Employment and other macroeconomic benefits of an innovation-led climate strategy for the United States

Energy Policy

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 425-432

  Laitner, Skip ^a   Bernow, Stephen ^b   Decicco, John ^c  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b TELLUS INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Amer Cncl An Ener Efficient Econ   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE POLICY; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ECONOMIC IMPACT; EMPLOYMENT GENERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS;

USA;

EID: 0031855294     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00160-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ackerman F Still dead after all these years. interpreting the failure of general equilibrium theory:1997;Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University, MA.
2. Amano A On some integrated assessment modeling debates. 1997;IPCC Asia-Pacific Workshop on Integrated Assessment Models. United Nations University, Tokyo.
3. ASE Energy Innovations. A Prosperous Path to a Clean Environment, 1997:1997;Alliance to Save Energy, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Natural Resources Defense Council, Tellus Institute, and Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC.
4. 2 Emissions. Centre for the Management of Environmental Resources (CMER), INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.
5. Bernstein, P M, David Montgomery, W and Rutherford, T F (1997) World economic impacts of U.S. commitments to medium term carbon emissions limits. Prepared for the American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC.
6. BLS (1996) Outlook 1995-2005 (as downloaded from the BLS FTP site 〈ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/ep〉). Bureau of Labour Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.
7. Dowlatabadi, H (1997) Sensitivity of climate change mitigation estimates to assumptions about technical change. Center for Integrated Study of the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University. a Special issue of Energy Economics, eds. C. Carrera and J.C. Hourcade, forthcoming.
8. DeCanio S J Economic modeling and the false tradeoff between environmental protection and economic growth. 1996;Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara.
9. Elliott R N, Laitner S, Pye M Considerations in the Estimation of Costs and Benefits of Industrial Energy Efficiency Projects. 1997;American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC.
10. Hanson, D A (1997) Impacts of policy bundles needed to reduce energy-related carbon emissions. A presentation to the Air and Waste Management Association Meetings in Toronto, Canada, June 8-12, 1997. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
11. EMF 13 (1996) Markets for Energy Efficiency. Energy Modeling Forum, Report 13. Stanford University.
12. Geller, H, DeCicco, J and Laitner, S (1992) Energy Efficiency and Job Creation. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC.
13. Greening, L A (1997) Depiction of capital, investment, and technological change in a computable equilibrium framework. A working memo prepared for EPA"s Office of Atmospheric Programs, Washington, DC.
14. 2 emissions abatement. Energy Policy. 25(2):1997;159-172.
15. Krause, F (1994a) Top-down and bottom-up methods for calculating the cost of carbon reductions; an economic assessment. Draft Contribution to Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
16. Krause, F (1994b) Economic efficiency and "normal" energy service markets. Draft background document submitted to Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
17. Laitner S Energy efficiency as a productivity strategy for the United States. 1995;Economic Research Associates, Alexandria, VA.
18. Laitner S WYMIWYG (What You Measure is What You Get). The benefits of technology investment as a climate change policy:1997;Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Washington, DC.
19. Laitner S, DeCicco J, Elliott N, Geller H, Goldberg M, Mowris R, Nadel S Energy Efficiency and Economic Development in the Midwest. 1995;American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC.
20. IMPLAN Micro IMPLAN User's Guide. 1993;Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Stillwater, MN.
21. Miller R E, Blair P D Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Exstensions. 1985;25-30 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
22. OTA (1993) Industrial Energy Efficiency, p. 65. Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States, Washington, DC.
23. Peters, I, (1997) Technological change and optimality in computable general equilibrium models. Human Ecology Division (EAWAG), Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, Duebendorf.
24. Repetto R, Austin D The Costs of Climate Protection. A Guide for the Perplexed:1997;World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
25. Schneider S H, Goulder L H Achieving low cost emissions targets. Nature. 389:1997;13-14.