Concentric needle recording characteristics related to depth of tissue penetration

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology - Electromyography and Motor Control

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 124-134

  Dumitru, Daniel ^a   King, John C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Concentric electrode; Instrumentation; Modeling; Motor unit action potential; Volume conduction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPOLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MOTOR UNIT; MOTOR UNIT POTENTIAL; MUSCLE TISSUE; NEEDLE; PERMEABILITY; PHYSICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING;

ADULT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROELECTRODES; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR NEURONS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEEDLES;

EID: 0031899064     PISSN: 0924980X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0924-980X(98)00003-4     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Buchthal F., Rosenfalck P. Action potential parameters in different human muscles. Acta Psychiatr. Neurol. Scand. 30:1955;125-131.
2. Butler B.P., Ball R.D., Albers J.W. Effect of electrode type and position on motor unit action potential configuration. Muscle Nerve. 5:1982;S95-S97.
3. Dumitru D., Jewett D.L. Far-field potentials. Muscle Nerve. 16:1993;237-254.
4. Dumitru, D., King, J.C. and Nandedkar, S.D. Concentric/monopolar needle electrode modeling: spatial recording territory and physiologic implications. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1997a, 105: 370-378.
5. Dumitru, D., King, J.C. and Nandedkar, S.D. Motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric needle electrodes. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1997b, 105: 333-339.
6. Dumitru, D., King, J.C. and Nandedkar, S.D. Comparison of single fiber and macro electrode recordings: relationship to motor unit action potential duration. Muscle Nerve, 1997c, 20: 1381-1388.
7. Gootzen, T.H.J.M. Muscle fibre and motor unit action potentials: a biophysical basis for clinical electromyography. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1990.
8. Henneberg K.-A., Plonsey R. Boundary element analysis of the direction sensitivity of the concentric EMG electrode. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40:1993;621-631.
9. King J.C., Dumitru D., Nandedkar S.D. Concentric and single fiber electrode spatial recording characteristics. Muscle Nerve, 20:1997;1525-1533.
10. Nandedkar, S.D., Sanders, D.B. and Stalberg, E.V. Selectivity of electromyographic recording techniques: a simulation study. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 1985a, 22: 536-540.
11. Nandedkar, S.D., Stalberg, E.V. and Sanders, D.B. Simulation techniques in electromyography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1985b, 32: 775-785.
12. Nandedkar S.D., Sanders D.B., Stalberg E.V., Andreassen S. Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. Muscle Nerve. 11:1988;151-159.
13. Nandedkar S.D., Dumitru D., King J.C. Concentric needle electrode duration measurement and uptake area. Muscle Nerve. 20:1997;1225-1228.
14. Plonsey, R. and Fleming, D.G. Bioelectric Phenomena. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969, pp. 208-209.
15. Stalberg E., Andreassen S., Falck B., Lang H., Rosenfalck A., Trojaborg W. Quantitative analysis of individual motor unit potentials: a proposition for standardized terminology and criteria measurement. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 3:1986;313-348.
16. Stalberg E., Nandedkar S.D., Sanders D.B., Falck B. Quantitative motor unit potential analysis. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 13:1996;401-422.
17. Thiele B., Bohle A. Anzhal der spike-komponenten im motor unit potential. Z EEG EMG. 9:1978;125-130.