Assisted hatching does not enhance IVF success in good-prognosis patients

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 62-64

  Hurst, Bradley S ^a   Tucker, Kathleen E ^a   Awoniyi, Caleb A ^a   Schlaff, William D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Assisted hatching; Implantation; In vitro fertilization; Micromanipulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HATCHING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MICROMANIPULATION; NIDATION; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 0031894831     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02766826     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Alikani M, Cohen J, Liccardi FL, Talansky BE: Micromanipulation. In Annual Progress in Reproductive Medicine, 1993, RH Asch, JWW Studd (eds). New York, Parthenon, 1993, pp 1-18
2. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S: Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988;49;112-117
3. Veeck LL: Preembryo grading: In Atlas of the Human Oocyte and Early Conceptus. Baltimore, MD, Williams and Wilkins, 1991, Vol 2, pp 121-149
4. Tucker MJ, Ingargiola PE, Massey JB, Morton PC, Weimer KE, Wilker SR, Wright G: Assisted hatching with or without bovine oviductal epithelial cell co-culture for poor prognosis in vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1528-1531