A model for end-stopping in the visual cortex

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 13, 1998, Pages 2023-2035

  Skottun, Bernt C ^a  

^a Skottun Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer simulations; End stopping; Fourier transform; Hypercomplex; Visual cortex

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NERVE CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; ROTATION; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 0031877688     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00293-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J Neurophysiol. 28:1965;229-289.
2. Gilbert C.D. Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond). 268:1977;391-421.
3. Rose D. Responses of single units in cat visual cortex to moving bars of light as a function of bar length. J Physiol (Lond). 271:1977;1-23.
4. Henry G.H., Goodwin A.W., Bishop P.O. Spatial summation of responses in receptive fields of single cells in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 32:1978;245-266.
5. Kato H., Bishop P.O., Orban G.A. Hypercomplex and simple/complex cell classifications in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 41:1978;1071-1095.
6. Orban G.A., Kato H., Bishop P.O. End-zone region in receptive fields of hypercomplex and other striate neurons in the cat. J Neurophysiol. 42:1979;818-832.
7. Orban G.A., Kato H., Bishop P.O. Dimensions and properties of end-zone inhibitory areas in receptive fields of hypercomplex cells in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 42:1979;833-849.
8. Yamane S., Maske R., Bishop P.O. Properties of end-zone inhibition of hypercomplex cells in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 60:1985;200-203.
9. Dobbins A., Zucker S.W., Cynader M.S. Endstopped neurons in the visual cortex as a substrate for calculating curvature. Nature. 329:1987;438-441.
10. DeAngelis G.C., Freeman R.D., Ohzawa I. Length and width tuning of neurons in the cat's primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 71:1994;347-374.
11. Bolz J., Gilbert C.D. Generation of end-inhibition in the visual cortex via interlaminar connections. Nature. 320:1986;362-365.
12. Sillito A.M., Versiani V. The contribution of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the length preference of hypercomplex cells in layers II and III of the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond). 273:1977;775-790.
13. Grieve K.L., Sillito A.M. A re-appraisal of the role of layer VI of the visual cortex in the generation of cortical end inhibition. Exp Brain Res. 87:1991;521-529.
14. Jones J.P., Palmer L.A. An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 58:1987;1233-1258.
15. De Valois RL, De Valois KK. Spatial Vision. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
16. Koch C, Poggio T. Multiplying with synapses and neurons. In: McKenna T, Davis J, Zornetzer SF, editors. Single Neuron Computation. Boston, MA: Academic Press, 1992:315-345.
17. Henry G.H., Dreher B., Bishop P.O. Orientation specificity of cells in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 37:1974;1394-1409.
18. Koenderink J.J., Richards W. Two-dimensional curvature operators. J Opt Soc Am A. 5:1988;1136-1141.
19. Bishop P.O., Henry G.H. Striate neurons: receptive field concepts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 11:1972;346-354.
20. Dreher B. Hypercomplex cells in the cat's striate cortex. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 11:1972;355-356.
21. De Valois R.L., Thorell L., Albrecht D.G. Periodicity of striate-cortex-cell receptive fields. J Opt Soc Am A. 2:1985;1115-1122.
22. Green E.S., DeAngelis G.C., Freeman R.D. Development of inhibitory mechanisms in the kitten's visual cortex. Vis Neurosci. 13:1996;1109-1117.
23. Orban GA. Neuronal Operations in the Visual Cortex. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984.
24. Rosenquist AC. Connections of visual cortical areas in the cat. In: Peters A, Jones EG, editors. Cerebral Cortex, vol. 3. New York: Plenum Press, 1985:81-117.
25. Heggelund P., Hohmann A. Responses of striate cortical cells to moving edges of different curvatures. Exp Brain Res. 23:1975;211-216.
26. Koch C, Segev I. Introduction. In: Koch C, Segev I, editors. Methods in Neuronal Modeling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989:1-8.
27. Albrecht D.G., Geisler W.S. Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex. Vis Neurosci. 7:1991;531-546.
28. Movshon J.A., Thompson I.D., Tolhurst D.J. Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond). 283:1978;53-77.
29. Zetzsche C., Barth E. Fundamental limits of linear filters in the visual processing of two-dimensional signals. Vis Res. 30:1990;1111-1117.
30. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond). 148:1959;574-591.
31. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond). 160:1962;106-154.