Effects of individual quota systems on New Zealand and British Columbia fisheries

Ecological Applications

Volumn 8, Issue 1 SUPPL., 1998, Pages

  Dewees, Christopher M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

British Columbia; Fishery management; Individual quotas; Marine fisheries; New Zealand; Race for fish; Rights based fishing; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FLATFISH FISHERY; INDIVIDUAL TRANSFERABLE QUOTA; PACIFIC HALIBUT; QUOTA SYSTEM;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; NEW ZEALAND;

HIPPOGLOSSUS STENOLEPIS;

EID: 0031881172     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2641371     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Annala, J. H. 1996. New Zealand's ITQ system: have the first eight years been a success or failure? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6:43-62.
2. Anonymous. 1997. The snapper one case. Seafood New Zealand 5(s):29-31.
3. Arnason, R. 1996. On the ITQ fisheries management system in Iceland. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6:63-90.
4. Bell, F. H. 1981. The Pacific halibut: the resource and the fishery. Northwest, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
5. Bevin, G., P. Maloney, P. Roberts, and N. Redzwan. 1990. Economic review of the New Zealand fishing industry 1988-89. New Zealand Fishing Industry Board, Wellington, New Zealand.
6. Boyd, R. O., and C. M. Dewees. 1992. Putting theory into practice: individual transferable quotas in New Zealand's fisheries. Society and Natural Resources 5:179-198.
7. Brander, L., and D. L. Burke. 1995. Rights-based vs. competitive fishing of sea scallops Placopecten magellanicus in Nova Scotia. Aquatic Living Resource 8:279-288.
8. Casey, K. E., C. M. Dewees, B. R. Turris, and J. E. Wilen. 1995. The effects of individual vessel quotas in the British Columbia halibut fishery. Marine Resource Economics 10: 211-230.
9. Christy, F. T. 1973. Fisherman quotas: a tentative suggestion for domestic management. Occasional Paper 19, University of Rhode Island, Law of Sea Institute, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
10. Dewees, C. M. 1989. Assessment of the implementation of individual transferable quotas in New Zealand's inshore fishery. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 9:131-139.
11. E. B. Economics. 1993. Evaluation study of individual quota management in the halibut fishery. Internal audit and evaluation branch publication, Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
12. Ginter, J. C. 1995. The Alaskan community development quota fisheries management program. Ocean and Coastal Management 28:147-163.
13. Gordon, H. S. 1954. The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. Journal of Political Economy 62:124-142.
14. Grafton, R. Q. 1996. Individual transferable quotas: theory and practice. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6:5-20.
15. Moloney, D. G., and P. H. Pearse. 1979. Quantitative rights as an instrument for regulation of commercial fisheries. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 36:859-866.
16. New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries. 1995. Country report-New Zealand. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Committee for Fisheries, Wellington, New Zealand
17. Sissenwine, M. P., and P. M. Mace. 1992. ITQs in New Zealand: the era of fixed quota in perpetuity. Fishery Bulletin 90:147-160.
18. Turris, B. R. 1994. Canada's Pacific Halibut fishery: a case study of an individual quota fishery in K. L. Gimbel, editor. Limiting access to marine fisheries: keeping the focus on conservation. Center for Marine Conservation, Washington, D.C., USA.
19. Wilen, J. E. 1988. Limited entry licensing: a retrospective assessment. Marine Resource Economics 5:313-324.