Testing the validity of responses to contingent valuation questioning

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 131-148

  Bennett, Jeff ^a   Morrison, Mark ^a   Blamey, Russell ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; SALINISATION;

AUSTRALIA; SOUTH AUSTRALIA;

EID: 0031876429     PISSN: 1364985X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.00041     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Learner, E., Radner, R. and Schuman, H. 1993, 'Contingent valuation methodology report, report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation', Federal Register, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 4602-14.
2. Bennett, J. 1981, Evaluation of the Benefits of Natural Ecosystem Preservation, unpublished PhD, Australian National University, Canberra.
3. Bennett, J., Blarney, R. and Morrison, M. 1997, Valuing Damage to South Australian Wetlands Using the Contingent Valuation Method, Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, Occasional Paper No. 13/97, Canberra.
4. Blamey, R., Common, M. and Quiggin, J. 1995, 'Respondents to contingent valuation surveys: consumers or citizens?', Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 263-88.
5. Boyle, K., Desvousges, W., Johnson, F.R., Dunford, R. and Hudson, S. 1994, 'An investigation of part-whole biases in contingent valuation studies', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 27, no. 1., pp. 64-83.
6. Brunton, R. 1991, 'Will play money drive out the real money?', Environmental Backgrounder, no. 2, IPA, Canberra, pp. 1-9.
7. Carson, R. 1995, Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope, mimeo, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
8. Carson, R., Wilks, L. and Imber, D. 1994, 'Valuing the preservation of Australia's Kakadu conservation zone', Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 46, Supplementary Issue, pp. 727-49.
9. Cummings, R. 1989, Comment Submitted to the Office of Environmental Project Review, Department of the Interior, in response to ANPR Concerning Type B Natural Resource Damage Assessments, Washington, DC.
10. Fischoff, B., Quadrel, M., Kamlet, M., Dawes, R., Fischbeck, P., Klepper, S., Leland, J. and Loewenstein, G. 1993, 'Embedding effects: stimulus representation and response modes', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 211-34.
11. Gerrans, P. 1994, The Embedding Effect or Good Cause Dump Hypothesis in the Contingent Valuation Method - A Test, paper presented to the 23rd Conference of Economists, Gold Coast, August 1994.
12. Imber, D., Stevenson, G. and Wilks, L. 1991, 'A contingent valuation survey of the Kakadu conservation zone', RAC Research Report, no. 3, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra,
13. Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J. 1992a, 'Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 57-70.
14. Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J. 1992b, 'Contingent valuation and the value of public goods: reply', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 90-4.
15. Loomis, J., Lockwood, M. and DeLacy, T. 1993, 'Some empirical evidence on embedding effects in contingent valuation of forest protection', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 45-55.
16. Randall, A. and Hoehn, J. 1996, 'Embedding in market demand systems', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 369-80.
17. Resource Assessment Commission 1992, Forest and Timber Inquiry Final Report, vol. 2B, AGPS, Canberra.
18. Rolfe, J. and Bennett, J. 1996, 'Respondents to contingent valuation surveys: consumers or citizens? (Blarney, Common and Quiggin, AJAE 39:3) - a comment', Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 129-34.
19. Smith, V. K. 1992, 'Comment: arbitrary values, good causes and premature verdicts', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 71-89.
20. Smith, V.K. and Osborne, L. 1996, 'Do contingent valuation estimates pass a "scope" test? A meta-analysis', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 287-301.