Upside assay sensitivity in a dental pain model

European Journal of Pain

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 179-186

  Breivik, E K ^a   Haanaes H R ^a   Barkvoll, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODEINE; PARACETAMOL; PINEX; PINEX FORTE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG DISCRIMINATION; DRUG EFFICACY; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PAIN;

EID: 0031875920     PISSN: 10903801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1090-3801(98)90010-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Breivik EK, Björnsson GA. Variation in surgical trauma and baseline pain intensity: effects on assay sensitivity of an analgesic trial. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106 (in press).
2. Cooper SA, Breen JF, Guiliani RL, Chase C. The relative efficacy of indoprofen compared with opioid-analgesic combinations. J Oral Surg 1981; 39: 21-25.
3. Copper SA, Erlichman MC, Mardirossian G. Double-blind comparison of an acetaminophen-codeine-caffeine combination in oral surgery pain. Anesthesia Progress 1986; 3: 139-142.
4. Cooper SA. Single-dose analgesic studies: the upside and downside of assay sensitivity. In: Max MB, Portenoy RK, Laska EM, editors. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Volume 18. New York: Raven Press, 1991: 117-123.
5. deCraen AJM, di Guilo G, Lampe-Schoenmackers AJEM, Kessels AGH, Kleinen J. Analgesic efficacy and safety of paracetamol-codeine combinations versus paracetamol alone: a systematic review. BMJ 1996; 313: 321-325.
6. Dionne RA, Snyder J, Hargreaves KM. Analgesic efficacy of flurbiprofen in comparison with acetaminophen, acetaminophen plus codeine, and placebo after impacted third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52: 919-924.
7. Forbes JA, Beaver WT, White EH, White RW, Neilson GB, Schackleford RW. Diflunisal. A new oral analgesic with an unusually long duration of action. JAMA 1982;248: 2139-2142.
8. Hill RC, Turner P. Importance of initial pain in postoperative assessment of analgesic drugs. J Clin Pharmacol 1969; 9: 321-327.
9. Mainland D. Interpretation after an experiment. In: Mainland D, editor. Elementary Medical Statistics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1963: 70-100.
10. Matthews DE, Farewell VT. Using and Understanding Medical Statistics, third Edition. Basel: Karger, 1966.
11. Max MB, Laska EM. Single-dose analgesic comparisons. In: Max MB, Portenoy RK, Laska EM, editors. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, Volume 18. New York: Raven Press, 1991: 281-304.
12. Max MB. Combining opioids with other drugs: Challenges in clinical trial design. In: Gerhardt GF, Hannond DL, Jensen TS, editors. Proc of the 7th World Congress on Pain, Progress in Pain Research and Management. Volume 2. Seattle: IASP Press, 1994: 569-586.
13. Moore A, Collins S, Carroll D, McQuay H. Paracetamol with and without codeine in acute pain: a quantitative systematic review. Pain 1997; 70: 193-201.
14. Quiding H. Evaluation of analgesia in man. Methodological aspects with special emphasis on codeine. Thesis 1993.
15. Skjelbred P, Lökken P. Paracetamol versus placebo: effects on postoperative course. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 15: 27-33.
16. Skovlund E. Should we tell trial patients that they might receive placebo? Lancet 1991; 337: 1041.
17. Sriwatanakul K, Lasagna L, Cox C. Evaluation of current trial methodology in analgesimetry based on experts' opinions and analysis of several analgesic studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1983; 34: 277-283.
18. Stein C, Yassouridis A. Peripheral morphine analgesia. Pain 1997; 71: 119-121.
19. Stubhaug A, Grimstad J, Breivik H. Lack of analgesic effect of oral tramadol 50 mg and 100 mg after orthopaedic surgery. Pain 1995; 62: 111-118.
20. Stubhaug A, Breivik H. Post-operative analgesic trials: some important issues. In: Breivik H, editor. Postoperative Pain Management. London: Baillière Tindall, 1995: 555-584.