Female voice communications in high levels of aircraft cockpit noises- Part I: Spectra, levels, and microphones

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 675-683

  Nixon, C W ^a,b   Morris, L J ^a   Mccavitt, A R ^a   Mckinley, R L ^a   Anderson, T R ^a   Mcdaniel, M P ^a   Yeager, D G ^a  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b WRIGHT PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIRCRAFT; AIRCRAFT NOISE; AIRPLANE CREW; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MICROPHONE; NOISE REDUCTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND INTENSITY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; VOICE;

ADULT; AVIATION; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MILITARY PERSONNEL; NOISE; SEX FACTORS; SPEECH; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 0031858167     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Air Force Occupational Safety, and Health. Hazardous noise. Washington, DC: GPO, 1993; AFOSH Std. 48-19.
2. ASA. American National Standard Method for the Measurement of Real-ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors. New York: ASA Standards Secretariat; ANSI S12.6-1984 (R 1990).
3. ASA. American National Standard Method for Measuring the Intelligibility of Speech over Communication Systems. New York: ASA Standards Secretariat; ANSI S3.2-1989 (ASA 85).
4. Box GE, Hunter WG, Hunter JS. Statistics for experimenters. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1978.
5. Fletcher H. Speech, and hearing in communication. New York: D Van Nostrand Company, Inc., 1953
6. Garinther GR, Whitaker LA, Peters LJ. The effects of speech intelligibility on military performance. In: Nixon C, ed. Symposium on speech communication metrics and human performance. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Armstrong Laboratory, AFMC, 1995:72-82; AL/CF-SR-1995-0023.
7. McKinley RL. Voice communication research and evaluation system. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1980; AMRL-TR-80-25.
8. Moore TJ, Nixon CW, McKinley RL. Comparative intelligibility of speech materials processed by standard air force communications systems in the presence of simulated cockpit noise. AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 311, Aural Simulated Communication in Aviation, June 1981.
9. Nixon CW. Voice communications and positive pressure breathing. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, 1984; AFAMRL-TR-84-009.
10. Nixon CW, McKinley RL, Steuver JW. Performance of active noise reduction headsets. In: Dancer A, et al., eds. Noise-induced hearing loss. St Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1992.
11. Occupational Safety, and Health Administration (OSHA). Occupational Noise Exposure, Hearing Conservation Amendment. Fed Regist 1983; 48(46):9738-9785.
12. Payne DG, Wenger MJ. Speech intelligibility effects in a dual task environment. In: Nixon C, ed. Symposium on speech communication metrics and human performance. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Armstrong Laboratory, AFMC, 1995:41-71; AL/CF-SR-1995-0023.