Memory for locations within regions: Spatial biases and visual hemifield differences

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 97-107

  Laeng, B ^a,b   Peters, M ^a   McCabe, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; SPATIAL MEMORY; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0031891577     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211373     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BOWERS, D., & HEILMAN, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18, 491-498.
2. BRADSHAW, J. L., NATHAN, G., NETTLETON, N. C., WILSON, L., & PIERSON, J. (1987). Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection? Neuropsychologia, 25, 735-738.
3. BRYANT, D. J., & SUBBIAH, I. (1994). Subjective landmarks in perception and memory for spatial location. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 119-139.
4. FRANKLIN, N., HENKEL, L. A., & ZANGAS, T. (1995). Parsing surrounding space into regions. Memory & Cognition, 23, 397-407.
5. HELLIGE, J. B. (1993). Hemispheric asymmetry: What's right and what's left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. HELLIGE, J. B., & MICHIMATA, C. (1989). Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory & Cognition, 17, 770-776.
7. HUTTENLOCHER, J., HEDGES, L. V., & DUNCAN, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352-376.
8. JASTROW, J. (1893). On the judgment of angles and positions of lines. American Journal of Psychology, 5, 214-268.
9. KOSSLYN, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imaging in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 2, 148-175.
10. KOSSLYN, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. KOSSLYN, S. M., KOENIG, O., BARRETT, A., CAVE, C. B., TANG, J., & GABRIELI, J. D. E. (1989). Evidence for two types of spatial representations: Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 743-750.
12. LAENG, B. (1994). Lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial functions. A study of unilateral stroke patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 189-203.
13. LAENG, B., BUCHTEL, H. A., & BUTTER, C. M. (1996). Tactile rod bisection: Hemispheric activation and sex differences. Neuropsychologia, 34, 1115-1121.
14. LAENG, B., & PETERS, M. (1995). Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates and categories in left-and right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 33, 421-439.
15. MANNING, L., HALLIGAN, P. W., & MARSHALL, J. C. (1990). Individual variation in line bisection: A study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 28, 647-655.
16. MILNER, A. D., BRECHMANN, M., & PAGLIARINI, L. (1992). To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgments in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36, 515-526.
17. WOODWORTH, R. S., & SCHLOSBERG, H. (1954). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.