Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 260-264

  Mitchell, Heather ^a   Medley, Gabriele ^a  

^a VICTORIAN CYTOLOGY SERVICE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cervical smears; Computer assisted diagnosis; Mass screening; PAPNET; Predictive value of tests

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 0031885954     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000331555     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Mitchell H, Medley G. Detection of laboratory false negative smears by the PAPNET Cytological Screening System. Acta Cytol 1998;42:265-270
2. Sterrett G. The Australian (Modified Bethesda) System for Reporting Gynaecological (Cervical) Cytology. Cytoletter, Dec 1996, pp 23-27
3. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology. Boston, Little, Brown, 1985
4. PAPNET Review Station Operator's Manual. Neuromedical Systems Inc, 1995
5. Kurman RJ, Solomon D. The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologie Diagnoses. New York, SpringerVerlag, 1994
6. Morrison AS. Screening in Chronic Disease. New York, Oxford University Press, 1985
7. Jones BA, Heard NV. Q Probes: Pap Smear Rescreening Data Analysis and Critique. College of American Pathologists, 1993
8. Cervical Cytology 1993-94. Summary Information from Form KC61. London, Department of Health Statistics Division, 1995