Design and operation of the 1995 national survey of family growth

Family Planning Perspectives

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 43-46

  Mosher, William D ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY; FAMILY PLANNING; FERTILITY; HEALTH SURVEY; LIFE EVENT; PLANNING; PREGNANCY; PUBLIC HEALTH;

AMERICAS; DATA COLLECTION; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ERROR SOURCES; FAMILY AND HOUSEHOLD; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; MEASUREMENT; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN AMERICA; ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH METHODOLOGY; SAMPLING ERRORS; SAMPLING STUDIES; STUDIES; SURVEYS; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; DATA COLLECTION; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS (U.S.); QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELECTION BIAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031889866     PISSN: 00147354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2991525     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Mosher WD and Bachrach CA, Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995, Family Planning Perspec(iVcs,1996,28(l):4-12.
2. Abma JC et al.. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: new data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, Vital and Health Statistics, 1997, Series 23, No. 19;
3. Kelly JE et al., Plan and operation of the 1995 National Survey of Family Groivth, Vital and Health Statistics, 1997, Series 1, No. 36;
4. and Potter FJ et al., Sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, Vital and Health Statistics, 1998, Series 2, No. 124 (forthcoming).
5. Mosher WD and Bachrach CA, 1996, op. cit. (see reference 1);
6. and Kelly JE et al, 1997, op. cit. (see reference 2).
7. Mosher WD, Pratt WF and Duffer AP, CAPI, event histories and incentives in the NSFG Cycle 5 pretest, in: American Statistical Association, 1994 Proceedings of the Section on Sunvy Research Methods, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 1995, Vol. 1, pp. 59-63;
8. and Duffer AP et al., Effects of incentive payments on response rates and field costs in pretest of a national CAPI survey, in: American Statistical Association, 1994 Proceedings of the Section on Sunvy Research Methods, ibid., Vol. 2, pp. 1386-1392.
9. Chromy JR and Horvitz DG, The use of monetary incentives in national assessment household surveys, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1978,73(363): 473-478;
10. Berlin M et al., An experiment in monetary incentives, in: American Statistical Association, 3992 Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 1995, pp. 393-398;
11. Ezzati-Rice T et al., Time, dollars, and data: succeeding with remuneration in health surveys, in: Office of Management and Budget, Seminar on New Directions in Statistical Mellmlology, Statistical Policy Working Paper, Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget, 1995, No. 23, pp. 225-255;
12. and Kulka RA, The use of incentives to survey "hard to reach" respondents, in: ibid., pp. 256-289.
13. Lessler J, Weeks MF and O'Reilly J, Results from the National Survey of Family Growth pretest, in: American Statistical Association, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 4), Vol. 1, pp. 64-70.
14. Kelly JE et al., 1997, op. cit. (see reference 2).
15. Peterson LS and Schechter S, Methods to improve recall and reporting in a CAPI survey: the National Survey of Family Growth, in: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Proceedings of Ihc Census Bureau Research Conference, Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1995.
16. London KA, Peterson LS and Piccinino LJ, The National Survey of Family Growth: principal source of statistics on unintended pregnancy, in: Brwn SS and Eisenberg L, eds., The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Bcing of Children and Families, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press, 1995.
17. Abma JC et al., 1997, op. cit. (see reference 2), Tables 22 and 26-31.
18. Potter FJ et al., 1997, op. cit. (see reference 2).
19. Tanfer K, National Survey of Men: design and exe-cution, Family Planning Perspectives, 1993,25(2):83-86.
20. Laumann EO et al., The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994, p. 559.
21. Mosher VVD, Pratt VVF and Duffer AP, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 4);
22. Duffer AP et al., 1995, op. cit. (see reference 4);
23. and Guadagno MA et at., Women's reports of sensitive health conditions, attitudes, and behaviors, in: American Statistical Association, 1994 Proceedings of the Government Statistics Section, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 1995, pp. 82-87.
24. Mosher WD, Pratt WF and Duffer AP, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 4);
25. and Duffer AP et al., 1995, op. cit. (see reference 4).
26. Potter FJ et al., 1997, op. cit. (see reference 2).
27. Women's Reports of Sensitive Health Conditions, Attitudes, and Behaviors, In: American Statistical Association, 1994 Proceedings of the Government Statistics Section, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, Ibid.