., C.L. OLSEN, and A.S. HESTER. 1994. ORGANON user's manual: Southwest Oregon version, ed. 4.3; Western Willamette Valley version, ed. 1.3. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.
13. HANN, D.W., C.L. OLSEN, and A.S. HESTER. 1994. ORGANON user's manual: Southwest Oregon version, ed. 4.3; Western Willamette Valley version, ed. 1.3. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.
14. HANUS, M.L., and D.W. HANN. 1995. Users guide to the VIZ4ST program. Dep. For. Resour., Coll. For., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.
15. KALTENBERG, M.C. 1978. Evaluation of regeneration sampling methods: A Monte Carlo analysis using simulated stands. State of Washington Dep. of Natur. Resour., Olympia, WA. DNR Rep. 39. 50 p.
16. KENKEL, N.C. 1988. Pattern of self thinning in jack pine: Testing the random mortality hypothesis. Ecology 69:1017-1024.
17. KING, J.E. 1966. Site index curves for Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest. Weyerhaeuser, Centralia, WA. For. Pap. 8. 49 p.
18. KELLY, F.P., and B.D. RIPLEY. 1976. A note on Strauss's model for clustering. Biometrika 63(2):357-60.
19. LAESSLE, A.M. 1965. Spacing and competition in natural stands of sand pine. Ecology 46:65-72.
20. MARSHALL, D.D., J.F. BELL, and J.C. TAPPEINER. 1992. Levels-of-growing-stock cooperative study in Douglas-fir: Report no. 10 - the Hoskins study, 1963-83. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-448. 65 p.
21. MITCHELL, K.J. 1969. Simulation of the growth of even-aged stands of white spruce. Yale Univ., New Haven, CT. Sch. For. Bull. 75. 48 p.
22. MOEUR, M. 1993. Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stem-mapped data. For. Sci. 39:756-775.
23. MUNRO, D.D. 1974. Forest growth models - a prognosis. P. 7-21 in Growth models for tree and stand simulation. Fries, J. (ed.). Dep. For. Yield Res., R. Coll. For., Stockholm, Sweden. Res. Note 30. 379 p.
24. NEWNHAM, R.M. 1968. The generation of artificial populations of points (spatial patterns) on a plane. Can. For. Serv. For. Manage. Inst., Ottawa, Ont. Inf. Rep. FMR-X-10. 28 p.
25. NEWNHAM, R.M., and G.T. MALOLEY. 1970. The generation of hypothetical forest stands for use in simulation studies. Can. For. Serv. For. Manage. Inst., Ottawa, Ont. Inf. Rep. FMR-X-26. 41 p.
26. PAYANDEH, B. 1970. Comparison of methods for assessing spatial distribution of trees. For. Sci. 16:312-317.
27. PIELOU, E.C. 1959. The use of point-to-plant distances in the pattern of plant populations. J. Ecol. 47:607-613.
28. RIPLEY, B.D. 1977. Modelling spatial patterns. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 39:172-192.
29. RITCHIE, M.W., and D.W. HANN. 1985. Equations for predicting basal area increment in Douglas-fir and grand fir. For. Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. Res. Bull. 51. 9 p.
30. SCHREUDER, H.T., T.G. GREGOIRE, and G.B. WOOD. 1993. Sampling methods for multiresource forest inventory. Wiley, New York. 446 p.
31. STRAUSS, D.J. 1975. A model for clustering. Biometrika 62(2):467-475.
32. WEISE, D.R., and G.R. GLOVER. 1988. A simulation study of hardwood rootstock populations in young loblolly pine plantations. Simulation 51:112-119.