Sampling in forensic comparison problems

Science and Justice - Journal of the Forensic Science Society

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 101-107

  Curran, J M ^a   Triggs, C M ^a   Buckleton, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b MT ALBERT RESEARCH CENTRE   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Comparison; Evidence; Forensic science; Glass; Sampling; Statistics

Indexed keywords

ELEMENT; GLASS;

ARTICLE; CLOTHING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRIME; FORENSIC SCIENCE; MATERIALS; OFFENDER; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY; SAMPLING; VICTIM;

EID: 0031898724     PISSN: 13550306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72086-6     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Bates JW and Lambert JA. Use of the hypergeometric distribution in forensic glass comparison. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 1991; 314: 449-455.
2. Lambert JA, Satterthwaite MJ and Harrison PH. A survey of glass fragments recovered from clothing of persons suspected of involvement in crime. Science & Justice 1995; 35: 273-281.
3. McQuillan J and Edgar KA. Survey of the distribution of glass on clothing. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 1992; 32: 333-348.
4. Bernado JM and Smith AFM. Bayesian Inference. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1994.