Comparison of duplex imaging and arteriography in the evaluation of lower limb arteries

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 85, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 1099-1102

  Aly, S ^a   Sommerville, K ^a   Adiseshiah, M ^a   Raphael, M ^a   Coleridge Smith, P D ^a   Bishop, C C R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTERIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; LEG; MALE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX;

EID: 0031875421     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00786.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography: a new technique. Acta Radiologica Stockholm 1953; 39: 368-76.
2. Nicolaides A, Renton SC. Duplex scanning: the second sight of a vascular surgeon. Eur J Vasc Surg 1990; 4: 445-7.
3. Jager KA, Philips DS, Martin RL, Hanson C, Roederer GO, Langlois YE et al. Noninvasive mapping of lower limb arterial lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985; 11: 516-21.
4. Kohler TR, Nance DR, Cramer MM, Vandenburghe N, Strandness DE Jr. Duplex scanning for diagnosis of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal disease. Circulation 1987; 76: 1074-80.
5. Cossman DV, Ellison JE, Wagner WH, Carroll RM, Treiman RL, Foran RF et al. Comparison of contrast arteriography, to arterial mapping with colour flow duplex imaging in lower limb extremities. J Vasc Surg 1989; 10: 522-9.
6. Legemate DA, Ackerstaff RG, Eikelboom BC. Duplex scanning in cerebral, abdominal, and peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Surg 1989; 3: 287-95.
7. Legemate DA, Teeuwen C, Hoeneveld H, Ackerstaff RG, Eikelboom BC. The potential of duplex scanning to replace aorto-iliac and femoropopliteal angiography. Eur J Vasc Surg 1989; 3: 49-54.
8. Legemate DA, Teeuwen C, Hoeneveld H. Value of duplex scanning compared with angiography and pressure measurement in the assessment of aortoiliae arterial lesions. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 1003-8.
9. Legemate DA, Teeuwen C, Hoeneveld H, Eikelboom BC. Spectral analysis criteria in duplex scanning of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal arterial disease. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17: 769-76.
10. Moneta GL, Yeager RA, Antonovic R, Hall L, Caster J, Cummings CA et al. Accuracy of lower extremity arterial duplex mapping. J Vasc Surg 1992; 15: 275-83.
11. Langsfeld M, Nepute J, Hershey FB, Thorpe L, Auer AI, Binnington HB et al. The use of deep duplex scanning to predict hemodynamically significant aortoiliac stenoses. J Vasc Surg 1988; 7: 395-9.
12. Vashisht R, Ellis MR, Skidmore C, Blair SD, Greenhalgh RM, O'Malley MK. Colour-coded duplex ultrasonography in the selection of patients for endovascular surgery. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 1030-1.
13. Allard L, Cloutier G, Durand LG, Roederer GO, Langlois YE. Limitations of ultrasonic duplex scanning for diagnosing lower limb arterial stenosis in the presence of adjacent segment disease. J Vasc Surg 1994; 19: 650-7.
14. Sensier Y, Hartshorne T, Thrush A, Nydahl S, Bolia A, London N. A prospective comparison of lower limb colour-coded duplex scanning with arteriography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 11: 170-5.
15. Orron D, Ducksoo K, Kramer J. The role of arteriography in the evaluation of extracranial cerebrovascular artery disease. In: Bernstein E, Callow A, Nicoluides A, Shifrin E, eds. Cerebral Revascularisation. London: Med-Orion Publishing, 1993: 109-47.
16. Koennecke HC, Fobbe G, Hamed MM et at. Diagnottik Arterieller Gefaberkrankungen der unteren Extremitaten. Vasa 1991; 32(Suppl): 154-6.
17. Hatsukami TS, Primozich JF, Zierler RE, Harley JD, Strandness DE Jr. Color Doppler imaging of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1992; 16: 527-31.
18. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Update on some epidemiological features of intermittent claudication: the Framingham study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985; 33: 13-18.
19. McAllister FF. The fate of patients with intermittent claudication managed non-operatively. Am J Surg 1976; 132: 593-5.
20. Hughson VVG, Mann JI, Garrod A. Intermittent claudication: prevalence and risk factors. BMJ 1978; i: 1379-81.
21. Hughson WG, Mann JI, Tibbs DJ, Woods HF, Walton I. Intermittent claudication factors determining outcome. BMJ 1978; i: 1377-9.
22. Jelnes R, Gaardsting O, Hougaard Jensen K, Baekgaard N, Tonnesen KH, Schroeder T. Fate of intermittent claudication: outcome, and risk factors. BMJ 1986; 293: 1137-40.
23. Cronenwett JL, Warner KG, Zelenock GB, Whitehouse WM Jr, Graham LM, Lindenauer M et al. Intermittent claudication. Current results of nonoperative management. Arch Surg 1984; 119: 430-6.
24. Elsman BHP, Legematc DA, van der Heijden FHWM, de Vos H, Mali WP, Eikelhoom BC. Impact of ultrasonographic duplex scanning on therapeutic decision making in lower-limb arterial disease. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 630-3.