Comparison and optimisation of softcopy and hardcopy reading of chest radiographs with computer simulation;Vergleich der monitor- und alternatorbefundung von digitalen thoraxaufnahmen mittels eines computergestutzten verfahrens

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Neuen Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 169, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 38-44

  Heckermann, D ^a   Fink, U ^a   Schatzl M ^a   Fink, B ^a   Kenn, W ^b   Miller, P ^b   Pistitsch, C ^a   Herrmann, K ^a   Reiser, M ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Digital Radiography; Monitors; Picture archiving and communication system (PACS); ROC analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; LUNG NODULE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ROC CURVE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0031878109     PISSN: 09366652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ackermann SJ, Gitlin JN, Gayler R, Flagle CD, Bryan RN. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of fracture and pneumonia detection: Comparison of laserdigitized workstation images and conventional analog radiographs. Radiology 1993; 186: 263-268
2. Beard DV, Hemminger BM, Pisano ED, Denelsbeck KM, Warshauer DM, Mauro MA, Keefe B, Mc Cartney WH, Wilcox CB. CT interpretation with a low cost workstation: A timing study. J Digit Imag 1994; 7: 1-7
3. Beard DV. Designing a radiology workstation: A focus on navigating during the interpretation task. J Digit Imag 1990; 3: 152-163
4. Brandt GA. Einfluß technischer Parameter auf die Diagnosequalität. Akt Radiol 1991; 1: 565-569
5. Brogdon BG, Kesley CA, Mosley RD. Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. Radiol Clin North Amer 1983; 21: 633-654
6. Carmody DP, Nodine CF, Kundel HL. Global and segmented search for lung nodules of different edge gradients. Invest Radiol 1980; 15: 224-233
7. Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage, CIELAB und CIELUV Farbenraum, (1976) in: DIN 6174: Farbmetrische Bestimmung von Farbabständen von Körperfarben nach der CIELAB Formel, Beuth Verlag, Berlin
8. Cox CG, Cook LT, Mc Millan JH, Rosenthal SJ, Dwyer III SJ. Chest radiography: Comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film. Radiology 1990; 176: 771-776
9. Deutsches Institut für Normung, Norm 6856 Teil 1: Anforderungen für die Herstellung und den Betrieb von Betrachtungsgeräten zur Befundung von Durchsichtsbildern in der medizinischen Diagnostik (1995) und Norm 5035, Teil 3: Innenraumbeleuchtung mit künstlichem Licht, Beleuchtung in Krankenhäusern. Berlin: Beuth Verlag, 1988
10. Deutsches Institut für Normung, Normentwurf IEC 62 B (CO) 106 Teil 2-5: Konstanzprüfungen-Bildwiedergabegeräte (Monitore). Berlin: Beuth Verlag, 1994
11. Dorfman DD, Alf E. Maximum likelihood estimation of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervalsrating method data. J Math Psych 1969; 6: 487-496
12. Fiebich M, Wiesmann W, Peters PE. Befundung am Bildschirmarbeitsplatz. Radiologe 1994; 34: 317-322
13. Franken EA, Berbaum KS, Marley SM, Smith WL, Sato Y, Kao SCS, Milam SG. Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations. An ROC study. Invest Radiol 1992; 27: 732-737
14. Franken EA, Berbaum KS, Smith WL, Kao SCS, Sato Y. Comparison of a PACS workstation with conventional film for interpretation of neonatal examinations: a paired comparison study. Pediatr Radiol 1991; 21: 336-340
15. Hanley JA, Mc Neill BJ. The meaning and use of the area undera receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36
16. Hyrapetian A, Aberle DR, Hunag HK, Fiske R, Morioka C, Valentino D, Boechat MI. Comparison of 2048-line digital formats and conventional radiographs. An ROC Study. Amer J Roentgenol 1989; 152: 1113-1118
17. Kundel HL, laFollette PS. Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images. Radiology 1972; 103: 523-528
18. Leitlinien der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung in der Röntgendiagnostik. Dt Ärztebl 1989; 86: 1437-1444
19. Lusted LB. Signal detectability and medical decision-making. Science 1971; 171: 1217-1219
20. McNeill BJ, Hanley J. Statistical approaches to the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Med Dec Making 1984; 4: 137-150
21. Metz CE, Kronman HB. Statistical significance tests for binormal ROC curves. J Math Psych 1980; 22: 218-243
22. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 21: 720-733
23. Müller RD. Hirche H, Voß M, Buddenbroch D, John V, Gocke P. ROC Analyse zur Bildnachverarbeitung digitaler Thoraxaufnahmen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1995; 162: 163-169
24. Oestmann JW, Galanski M. ROC: Methodik zum Vergleich der diagnostischen Leistung bildgebender Verfahren. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1989; 151: 89-92
25. Prokop M, Schaefer C, Oestmann JW, Galanski M. Optimal parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs. Radiology 1993; 187; 521-526
26. Roehrig H, Blume H, Ji TL, Browne M. Performance tests and quality control of cathode ray displays. J Digit Imag 1990; 3: 134-145
27. Slasky BS, Gur D, Good WF, Costa-Greco MA, Harris KM, Cooperstein LA, Rochette HE. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed and high-resolution workstation images. Radiology 1990; 174: 775-780
28. Starr SJ, Metz CE, Lusted LB, Goodenenough DJ. Visual detection and localisation of radiographic images. Radiology 1975; 116: 533ff
29. Sträub WH, Gur D, Good WF, Campbell WL, Davis PL, Hecht ST, Skolnick ML, Thaete FL, Rosenthal MS, Sashi D. Primary CT diagnosis of abdominal masses in a PACS environment. Radiol 1991; 178: 739-745