Multifocal rod electroretinograms

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 1152-1162

  Hood, Donald C ^a   Wladis, Edward J ^a   Shady, Sherif ^a   Holopigian, Karen ^b   Li, Ju ^a   Seiple, William ^b  

^a Department of Psychology Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA ROD; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0031862116     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Asher H. The electroretinogram of the blind spot. J Physiol. 1996; 37:12-40.
2. Boynton R, Riggs L. The effect of stimulus area and intensity upon the human retinal response. J Exp Psychol. 1951;42:217-226.
3. Abraham F, Alpern M. Factors influencing threshold of the fundamental electrical response to sinusoidal excitation of human photoreceptors. J Physiol. 1984;357:151-172.
4. Horiguchi M, Miyake Y, Fujii Y. Human focal rod ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:926.
5. Nusinowitz S, Birch D G, Hood DC. Rod transduction parameters from the a-wave of local receptor populations. J Opt Soc Am [A]. 1995;12:2259-2266.
6. Sandberg MA, Pawlyk BS, Berson EL. Isolation of focal rod electroretinograms from the dark-adapted human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:930-934.
7. Sutter EE. The fast m-transform: a fast computation of cross-correlations with binary m-sequences. Soc Ind Appl Math. 1991;20: 686-694.
8. Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man-I. The photopic luminance response. Vis Res. 1992;32:433-466.
9. Hood DC, Seiple W, Holopigian K, Greenstein, V. A comparison of the components of the multi-focal and full-field ERGs. Vis Neurosci. 1997;314:533-544.
10. Wu S, Sutter EE. A topographic study of oscillatory potentials in man. Vis Neurosci. 1995;12:1013-1025.
11. Baseler HA, Schneck ME, Sutter EE. Contributions of different receptor populations to multi-focal ERGs and VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37(suppl):S1061.
12. Hood DC, Holopigian K, Seiple W, et al. Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multi-focal ERG technique. Vision Res 1998;38:163-179.
13. Birch DG, Fish GE. Rod ERGs in retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:140-150.
14. Bearse MAJ, Sutter EE. Imaging localized retinal dysfunction with the multifocal electroretinogram. J Opt Soc Am [A]. 1996;13:634-640.
15. Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE. Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol. 1990;292:497-523.
16. Brindley GS, Westheimer G. The spatial properties of the human electroretinogram. J Physiol. 1965;179:518-537.
17. Keating D, Parks S, Williamson TH, Evans AL, Jay JL, Elliott AT. The effect of pupil dilation, retinal blur and filter bandwidth on the multi-focal ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37(suppl): S346.
18. Grunert U, Martin PR, Wassle H. Immunocytochemical analysis of bipolar cells in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 1994;346: 607-627.
19. Hood DC, Birch DG. The b-wave of the scotopic (rod) ERG as a measure of the activity of human on-bipolar cells. J Opt Soc Am [A]. 1996;13:623-633.
20. Bush RA, Sieving P. A proximal retinal component in the primate photopic ERG a-wave. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:635-644.
21. Frishman LJ, Sieving PA. Evidence for two sites of adaptation affecting the dark-adapted ERG of cats and primates. Vision Res. 1995;35:435-442.
22. Robson JG, Frishman LJ. Response linearity and kinetics of the cat retina: the bipolar cell component of the dark-adapted electroretinogram. Vis Neurosci. 1995;12:837-850.