Use of the Short Form-36 to detect the influence of upper gastrointestinal disease on self-reported health status

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 221-226

  Mant, J W F ^a,b   Jenkinson, C ^a   Murphy, M F G ^a   Clipsham, K ^a   Marshall, P ^a   Vessey, M P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health status measurement; Indigestion; Oesophagitis; Short Form 36

Indexed keywords

PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INDIGESTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS; SELF REPORT; UNITED KINGDOM; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COMORBIDITY; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 0031917698     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008873930267     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Fitzpatrick R. Application of health status measures. In: Jenkinson C, ed. Measuring Health and Medical Outcomes. London: UCL Press, 1994, pp. 27-41.
2. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 Item Short Form Health Survey 1: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-483.
3. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney C, Rogers WH, Raczek A. Comparison of methods of scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995; 33: AS264-AS279.
4. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Lawrence K. Development and testing of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 summary scale scores in the United Kingdom. Results from a large scale survey and a clinical trial. Med Care 1997; 35: 410-416.
5. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D et al. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies. J Public Health Med 1997; 19: 179-186.
6. Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Garratt AM, Courts A, Russell IT. SF-36 Health Survey questionnaire: 1 reliability in two patient based studies. Qual Health Care 1994; 32:180-185.
7. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 1993; 306:1437-1440.
8. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User Manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 1994.
9. British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Formulary. British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London, 1996.
10. Fitzpatrick R. Telling patients there is nothing wrong. BMJ 1996; 313: 311-312.
11. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF 36 Health Survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 1993; 306: 1440-1444.
12. Jenkinson C, Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Gordon J. Sensitivity to change of health status measures in a randomized controlled trial: comparison of the COOP charts and the SF-36. Qual Life Res 1995; 4(1): 47-52.
13. Keoghane SR, Lawrence KC, Jenkinson CP, Doll HA, Chappel DB, Cranston DW. The Oxford Laser Prostate Trial: sensitivity to change of three measures of outcome. Urology 1996; 47(1): 43-47.