Contralaterally evoked transient otoacoustic emissions

Hearing Research

Volumn 115, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 39-44

  Pratt, Hillel ^a   Shi, Yongbing ^a   Polyakov, Andrey ^a  

^a Evoked Potentials Laboratory   (Israel)

Author keywords

Click; Contralateral; Efferent system; Human; Transient evoked otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLICK; COCHLEA; EFFERENT NERVE; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MONAURAL HEARING; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COCHLEA; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEURONS, EFFERENT; OLIVARY NUCLEUS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 0031882937     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00178-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aharonson V., Furst M., Pratt H., Polyakov A., Chaigrecht M., Korczyn A.D. Multilevel model for binaural processing in the brain stem. Isr. J. Med. Sci. 31:1995;728.
2. Berlin C.I., Hood L.J., Wen H., Szabo P., Cecola R.P., Rigby P., Jackson D.F. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 71:1993;1-11.
3. Collet L., Kemp D.T., Veuillet E., Duclaux R., Moulin A., Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear. Res. 43:1990;251-262.
4. Djupesland G., Zwislocki J. Effect of temporal summation on the human stapedius reflex. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.). 71:1971;262-268.
5. Harrison, J.M., Howe, M.E., 1974. Anatomy of the descending auditory system (mammalian). In: Keidel, W.D., Neff, W.D. (eds.), Auditory System, Vol. V/1, Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Chapter 11, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 363-388.
6. Iurato, S., 1974. Efferent innervation of the cochlea. In: Keidel, W.D., Neff, W.D. (Eds.), Auditory System, Volume V/1, Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Chapter 8, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 261-282.
7. Kemp D.T., Ryan S., Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 11:1990;93-105.
8. Kobler J.B., Guinan J.J., Vacher S.R., Norris B.E. Acoustic-reflex frequency selectivity in single stapedius motoneurons of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 68:1992;807-817.
9. Lind O. Contralateral suppression of TEOAE. Attempts to find a latency. Br. J. Audiol. 28:1994;219-225.
10. Morlet T., Ferber C., Duclaux R., Challel M.J., Collet L. Effect of sleep stages on transiently evoked oto-acoustic emissions in infants. Br. Dev. 16:1994;115-120.
11. Penner M.J., Glotzbach L., Huang T. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: Measurement and data. Hear. Res. 68:1993;229-237.
12. Puel J.-L., Rebillard G. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: Evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87:1990;1630-1635.
13. Rasmussen G.L. The olivary peduncle and other fiber projections of the superior olivary complex. J. Comp. Neurol. 84:1946;141-220.
14. Shi, Y., Polyakov, A., Pratt, H., 1997. Effects of interaural intensity and time disparity on transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. (in press).
15. Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Murphy W.J., Tubis A. New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects. Hear. Res. 70:1993;170-182.
16. Veuillet E., Collet L., Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: Dependence on stimulus variables. J. Neurophysiol. 65:1991;724-735.