Acute appendicitis the end of McBurney?;Verdachtsdiagnose 'akute appendizitis' - Ende des wechselschnittes?

Swiss Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 13-17

  Schob O ^a,b   Gianom, D ^a   Baiardi, R ^a   Schlumpf, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Klinik fur Viszeralchirurgie   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Appendicitis; Diagnostic laparoscopy; Pelvic disease

Indexed keywords

ACUTE APPENDICITIS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE;

EID: 0031884930     PISSN: 10239332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PC et al. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy Surgery 1992; 112(3):497-501.
2. Heinzelmann M, Simmen HP, Cummins AS et al. Is laparoscopic appendectomy the new «gold standard»? Arch Surg 1995; 130(7): 782-5.
3. Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A et al. Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: Results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 1996; 120(1):71-4.
4. Sayed Hassen AH, Cade RJ. A prospective trial of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Aust NZJ Surg 1996; 66(3):178-80.
5. Kollias J, Harries KH, Otto G et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis: A prospective study. Aust NZJ Surg 1994; 64(12):830-5.
6. Nageli J, Zund M, Lange J. [Laparoscopic diagnosis in suspected acute appendicitis]. Helv Chir Acta 1994; 60(5):787-91.
7. McAnena OJ, Austin O, O'Connell PR et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: A prospective evaluation [see comments]. Br J Surg 1992; 79(8):818-20.
8. Tate JJ, Chung SC, Dawson J et al. Conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis [see comments]. Br J Surg 1993; 80(6):761-4.
9. Hebebrand D, Troidl H, Spangenberger W et al. [Laparoscopic or classical appendectomy? A prospective randomized study]. Chirurg 1994; 65(2):112-20.
10. Sfairi A, Patel JC. [Laparoscopy for appendicular syndromes in young women. Results of a prospective study]. J Chir Paris 1995; 132(8-9):333-5.
11. Olsen JB, Myren CJ, Haahr PE. [Randomized trial on the value of diagnostic laparoscopy before appendectomy]. Ugeskr Laeger 1995; 157(5):584-5.
12. Cox MR, McCall JL, Padbury RT et al. Laparoscopic surgery in women with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis [see comments]. Med J Aust 1995; 162(3):130-2.
13. Champault G, Lauroy J, Guillon P et al. [What are abdominal painful syndromes of unexplained origin? Prospective study: 99 patients followed for three years]. Ann Chir 1996; 50(3):258-62.
14. Zaninotto G, Rossi M, Anselmino M et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional surgery for suspected appendicitis in women. Surg Endose 1995; 9(3):337-40.
15. Kum CK, Sim EK, Goh PM et al. Diagnostic laparoscopy: Reducing the number of normal appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36(8):763-6.
16. Hawthorn IE. Abdominal pain as a cause of acute admission to hospital [see comments]. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992; 37(6):389-93.
17. Graham A, Henley C, Mobley J. Laparoscopic evaluation of acute abdominal pain. J Laparoendosc Surg 1991; 1(3):165-8.
18. Benoit J, Cruaud P, Lauroy J et al. [Does laparoscopic treatment of abdominal infections generate bacteremias? Prospective study: 75 cases]. J Chir Paris 1995; 132(12):472-7.
19. Cox MR, McCall JL, Wilson TG et al. Laparoscopic appendicectomy: A prospective analysis. Aust NZJ Surg 1993; 63(11):840-7.
20. Choy A, McGuinness C, Gajraj H. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: A prospective evaluation [letter; comment). Br J Surg 1993; 80(3):399.
21. Jadallah FA, Abdul Ghani AA, Tibblin S. Diagnostic laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomy in fertile women. Eur J Surg 1994; 160(1):41-5.
22. Lehmann K, Attinger B, Villiger P et al. [Fewer negative appendectomies thanks to improved clinical diagnosis]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1992; 122(10):334-8.
23. Reymond MA, Merlini M, Tschantz P et al. [How to reduce the number of negative appendectomies? A prospective two-center study of 120 patients]. Helv Chir Acta 1994; 60(4):647-51.