Habitat use by western pond turtles in the Trinity River, California

Journal of Wildlife Management

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 842-853

  Reese, Devin A ^a,b,c   Welsh Jr , Hartwell H ^a  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Clemmys marmorata; Damming; Habitat use; Northern California; Trinity River; Western pond turtles

Indexed keywords

DAM CONSTRUCTION; HABITAT USE; RIVER; TURTLE;

CALIFORNIA; TRINITY RIVER; USA;

BATAGUR; CLEMMYS MARMORATA; EMYDIDAE; MARMORATA; TESTUDINES;

EID: 0031855099     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3802535     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BOYER, D. R. 1965. Ecology of the basking habit in turtles. Ecology 46:99-118.
2. BRATTSTROM, B. H. 1965. Body temperatures of reptiles. American Midland Naturalist 73:376-422.
3. BURY, R. B. 1972. Habits and home range of the Pacific pond turtle (Clemmys marmorata) in a stream community. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
4. COSTANZA, M. C., AND A. A. AFIFI. 1979. Comparison of stopping rules in forward discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 777-785.
5. DODD, C. K., JR. 1990. Effects of habitat fragmentation on a stream-dwelling species, the flattened musk turtle, Sternotherus depressus. Biological Conservation 54:33-45.
6. FLINT, R. F. 1957. Glacial and pleistocene geology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.
7. HAMPTON, M. A. 1995. Current status of fish habitat. Pages 4-6 in R. L. Ridenhour, editor. Proceedings from the Trinity River restoration program colloquium. American Fisheries Society, Weaverville, California, USA.
8. HOLLAND, D. C. 1985. An ecological and quantitative study of the western pond turtle (Clemmys marmorata) in San Luis Obispo County, California. Thesis, California State University, Fresno, California, USA.
9. _. 1992. Level and pattern in morphological variation: a phylogeographic study of the western pond turtle (Clemmys marmorata). Dissertation, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA.
10. _, AND R. B. BURY. In press. Clemmys marmorata (Baird and Girard 1852) western pond turtle. in P. C. Pritchard and A. C. Rhodin, editors. Conservation biology of freshwater turtles, volume 2.
11. JAMES, F. C., AND C. E. MCCULLOCH. 1990. Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: panacea or pandora's box. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:129-66.
12. JENNINGS, M. R., AND M. P. HAYES. 1994. Amphibian and reptile species of special concern in California. California Department of Fish and Game technical report, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova, California, USA.
13. LEFEVRE, K., AND R. J. BROOKS. 1995. Effects of sex and body size on basking behavior in a northern population of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Herpetologica 51:217-224.
14. LEVINS, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. USA.
15. LORD, J. M., AND D. A. NORTON. 1990. Scale and the spatial concept of fragmentation. Conservation Biology 4:197-202.
16. PETTS, G. E. 1984. Impounded rivers: perspectives for ecological management. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.
17. POFF, N. L., J. D. ALLAN, M. B. BAIN, J. R. KARR, K. L. PRESTEGAARD, B. D. RICHTER, R. E. SPARKS, AND J. C. STROMBERG. 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience 47:769-784.
18. REESE, D. A. 1996. Comparative demography and habitat use of western pond turtles in northern California: the effects of damming and related alterations. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
19. _, AND H. H. WELSH, JR. 1998. Comparative demography of western pond turtle (Clemmys marmorata) populations in two forks of the Trinity River of California in the context of dam-induced alterations. Journal of Herpetology 32:in press.
20. RENCHER, A. C. 1992. Interpretation of canonical discriminant functions, canonical variates, and principal components. American Statistician 46:217-225.
21. SAS INSTITUTE. 1989. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 6. Fourth edition. Volume 1. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
22. SCHRADER-FRECHETTE, K. S., AND E. C. MCCOY. 1993. Method in ecology: strategies for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
23. SILVERMAN, B. W. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York, USA.
24. STEBBINS, R. C. 1985. Field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
25. STEVENS, J. 1986. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, USA.
26. TITUS, K., J. A. MOSER, AND B. K. WILLIAMS, 1984. Chance-corrected classification for use in discriminant analysis: ecological applications. American Midland Naturalist 111:1-7.
27. TOFT, C. A. 1991. Reply to Seaman and Jaeger: an appeal to common sense. Herpetologica 46:357-361.
28. _, AND P. J. SHEA. 1983. Detecting community-wide patterns: estimating power strengthens statistical inference. American Naturalist 122:618-625.
29. WILLIAMS, G. P., AND M. G. WOLMAN. 1984. Downstream effects of dams on alluvial rivers. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1286.
30. ZAR, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Second edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.