Productivity comparison of horizontal and vertical ground water remediation well scenarios

Ground Water

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 98-103

  Sawyer, Charles S ^a   Lieuallen Dulam, Karen K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b RAYTHEON COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; CALCULATIONS; COSTS; ECONOMICS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; MASS TRANSFER; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; WATER WELLS;

EXTRACTION WELLS; REMEDIATION;

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL;

AQUIFER; GROUNDWATER; POLLUTION; REMEDIATION;

AQUIFER; CONTAMINANT; GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION; WELL;

EID: 0031882680     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb01069.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Joshi, S.D. 1991. Horizontal well technology. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Pennwell Publishing Co.
2. Keckler, D. 1994. SURFER for Windows, User's Guide. Golden, Colorado: Golden Software Inc.
3. Langseth, D.E. 1990. Hydraulic performance of horizontal wells. In Proceedings of HMCRI's 11th National Conference, SUPERFUND '90, Nov. 26-28, 1990. Washington, D.C.: HMCRI.
4. McDonald, M.G., and A.W. Harbaugh. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 83-875.
5. Wilson, D.K., and D.S. Kaback. 1993. Industry survey of horizontal wells. Technical Report WSRC-TR-93-511. Aiken, South Carolina: Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Savannah River Technology Center.
6. Zheng, C. 1991. A modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems. Bethesda, Maryland: S.S. Papadopulos and Associates Inc.