Short-and long-term results with implantable transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices

Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 265-268

  Snik, Ad F M ^a   Dreschler, Wouter A ^b   Tange, Rinze A ^b   Cremers, Cor W R J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONDUCTION DEAFNESS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HEARING AID; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LONG TERM CARE; NOISE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL BONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031912411     PISSN: 08864470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.124.3.265     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hakansson B, Tjellstrom A, Rosenhall U. Hearing thresholds with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction. Scand Audiol. 1984;13:3-13.
2. Hakansson B, Tjellstrom A, Rosenhall U, Carlsson P. The bone-anchored hearing aid: principles design and a psycho-acoustical evaluation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1985;100:229-239.
3. Hough JV, Vernon J, Johnson B, Dormer K, Himelick T. Experiences with implantable hearing devices and a presentation of a new device. Ann Otol Rhinol Laiyngol. 1986;95(1, pt 1):60-65.
4. Hakansson B, Tjellstrom A, Carlsson P. Percutaneous versus transcutaneous transducers for hearing by direct bone conduction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990; 102:339-344.
5. Hakansson B, Liden B, Tjellstrom A, et al. Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laiyngol. 1990;99(suppl151):1-16.
6. Browning GG. The British experience of an implantable, subcutaneous bone-conduction hearing aid (Xomed Audiant). J Laryngol Otol. 1990;104:534-538.
7. Bonding P, Holm Jonsson M, Salomon G, Algren P. The bone-anchored hearing aid: osseointegration and audiological effect. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1992; 112(suppl 492):42-45.
8. Zuidema T, Van den Berg R, Dreschler WA, Tange RA. Implantable bone conductors: Dutch experiences with a transcutaneous device. Semin Hear. 1992; 13:347-356.
9. van der Hulst RJAM, Dreschler WA, Tange RA. Experiences with an implantable bone-conduction hearing aid. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;250:69-72.
10. Snik AFM, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids: audiologic results and the patients' opinions. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995;28:73-83.
11. Cooper H, Burrell S, Powell R, Proops DW, Bickerton J. The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: referrals, selection, rehabilitation, philosophy and adult results J Laryngol Otol. 1997;110(suppl 21):13-20.
12. Wade PS, Halik JJ, Chasin M. Bone-conduction implants: transcutaneous versus percutaneous. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;106:68-74.
13. Plomp R, Mimpen AM. Improving the reliability of testing the speech perception threshold for sentences. Audiology. 1979;18:43-52.
14. Mylanus EAM, Snik AFM, Cremers CWRJ. Patient's opinions of bone anchored vs conventional hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121:421-425.
15. Gatehouse S, Browning GG. The output characteristics of an implanted bone-conduction prosthesis. Clin Otolaryngol. 1990;15:503-513.
16. Mylanus EAM, Cremers CW, Snik AF, van den Berge NW Clinical results of percutaneous implants in the temporal bone. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994; 120:81-85.