The period evoked potential: Objective response detection and 500 Hz thresholds in normally hearing adults

British Journal of Audiology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 167-175

  Parker, David ^a   Matsebula, Dumisa ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Mbabane Government Hospital   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

500 Hz thresholds; Frequency following response (FFR); Objective response detection; Period evoked potential (PEP)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; WAVEFORM;

EID: 0031864487     PISSN: 03005364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000061     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Batra R, Kuwada S, Maher V. The frequency-following response to continuous tones in humans. Hear Res 1986; 21: 167-77.
2. Brillinger D. Note on the estimate of evoked response. Biol Cybernet 1978; 31: 141-4.
3. Coats AC, Martin JL. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 605-22.
4. Cooper WA, Parker DJ. Stimulus artefact reduction systems for the TDH49 headphone in the recording of auditory evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1981; 2: 283-93.
5. Dobie RA. Objective response detection. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 31-5.
6. Dobie RA, Wilson MJ. Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by MSC. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 1-13.
7. Dobie RA, Wilson MJ. Objective response detection in the frequency domain. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 88: 516-24.
8. Don M, Eggermont JJ, Brackmann DE. Reconstruction of the audiogram using brain stem responses and high-pass masking. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 88 (Suppl. 57): 1-20.
9. Elberling C, Don M. Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 187-97.
10. Euler M, Kiessling J. Frequency-following potentials in man by lock-in technique. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 52: 400-404.
11. Glaser EM, Suter CM, Dasheiff R, Goldberg A. The human frequency following response: its behaviour during continuous and tone burst stimulation. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1976; 40: 25-32.
12. Hoormann J, Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Blank L. The human frequency-following response (FFR): normal variability and relation to the click-evoked brainstem response. Hear Res 1992; 59: 179-88.
13. Huis in't Veld F, Osterhammel P, Terkildsen K. Frequency-following auditory brainstem responses in man. Scand Audiol 1977; 6: 27-34.
14. Levi EC, Folsom RC, Dobie RA. Coherence analysis of envelope-following responses (EFRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) in infants and adults. Hear Res 1995; 89: 21-27.
15. Mardia KV. Statistics of Directional Data. London: Academic Press, 1972.
16. Mason S. On-line computer scoring of the auditory brainstem response for estimation of hearing threshold. Audiol 1984; 23: 277-96.
17. Moushegian G, Rupert AL, Stillman RD. Scalp-recorded early responses in man to frequencies in the speech range. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 35: 665-7.
18. Parker DJ, Matsebula D. The period evoked potential: a rapid technique for acquisition of phase-locked responses to continuous pure-tone stimulation. Br J Audiol 1992; 26: 335-8.
19. Stapells DR, Mackeig S, Galambos R. Auditory steady-state responses: threshold prediction using phase coherence. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 67: 260-70.
20. Wilson MJ, Dobie RA. Coherence analysis of scalp responses to amplitude-modulated tones. Acta Otolaryngol 1990; 109: 195-201.