The case-time-control design: Further assumptions and conditions

Epidemiology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 441-445

  Suissa, Samy ^a  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biometry; Case control studies; Confounding by indication; Data analysis; Epidemiologic methods; Pharmacoepidemiology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; DATA ANALYSIS; PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY; POPULATION EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

EID: 0031862129     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199807000-00016     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Suissa S. The case-time-control design. Epidemiology 1995;6:248-253.
2. Miettinen OS. The need for randomization in the study of intended effects. Stat Med 1983;2:267-271.
3. Walker AM. Confounding by indication (Editorial). Epidemiology 1996;7: 335-336.
4. Greenland S. Confounding and exposure trends in case-crossover and case-time-control designs. Epidemiology 1996;7:231-239.
5. Kendall M, Stuart A, Ord JK. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. London: Charles Griffin, 1983.
6. Tukey JW. One degree of freedom for non-additivity. Biometrics 1949;5: 232-242.
7. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. Iowa City, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1980.
8. Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown, 1986.
9. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1990;351-352.