Comparison and evolution of perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice after supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 594-599

  Crevier Buchman, Lise ^a   Laccourreye, Ollivier ^a   Wuyts, Floris L ^b   Monfrais Pfauwadel, Marie Claude ^a   Pillot, Claire ^a   Brasnu, Daniel ^a  

^a Hopital Laennec   (France)

^b ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Acoustic parameters; Partial laryngectomy; Perceptual evaluation; Quality of voice

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LARYNGECTOMY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH REHABILITATION; VOICE;

CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; GLOTTIS; HUMANS; HYOID BONE; LARYNGEAL CARTILAGES; LARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; LARYNGECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; TIME FACTORS; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 0031858712     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016489850154784     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Piquet JJ, Desaulty A, Decroix G. Crico-hyoidoépiglotto-pexie. Technique opératoire et résultats fonctionnels. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1974; 91: 681-9.
2. Laccourreye H, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Menard M, Brasnu D. Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy: a partial laryngeal procedure for glottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 421-6.
3. Laccourreye O, Weinstein GS, Brasnu D, Bassot V, Cauchois R, Jouffre V, et al. A clinical trial of continuous Cisplatin-Fluorouracil induction chemotherapy and supracricoid partial laryngectomy for glottic carcinoma classified as T2. Cancer 1994; 74; 2781-90.
4. Chevalier D, Laccoureye O, Brasnu D, Laccourreye H, Piquet JJ. Cricohyoidoepiglotopexy for glottic carcinoma with fixation or impaired motion of the true vocal cord: 5-year oncologic results with 112 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106: 364-9.
5. Laccourreye O, Muscatello L, Laccourreye L, Naudo Ph, Brasnu D, Weinstein GS. Supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoido-epiglottopexy for "early" glottic carcinoma classified as T1-T2N0 invading the anterior commissure. Am J Otolaryngol 1997; 18: 1-7.
6. Crevier-Buchman L, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Garcia D, Jouffre V, Brasnu D. Evolution of speech and voice following supracricoid partial laryngectomy. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109: 410-3.
7. Laccourreye O, Crevier-Buchman L, Weinstein G, Biacabe B, Laccourreye H, Brasnu D. Duration and frequency characteristics of speech and voice following supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104: 516-21.
8. Baken RJ. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. Ed: Pro-ed, Austin, Texas. 1987.
9. Wolfe V, Cornell R, Palmer C. Acoustic correlates of voice types. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 509-16.
10. Rabinov RC, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Bielamowicz S. Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measures of jitter. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 26-32.
11. Hammarberg B, Fritzell B, Gauffin J, Sundberg J, Wedin L. Perceptual and acoustic correlates of abnormal voice qualities. Acta Otolaryngol 1980; 90: 441-51.
12. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer. T.N.M. Staging classification system. Ed.: Springer-Verlag, Paris. 1987. (4th edition).
13. Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer Verlag, 1981.
14. Rydell R, Schalen L, Fex S, Einer A. Voice evaluation before and after Laser excision vs. radiotherapy of T1A glottic carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1995; 115: 560-5.
15. Dejonckere P, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 1996; 117: 219-24.
16. Schoentgen J. Jitter in sustained vowels and isolated sentences produced by dysphonic speakers. Speech Com 1989; 8: 61-79.
17. De Krom G. Consistency and reliability of voice quality ratings for different types of speech fragments. J Speech Hear Res 1994; 37: 985-1000.
18. Karnell MP, Scherer RS, Fischer LB. Comparison of acoustic voice perturbation measures among three independent voice laboratories. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 781-90.
19. Bielamowicz S, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Dauer MS, Berke GS. Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 126-34.
20. De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH, Croux C. Test-retest study of GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice 1997; 11: 74-80.
21. Takahashi H, Koike Y. Some perceptual dimensions and acoustical correlates of pathological voices. Acta Oto-Laryngol 1975; Suppl 338.
22. Hirano M, Hibi S, Yoshida T, Hirade Y, Kasuya H, Kikuchi Y. Acoustic analysis of pathological voice. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1988; 105: 432-8.
23. Wolfe V, Ratusnik D. Acoustic and perceptual measurements of roughness influencing judgements of pitch. J Speech Hear Dis 1988; 53: 15-22.
24. Smith BE, Weinberg B, Feth LL, Horii Y. Vocal roughness and jitter characteristics of vowels produced by esophageal speakers. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 240-9.