Letters to the editor

Eye (Basingstoke)

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 486-488

  Winder, S ^a   Noble, D W ^a   Sim, M J ^a   Church, W H ^a  

^a ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATARACT EXTRACTION; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LETTER; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; NOCICEPTION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERIBULBAR ANESTHESIA; RATING SCALE; RETROBULBAR ANESTHESIA;

EID: 0031855980     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/eye.1998.115     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Briggs ME, Beck AC, Esakowitz L. Sub-Tenon’s versus peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery. Eye 1997;11:639-43.
2. Royal College of Anaesthetists and College of Ophthalmologists. Report of the Joint Working Party on Anaesthesia in Ophthalmic Surgery, 1993.
3. Roman SJ, Sit DAC, Boureau CM, Auclin FX. Sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia: an efficient and safe technique. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:673-6.
4. Hay A, Flynn HW, Hoffman JE, Rivera AM. Needle penetration of the globe during retrobulbar and peribulbar injection. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1017-24.
5. Kershner RM. Topical anaesthesia for small incision self-sealing cataract surgery: a prospective evaluation of the first 100 patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993;19:290-2.