Ad libitum mixing in a taste memory task: Methodological issues

Chemical Senses

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 379-384

  Vanne, Mika ^a   Laurinen, Pentti ^b   Tuorila, Hely ^a  

^a Department of Food Technology ^*  (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; TASTE; TRAINING;

EID: 0031865989     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/23.4.379     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Algom, D. and Cain, W.S. (1991) Remembered odors and mental mixtures: tapping reservoirs of olfactory knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percep. Perform., 17, 1104-1119.
2. Algom, D. and Marks, L.E. (1989) Memory psychophysics for taste. Bull. Psychon. Soc., 27, 257-259.
3. Algom, D., Marks, L.E. and Cain, W.S. (1993) Memory psychophysics for chemosensation: Perceptual and mental mixtures of odor and taste. Chem. Senses, 18, 151-160.
4. AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis. AOAC, Arlington, VA.
5. Barker, L.M. and Weaver, C.A., III (1983) Rapid, permanent, loss of memory for absolute intensity of taste and smell. Bull. Psychon. Soc., 21, 281-284.
6. Blais, C.A., Pangborn, R.M., Borhani, N.O., Ferrel, M.F., Prineas, R.J. and Laing, B. (1986) Effect of dietary sodium restriction on taste responses to sodium chloride: A longitudinal study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 44, 232-243.
7. Gescheider, G.A. (1985) Psychophysics: Method, Theory, and Application. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
8. Lundgren, B., Pangborn, R.M., Barylko-Pikielna, N. and Daget, N. (1976) Difference taste thresholds for sucrose in water and in orange juice: an interlaboratory study. Chem. Senses Flav., 2, 157-176.
9. Mattes, R.D. and Lawless, H.T. (1985) An adjustment error in optimization of taste intensity. Appetite, 6, 103-114.
10. McBride, R.L. (1989) Three models for taste mixtures. In Laing, D.G, Cain, W.S., McBride, R.L and Ache, B.W. (eds), Perception of Complex Smells and Tastes. Academic Press, Sydney, pp. 265-282.
11. O'Mahony, M. (1986) Sensory adaptation. J. Sensory Stud., 1, 237-258.
12. Pangborn, R.M. (1984) Sensory analysis as an analytical laboratory tool in food research. In Stewart, K.K. and Whitaker, J.R. (eds), Modern Methods of Food Analysis. AVI, Westport, CT, pp. 265-292.
13. Pangborn, R.M. and Braddock, K.S. (1989) Ad libitum preferences for salt in chicken broth. Food Qual. Pref., 1, 47-52.
14. Pangborn, R.M., Bos, K.E.O. and Stern, J.S. (1985) Dietary fat intake and taste responses to fat in milk by under-, normal, and overweight women. Appetite, 6, 25-40.
15. Schifferstein, H.N.J. and Frijters, J.E.R. (1990) Sensory integration in citric acid/sucrose mixtures. Chem. Senses, 15, 87-109.
16. Stevenson, R.J. and Prescott, J. (1997) Judgments of chemosensory mixtures in memory. Acta Psychol., 95, 195-214.
17. Tuorila, H., Hellemann, U. and Matuszewska, I. (1990) Can sodium contents of foods be reduced by adding flavors? Studies with beef broth. Physiol. Behav., 47, 709-712.
18. Tuorila, H., Theunissen, M.J.M. and Ahlström, R. (1996) Recalling taste intensities in sweetened and salted liquids. Chem. Senses, 21, 29-34.
19. Vanne, M., Tuorila, H. and Laurinen, P. (1998) Recalling sweet taste intensities in the presence and absence of other tastes. Chem. Senses., 23, 295-301.
20. Woskow, M.H. (1967) Some new methods of flavor evaluation. MBAA Tech. Q., 4, 68-72.