CODE: A deconvolution program implementing a regularization method of deconvolution constrained to non-negative values. Description and pilot evaluation

Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 39-53

  Hovorka, Roman ^a   Chappell, Michael J ^b   Godfrey, Keith R ^b   Madden, Francis N ^b   Rouse, Martin K ^b   Soons, Paul A ^c,d  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^c GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

^d JANSSEN RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Deconvolution; Evaluation methodology; Input function; Regularization

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVALUATION STUDIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHARMACOKINETICS; PILOT PROJECTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0031908782     PISSN: 01422782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-081X(199801)19:1<39::AID-BDD73>3.0.CO;2-M     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. D.P. Vaughan and M. Dennis, Mathematical basis of point-area deconvolution method for determining in vivo input functions. J. Pharm. Sci., 67, 663-665 (1978).
2. D. Verotta, Two constrained deconvolution methods using spline functions. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 21, 609-636 (1993).
3. D.J. Cutler, Numerical deconvolution by least squares: use of polynomials to represent the input function. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 6, 243-263 (1978).
4. D.J. Cutler, Numerical deconvolution using least squares: use of prescribed input functions. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 6, 227-241 (1978).
5. S. Vajda, K.R, Godfrey and P. Valko, Numerical deconvolution using system identification methods. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 16, 85-107 (1988).
6. P. Veng-Pedersen and N.B. Modi, An algorithm for constrained deconvolution based on reparametrization. J. Pharm. Sci., 81, 175-180 (1992).
7. M.K. Charter and S.F. Gull, Maximum entropy and its application to the calculation of drug absorption rates. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 15, 645-655 (1987).
8. D.L. Phillips, A technique for the numerical solution of certain integral equations of the first kind. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 9, 97-101 (1962).
9. S. Twomey, The application of numerical filtering to the solution of integral equations encountered in indirect sensing measurements. J. Franklin Inst., 279, 95-109 (1965).
10. F.N. Madden, K.R. Godfrey, M.J. Chappell, R. Hovorka and R.A. Bates, A comparison of six deconvolution techniques. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 24, 283-299 (1996).
11. G. De Nicolao and D. Liberati, Linear and nonlinear techniques for the deconvolution of hormone time-series. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., BME-40, 440-455 (1993).
12. B.S. Gottfried and J. Weisman, Introduction to Optimization Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.
13. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling and B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
14. P.C. Hansen and D.P. O'Leary, The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 14, 1487-1503 (1993).
15. H.W, Engl and W. Grever, Using the L-curve for determining optimal regularization parameters. Numer. Math., 69, 25-31 (1994).
16. L.Y. Chen, J.T. Chen, H.K. Hong and C.H. Chen, Application of cesaro mean and the L-curve for the deconvolution problem. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 14, 361-373 (1995).
17. L. Kaufman and A. Neumaier, PET regularization by envelope guided conjugate gradients. IEEE Tram. Med. Imaging, MI-15, 385-389 (1996).
18. C.R. Vogel, Non-convergence of the L-curve regularization parameter selection method. Inverse Problems, 12, 535-547 (1996).
19. M. Hanke, Limitations of the L-curve method in ill-posed problems. Bit, 36, 287-301 (1996).
20. D. Commenges, The deconvolution problem: fast algorithms including the preconditioned conjugate-gradient to compute a MAP estimator. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., AC-29, 229-243 (1984).
21. C. Wahba, Constrained regularization for ill posed linear operator equations, with applications in meteorology and medicine. In Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics III, S.S. Gupta and J.O. Berger (Eds), Academic, New York, 1982, pp. 383-418.
22. B.R. Hunt, Biased estimation for nonparametric identification of linear systems. Math. Biosci., 10, 215-237 (1971).
23. G. De Nicolao, Nonparametric deconvolution of physiological systems: a stochastic approach. In Modeling and Control in Biomedical Systems. Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium, B.W. Patterson (Ed), Omnipress, Madison, 1994, pp. 252-253.
24. D.M. Goodman and D.R. Yu, Deconvolution identification techniques for nonnegative signals. In Proceedings of ICASSP, Vol. IV, 1992, pp. 153-156.
25. F. Langenbucher, Numerical convolution deconvolution as a tool for correlation in vitro with in vivo drug availability. Pharm. Ind., 44, 1166-1172 (1982).