First- and second-order motion perception in Gabor micropattern stimuli: Psychophysics and computational modelling

Cognitive Brain Research

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 263-271

  Clifford, Colin W G ^a   Freedman, Joshua N ^a   Vaina, Lucia M ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

Apparent motion; Computational model; Direction discrimination; Psychophysics; Second order motion; Visual cortex

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0031863024     PISSN: 09266410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(97)00037-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adelson E.H., Bergen J.R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J. Optical Soc. Am. A. 2:1985;284-299.
2. Boulton J.B., Baker C.L. Motion detection is dependent on spatial frequency not size. Vis. Res. 31:1991;77-87.
3. Boulton J.B., Baker C.L. Different parameters control motion perception above and below a critical density. Vis. Res. 33:1993;1803-1811.
4. Braddick O.J. A short range process in apparent motion. Vis. Res. 14:1974;519-527.
5. Britten K.H., Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T., Movshon J.A. The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. J. Neurosci. 12:1992;4745-4765.
6. Cavanagh P. Short range vs. long range motion: not a valid distinction. Spatial Vis. 5:1991;303-309.
7. Cavanagh P., Mather G. Motion: the long and the short of it. Spatial Vis. 4:1989;103-129.
8. Chubb C., Sperling G. Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. J. Optical Soc. Am. A. 5:1988;1986-2006.
9. Chubb C., Sperling G. Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distance-driven reversal of apparent motion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86:1989;2985-2989.
10. Chubb C., Sperling G. Texture quilts: basic tools for studying motion-from-texture. J. Math. Psychol. 35:1991;411-442.
11. Clifford C.W.G., Ibbotson M.R., Langley K. An adaptive Reichardt detector model of motion adaptation in insects and mammals. Visual Neurosci. 14:1997;741-749.
12. Johnston A., Clifford C.W.G. A unified account of three apparent motion illusions. Vis. Res. 35:1995;1109-1123.
13. Lu Z.-L., Sperling G. The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vis. Res. 35:1995;2697-2722.
14. Pollen D.A., Ronner S.F. Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex. Science. 212:1981;1409-1411.
15. Shapley R., Enroth-Cugell C. Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls. Prog. Retinal Res. B. 3:1984;263-346.
16. Taub E., Victor J.D., Conte M.M. Nonlinear processing in short-range motion. Vis. Res. 37:1997;1459-1477.
17. Werkhoven P., Sperling G., Chubb C. The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: a single channel theory. Vis. Res. 33:1993;463-485.
18. Wilson H.R., Ferrera V.P., Yo C. A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception. Visual Neurosci. 9:1992;79-97.