Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 83-99

  Nieschalk, Matthias ^a   Hustert, Bernhard ^a   Stoll, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Age; Distortion product; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRESBYACUSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGE FACTORS; AGING; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HAIR CELLS, OUTER; HEARING LOSS, HIGH-FREQUENCY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0031914324     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206099809072963     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Kemp D T. Stimulated acoustic emissions within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–1391
2. Hauser R, Löhle E, Pedersen P. Zur klinischen Anwendung click-evozierter otoakustischer Emissionen an der Freiburger HNO-Klinik. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1989; 68: 661–666
3. Plinkert P, Arnold R, Zenner H P. Evozierte otoakustische Emissionen zum Hörscreening bei Säuglingen. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1990; 69: 108–110
4. Kemp D T, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 93–105
5. Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 144–154
6. Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Stagner B B, Coats A C, Martin G K. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/fl ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220–229
7. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–2067
8. Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1983; 9: 79–90
9. Zwicker E, Lumer G. Evaluating travelling wave characteristics in man by an active nonlinear cochlear preprocessing model. In. Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms, J B, Allen, J L, Hall, A, Hubbard, S T, Neely, A, Tubis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1986; 250–257
10. Martin G K, Probst R, Coats A C, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Acoustic distortion products in rabbits, Il: Sites of origin revealed by suppression and pure-tone exposure. Hear Res 1987; 28: 191–208
11. Kim D O, Molnar C E, Matthews J W. Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 1704–1721
12. Brown A, Gaskill S, Williams D. Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear. Proc R Soc Lond B 1992; 250: 29–34
13. Kummer P, Janssen T, Arnold W. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2fl-f2 distortion-product oto-acoustic emission in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98(1)197–210
14. Miller M, Ort R. Hearing problems in a home for the aged. Acta Otolaryngol 1965; 59: 33–44
15. Spoor A. Presbyacusis values in relation to noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology 1967; 6: 48–57
16. ISO-1999. Acoustics–Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-induced Hearing Impairment, 2nd edn. International Standardization Organization, Geneva 1990
17. Association AS-LH. Guidelines for screening for hearing impairments and middle ear disorders. ASHA 1990; 32: 17–24, (Suppl. 2)
18. Lonsbury-Martin B, Cutler W, Martin G. Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 1749–1759
19. Burns E, Strickland E, Tubis A, Jones K. Interactions among spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. I. Distortion products and linked emissions. Hear Res 1984; 16: 271–278
20. Wier C, Pasanen E, McFadden D. Partial dissociation of spontaneous emissions and distortion products during aspirin use in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 230–237
21. Lonsbury-Martin B, Harris F, Stagner B, Hawkins M, Martin G. Distortion-product emissions in humans: Il. Relations to stimulated and spontaneous emissions and acoustic immittance in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 236: 14–28, Suppl
22. Zwicker E, Harris F. Psychoacoustical and ear canal cancellation of (2f1-f2)-distortion products. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2583–2591
23. Harris F, Probst R, Xu L. Suppression of the 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emission in humans. Hear Res 1992; 64: 133–141
24. Bray P, Kemp D T. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191–204
25. Lonsbury-Martin B L, Harris F P, Stagner B B, Hawkins M D, Martin G K. Distortion product emissions in human. I: basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 147: 3–13, (Suppl.)
26. Brown A M, Kemp D T. Suppressibihty of the 2F1-F2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37
27. Fahey P F, Allen J B. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 599–612
28. Bonfils P, Avan P, Londero A, Trotoux J, Narcy P. Objective low-frequency audiometry by distortion-product acoustic emissions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117: 1167–1171
29. Roede J, Harris F P, Probst R, Xu L. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology 1993; 32: 273–281
30. Bonfils P. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: Clinical interest. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 752–756
31. Stover L, Norton S. The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2670–2681
32. Prieve B, Falter S. COAEs and SSOAEs in adults with increased age. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 521–528
33. Kemp D T, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission coch-leography–practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1985; 15: 71–96, (Suppl.)
34. Brown A M, McDowell B, Forge A. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 1989; 42: 143–156
35. Whitehead M, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1587–1607
36. Whitehead M, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: Il. Differential physiological vulnerability. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 2662–2682
37. Smurzynski J, Leonadr G, Kim D O, Lafreniere D C, Jung M D. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired adult ears. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 116: 1309–1316
38. Martin G K, Ohlms L A, Franklin D J, Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Distortion product emissions in humans. III: Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 30–42, (Suppl. 47)
39. Bonfils P, Avan P, Londero A, Narcy P, Trotoux J. Les produits de distorsion acoustique: technique, reproductibilité, intérèt audiométrique: une nouvelle technique ďexploration clinique de ľaudition. Ann Otolaryngol 1990; 107: 224–230
40. Bonfils P, Avan P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions–values for clinical use. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118: 1069–1076
41. Yoshie N. Auditory nerve action-potential responses to clicks in man. Laryngoscope 1968; 78: 198–215
42. Portmann M, Aran J, Lug E. Electrocochleography. Laryngoscope 1971; 81: 899–910
43. Eggermont J. Stimulus-response relations for promontory-recorded compound action potentials in normal and recruiting ears. In. Evoked Electrical Activity in the Auditory Nervous System, R, Naunton. San Francisco and London, Academic Press, New York 1978; 209–219, Fernández C, (eds).
44. Eggermont J, Odenthal D, Schmidt P, Spoor A. Electrocochleography–Basic principles and clinical application. Acta Otolaryng (Stockh) 1974; 316: 1–84, Suppl
45. de Boer E. Synthetic whole-nerve action potentials in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1975; 58: 1030–1045
46. Kiang N, Moxon E. Tails of tuning curves of auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 55: 620–630
47. Evans E. Sound Perception in Mammals. Normal and abnormal functioning of the cochlear nerve. Academic Press, London 1974
48. Evans E. The sharpening of cochlear frequency selectivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea. Audiology 1975; 14: 419–442
49. Aran J. The electrocochleogram. Recent results in children and in some pathological cases. Arch Klin Exp Ohren-, Nasen-und Kehlkopfheilk (Berlin) 1971; 198: 128–141
50. Gibson W, Prasher D, Kilkenny G. Diagnostic significance of trans-tympanic electrocochleography in Ménière's disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 155–159
51. Soucek S, Mason S. A study of hearing in the elderly using noninvasive electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses. J Otolaryngol 1987; 16: 345–353
52. Dallos P. The active cochlea. J Neuroscience 1992; 12: 4575–4585
53. Libermann M, Dodds L. Single neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear Res 1984; 16: 55–74
54. Schoonhoven R, Fabius M, Grote J. Input/output curves to tone bursts and clicks in extratympanic and trans-tympanic electrocochleography. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 619–630
55. Bonfils P, Bertrand Y, Uziel A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data and presbycusis. Audiology 1988; 27: 27–35
56. Collet L, Moulin A, Gartner M, Morgon A. Age-related changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 993–997
57. Castor X, Veuillet E, Morgon A, Collet L. Influence of aging on active micromechanical properties and on the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Hear Res 1994; 77: 1–8