Genetic diversity at a single locus under viability selection and facultative apomixis: Equilibrium structure and deviations from Hardy- Weinberg frequencies

Genetics

Volumn 148, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 2029-2039

  Overath, R Deborah ^a   Asmussen, Marjorie A ^a  

^a University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS BREEDING; DOMINANT INHERITANCE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; MATING; NONHUMAN; PLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 0031894949     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ASKER, S. E., and L. JERLING, 1992 Apomixis in Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
2. ASMUSSEN, M. A., and E. BASNAYAKE, 1990 Frequency-dependent selection: the high potential for permanent genetic variation in the diallelic, pairwise interaction model. Genetics 125: 215-230.
3. BAYER, R. L. 1989 Patterns of isozyme variation in Antennaria rosea (Asteraceae: Inuleae) polyploid complex. Syst. Bot. 14: 389-397.
4. HAMRICK, J. L., and M. J. W. GODT, 1989 Allozyme diversity in plant species, pp. 43-63, in Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources, edited by A. H. D. BROWN, M. T. CLEGG, A. L. KAHLER and B. S. WEIR. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
5. HAMRICK, J. L., M. J. W. GODT and S. L. SHERMAN-BROYLES, 1992 Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New For. 6: 95-124.
6. HAYMAN, B. I., 1953 Mixed selfing and random mating when homozygotes are at a disadvantage. Heredity 7: 185-192.
7. KARLIN, S., 1969 A First Course in Stochastic Processes. Academic Press, New York.
8. KIMURA, M., and T. OHTA, 1971 Theoretical Aspects of Population Genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
9. LESSIOS, H. A., 1992 Testing electrophoretic data for agreement with Hardy-Weinberg expectations. Mar. Biol. 112: 517-523.
10. LEWONTIN, R. C., and C. C. COCKERHAM, 1959 The goodness-of-fit test for detecting natural selection in random mating populations. Evolution 13: 561-564.
11. LI, C. C., 1959 Notes on the relative fitness of genotypes that forms a geometric progression. Evolution 13: 564-567.
12. LI, C. C., 1988 Pseudo-random mating populations. In celebration of the 80th anniversary of the Hardy-Weinberg Law. Genetics 119: 731-737.
13. LI, C. C., and D. G. HORVITZ, 1953 Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 5: 107-117.
14. LYNCH, M., 1987 The consequences of fluctuating selection for isozyme polymorphisms in Daphnia. Genetics 115: 657-669.
15. MARSHALL, D. R., and B. S. WEIR, 1979 Maintenance of genetic variation in apomictic plant populations. I. Single locus models. Heredity 42: 159-172.
16. OVERATH, R. D., and J. L. HAMRICK, 1988 Allozyme diversity in Amelanchier arborea and A. Laevis (Rosaceae). Rhodora (in press).
17. SCHAAP, T., 1980 The applicability of the Hardy-Weinberg principle in the study of populations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 44: 211-215.
18. WALLACE, B., 1958 The comparison of observed and calculated zygotic distributions. Evolution 12: 113-115.
19. WORKMAN, P. L., 1969 The analysis of simple genetic polymorphisms. Hum. Biol. 41: 96-114.
20. WORKMAN, P. L., and S. K. JAIN, 1966 Zygotic selection under mixed random mating and self-fertilization: theory and problems of estimation. Genetics 54: 159-171.
21. WRIGHT, S., 1951 The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugenics 15: 323-354.