Event-related potential response to attended and unattended locations in an interference task

Biological Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-19

  Drysdale, Ka ^a   Fulham, W R ^a   Finlay, D C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bilateral presentation; ERPs; Interference task; Spatial cueing; Visual attention; Visual separation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; WAVEFORM;

ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031874247     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0511(98)00003-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anllo-Vento L., Hillyard S.A. Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection. Percept. Psychophys. 58(2):1996;191-206.
2. Broadbent D.E. Perception and Communication. 1958;Pergamon, London.
3. Broadbent D.E. Decision and Stress. 1971;Academic Press, London.
4. Broadbent D.E. Task combination and selective intake of information. Acta Psychol. 50:1982;253-290.
5. Deutsch J.A., Deutsch D. Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychol. Rev. 70(1):1963;80-90.
6. Drysdale K.A., Finlay D.C., Fulham W.R. An event-related potential examination of attended and unattended stimuli in visual selection using bilateral stimulus presentation. Biol. Psychol. 39:1995;115-129.
7. Duncan-Johnson C.C. P300 latency: A new metric of information processing. Psychophysiology. 18(3):1981;207-215.
8. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Kopell B. The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science. 214:1981;938-940.
9. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non search task. Percept. Psychophys. 16(1):1974;143-149.
10. Eriksen C.W., Hoffman J.E. Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Percept. Psychophys. 2B:1972;201-204.
11. Eriksen C.W., Hoffman J.D. The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Percept. Psychophys. 14(1):1973;155-160.
12. Eriksen C.W., St. James J.D. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Percept. Psychophys. 40(4):1986;225-240.
13. Eriksen C.W., Yeh Y. Allocation of attention in the visual field. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum Percept. Perform. 11(5):1985;583-597.
14. Heinze H.J., Luck S.J., Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A. Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75:1990;511-527.
15. Hillyard S., Munte T. Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials. Percept. Psychophys. 36(2):1984;185-198.
16. Hillyard S., Munte T., Neville H. Visual-spatial attention, orienting, and brain physiology. Posner M.I., Marin O.S. Mechanisms of Attention: Attention and Performance. XI:1985;63-84 Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.
17. Johnston W.A., Heinz S.P. Flexibility and capacity demands of attention. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 107(4):1978;420-435.
18. Jonides J. Voluntary versus automatic control over the minds eyes movement. Long J.B., Baddeley A.D. Attention and Performance. IX:1981;187-203 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Karayanidis F., Michie P.T. Frontal processing negativity in a visual selective attention task. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 99:1996;38-56.
20. LaBerge D. Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum Percept. Perform. 2(3):1983;379.
21. Luck S.J., Heinze H.J., Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A. Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75:1990;528-542.
22. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology. 31:1994a;291-308.
23. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum Percept. Perform. 20(5):1994b;1000-1014.
24. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: An electrophysiological analysis. Int. J. Neurosci. 80:1995;281-297.
25. Mangun G., Hillyard S. The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Hum. Factors. 22(2):1987;195-211.
26. Miller J. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions. Percept. Psychophys. 42(3):1991;270-288.
27. Moray N. Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 11:1959;56-60.
28. Murphy T.D., Eriksen C.W. Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues. Percept. Psychophys. 42(6):1987;576-586.
29. Posner M., Snyder C., Davidson B. Attention and the detection of signals. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 109(2):1980;160-174.
30. Ritter W., Simson R., Vaughan H. Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. Psychophysiology. 20(2):1983;168-179.
31. Ritter W., Simson R., Vaughan H., Macht M. Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. Science. 218:1982;909-910.
32. Wijers A.A., Okita T., Mulder G., Mulder L.J.M., Lorist M.M., Poiesz R., Scheffers M.K. Visual search and spatial attention: ERPs in focussed and divided attention conditions. Biol. Psychol. 25:1987;33-60.
33. Yantis S., Johnston J.C. On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 16(1):1990;135-149.