An integrated approach to climate policy in the US electric power sector

Energy Policy

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 375-393

  Bernow, Stephen ^a   Dougherty, William ^a   Duckworth, Max ^a   Brower, Michael ^b  

^a TELLUS INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Brower and Company   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON EMISSIONS; CLIMATE POLICY; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; EMISSIONS CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GAS; INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT;

USA;

EID: 0031871832     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00153-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aitken, D W (1992) Response of the Coalition for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies to California Energy Commission (CEC) November 1 'Notice and Order for Resource Assumptions Hearings' re Impact of Sustained Orderly Development on Technology Costs. In the Matter of 1992 Electricity Report (ER 92), Docket 90-ER-92 Sacramento, CA.
2. x Emissions Standards on Electrical Generation Facilities in the ECAR Region. Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy Tellus Institute, Boston, June.
3. Bernow, S, Biewald, B and Singh, D (1993) Modeling Renewable Electric Resources: A Case Study of Wind. A Report for the US Department of Energy Tellus Institute, Boston, October.
4. Bernow, S, Dougherty, W and Duckworth, M (1997) Quantifying the Impacts of a National, Tradable Renewables Portfolio Standard. The Electricity Journal, 10.
5. Brower M Cool Energy: Renewable Solutions to Environmental Problems. 1992;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Burtraw, D (1996) Trading emissions to clean the air: exchanges few but savings many. Resources. Resources for the Future Washington, DC.
7. Cantor Fitzgerald (1997) Allowance Price Indications. Cantor Fitzgerald Environmental Brokerage Services, July.
8. Cowan, R and Kline, D (1996) Implications of Potential 'Lock-in' for Renewable Energy. Prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency, TP-460-22112.
9. Dockery Det al. An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. N Engl J Med. 329:1993;1753-1757.
10. Duckworth, M and Biewald, B (1996) A Projection of Market-Based Prices for Air Emissions - Consequences for Renewable and Demand-Side Management Resources. Prepared for the Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources, Boston Tellus Institute, Boston, March.
11. Energy Information Administration (EIA) US Electric Utility Demand-Side Management 1994. 1995;DOE/EIA-0589(94).
12. EIA Annual Energy Outlook 1995. 1995;US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration Washington, DC.
13. EIA Annual Energy Outlook 1996. 1996;US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration Washington, DC.
14. EIA Annual Energy Outlook 1997. 1997;US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC.
15. EIA The Effects of Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 on Electric Utilities. An Update:1997;US Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration.
16. Ellerman D Private Communication Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. 1995;Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
17. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Analyzing Electric Power Generation under the CAAA. 1996;US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC.
18. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (1993) Technical Assessment Guide Volume 1: Electricity Supply - 1993 (Revision 7) TR-102276-V1R7, California Technology and Fuels Assessment Department Palo Alto, CA.
19. Festa, D (1996) Comments of the Center for Clean Air Policy on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement on Open Access for Transmission Service, Center for Clean Air Policy Washington, DC.
20. Golove W, Eto J Market Barriers to Energy Efficiency. A Critical Reappraisal of the Rationale for Public Policies to Promote Energy Efficiency:1996;LBL-38059 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
21. Hirst, E (1994) Costs and Effects of Electric-Utility DSM Programs: 1989 Through 1997, ORNL/CON-392, June.
22. Holt, E (1997) Disclosure and Certification: Truth and Labeling for Electric Power, Issue Brief No 5 for Renewable Energy Policy Project, University of Maryland at College Park, January.
23. Krause, F, Busch, J and Koomey, J (1992) Incorporating Global Warming Risks in Power Sector Planning: A Case Study of the New England Region. Prepared for the US Department of Energy, Office of Utility Technologies and Office of Policy Analysis Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, November.
24. Krause, F and Koomey, J (1994) Energy Policy in the Greenhouse: Volume II, Part 3C. The Cost and Potential of Conventional and Low-Carbon Electricity Options in Western Europe For the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and the Environment International Project for Sustainable Energy Paths.
25. Lee, H and Darani, A (1995) Electricity Restructuring and the Environment. Harvard Electricity Policy Group, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, December.
26. Miller, P, Amar, P and Tatsutani, M (1997) The Long-Range Transport of Ozone and Its Precursors in the Eastern United States. Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), Boston, March.
27. Nadel S Providing Utility Energy Efficiency Services in an Era of Tight Budgets. Maximizing Long-Term Energy Savings While Minimizing Utility Costs:1996;American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Washington, DC.
28. North American Electric Reliability Council (1994) 1993 Electricity Supply and Demand, NERC.
29. Rader, N and Norgaard, R (1996) Efficiency and Sustainability in Restructured Electricity Markets: The Renewables Portfolio Standard. The Electricity Journal July, 37-49.
30. Regulatory Assistance Project (1996) Perspectives in Electric Utility Restructuring, February, 36.
31. 2 Control Symposium, Book 3, EPRI, March.
32. Schwartz, J (1991) Particulate air pollution and daily mortality in Detroit, Environ Res 56 204-213.
33. Spurr, M (1996) Cogeneration/District Energy Systems in US Climate Change Strategy, Climate Change Analysis Workshop Proceedings Springfield, Virginia, June.
34. Tellus Institute and the Regulatory Assistance Project (1995) Promoting Environmental Quality in a Restructured Electric Industry. Prepared for the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.
35. x control technologies Proc. 89th Annual Meeting, Air and Waste Management Association, June.
36. Union of Concerned Scientists (1991) America's Energy Choices: Investing in a Strong Economy and a Clean Environment Alliance to Save Energy, American Council for An Energy-Efficient Economy, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Union of Concerned Scientists, in consultation with Tellus Institute.
37. Wisconsin Public Service Commission (1995) The Future of Wisconsin's Electric Power Industry, Environmental Impact Statement, Volume I PSC Docket 05-EI-114. Wisconsin Public Service Commission, Wisconsin.
38. Wiser, R, Pickle, S and Goldman, C (1996) California Renewable Energy Policy and Implementation Issues - An Overview of Recent Regulatory and Legislative Action. LBNL-39247, UC-1321 Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, September.
39. Wiser, R and Pickle, S (1997) Financing Investments in Renewable Energy: The Role of Policy Design and Restructuring, LBNL-39826, UC-1321 Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, March.
40. World Resources Institute, United Nations Environment Programme, United Nations Development Programme, and the World Bank (1996). World Resources 1996-1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.