Management and restoration ecology of the federal threatened mead's milkweed, Asclepias meadii (Asclepiadaceae)

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 110-125

  Bowles, M L ^b   McBride, J L ^b   Betz, R F ^a  

^a MORTON ARBORETUM   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASCLEPIAS MEADII;

EID: 0031854815     PISSN: 00266493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2992001     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (57)

1. Alexander, H. M., N. S. Slacle & W. D. Kettle. 1997. Application of mark-recapture models to estimation of the population size of plants. Ecology 78: 1230-1237.
2. Beals, E. W. 1984. Bray-Curtis ordination: An effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Advances Ecol. Res. 14: 1-55.
3. Betz, R. F. 1989. Ecology of Mead's milkweed (Asclepias meadii Torrey). Pp. 187-191 in T. B. Bragg & J. Stubbendieck (editors). Proceedings of the Eleventh North American Prairie Conference. Univ. Nebraska at Lincoln.
4. _ & J. F. Lamp. 1989. Species composition of old settler silt-loam cemetery prairies. Pp. 33-39 in T. B. Bragg & J. Stubbendieck (editors), Proceedings of the Eleventh North American Prairie Conference. Univ. Nebraska at Lincoln.
5. -, R. D. Struven, J. E. Wall & F. B. Heitler. 1994. Insect pollinators of 12 milkweed (Asclepiax) species. Pp. 45-60 in Proceedings of the Thirteenth North American Prairie Conference. R. G,. Wickelt, P. D. Lewis, A. Woodliiffe & P. Pratt (editors), Department of Parks & Recreation, Windsor. Ontario, Canada.
6. Bliss, L. C. & G. W. Cox. 1964. Plant community structure and soil variation within a northern Indiana prairie. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 72: 115-128.
7. Bowles, M. L. & J. McBride. 1996. Pitcher's thistle (Cirsium pilcheri) reintroduction. Pp. 423-431 in D. A. Falk, C. I. Millar & M. Olwell (editors), Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants. Island Press. Washington, D.C.
8. _ & C. J. Whelan (editors), 1994. Restoration of Endangered Species: Conceptual Issues, Planning, and Implementation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
9. _, R. F. Betz & M. M. DeMauro. 1993a. Propagation of rare plants from historic seed collections: Implications for species restoration and herbarium management. Restoration Ecol. 1: 101-106.
10. _, R. Flakne, K. McEachern & N. Pavlovic. 1993b. Recovery planning and reintroduction of the federally threatened Pitcher's thistle (Cirsium pitcheri) in Illinois. Natural Areas J. 13: 164-176.
11. Broyles, S. B. & R. Wyatt. 1991. Effective pollen dispersal in a natural population of Asclepias exallaln: The influence of pollinator behavior, genetic similarity, and mating success. Amer. Naturalist 138: 1239-1249.
12. _ & _. 1993. The consequences ol self-pollination in Asclepias exaltata, a self-incompatible milkweed. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 41-44.
13. Carr, D. E. & M. R. Dudash. 1996. Inbreeding depression in two species of Mimulis (Scropbulariaceae) with contrasting mating systems. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 586-593.
14. Collins, S. L. & D. J. Gibson. 1990. Effects of fire on community structure in tallgrass and mixed grass prairie. Pp. 81-98 in S. L. Collins & L. L. Wallace (editors), Eire in North American Tallgrass Prairie. Univ. Oklahoma Press. Norman.
15. _ & S. M. Glenn. 1988. Disturbance and community structure in North American prairies. Pp. 131 -143 in H. During, M. Werger & J. Willems (editors), Diversity and Pattern in Plant Communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.
16. _ & L. L. Wallace (editors). 1990. Fire in North American Tallgrass Prairie. Univ. Oklahoma Press. Norman.
17. DeMauro, M. M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the Lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. gtfihra). Conservation Biol. 7: 542-550.
18. _. 1994. Development and implementation of a recovery program for the federal threatened Lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabrn). Pp. 298-321 in M. L. Bowles & C. J. Whelan (editors), Restoration of Endangered Species: Conceptual Issues, Planning, and Implementation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
19. Dudash, M. R. 1990. Relative fitness of selfed and out-crossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species. Sabalia angularis L (Gentianaceae) in three environments. Evolution 44: 1129-1139.
20. Evans, E. W., J. M. Briggs, E. J. Finck, D. J. Gibson, S. W. James, D. W. Kaufman & T. R. Seastedt. 1989. Is fire a disturbance in grasslands? Pp. 159-160 in T. B. Bragg & J. Stubbendieck (editors), Proceedings of the Eleventh North American Prairie Conference. Univ. Nebraska at Lincoln.
21. Fay, P. A. & A. K. Knapp. 1993. Pliotosynthetic and stomatal responses of Avena Sativa (Poaceae) to a vanable light environment. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 1369-1373.
22. Fenster, C. B. & M. R. Dudash. 1994. Genetic considerations for plant population restoration and conservation. Pp. 34-62 in M. L. Bowles & C. J. Whelan (editors). Restoration of Endangered Species: Conceptual Issues, Planning, and Implementation. Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge. U.K.
23. Fitch, H. S. & E. R. Hall. 1978. A 20-year record of succession on reseeded fields of tallgrass prairie on the Rockefeller Experimental Tract. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas 4: 1-15.
24. Gilpin, M. U & M. E. Soulé. 1986. Minimum viable populations: Processes of species extinction. Pp. 19-34 in M. E. Soulé (editor), Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer, Simderland, Massachusetts.
25. Guerrant, E. O., Jr. 1996. Designing populations: Demographic, genetic, and horticultural dimensions. Pp. 171-207 in D. A. Falk. C. I. Millar & M. Olwell (editors), Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
26. Gurevitch, J. 1986. Competition and the local distribution of the grass Stipa neomexicana. Ecology 67: 46-57.
27. Harrison, W. F. 1988. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Determination of threatened status for Asclepias mradii (Mead's milkweed). Fed. Reg. 53: 33982-33994.
28. Heywood, J. S. & D. A. Levin. 1985. Associations between allozyme frequencies and soils characteristics in Guilltirdia pulthella (Compositae). Evolution 39: 1076-1086.
29. Hook, P. B., W. K. Lauenroth & I. C. Burke. 1994. Spatial patterns of roots in a semiarid grassland: Abundance of canopy openings and regeneration gaps. J. Ecol. 82: 485-494.
30. Kahn, A. P. & D. H. Morse. 1991. Polliniun germination and putative ovule penetration in self-and cross-pollinated common milkweed Asclepias syriaca. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 126: 61-71.
31. Kephart, S. R. 1981. Breeding systems in Asclepias incarnata, A. syriaca, & A. verticillata. Amer. J. Bot. 68: 226-232.
32. Lacy, R. C. 1987. Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: Interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conservation Biol. 1: 143-158.
33. _. 1994. Managing genetic diversity in captive populations of animals. Pp. 63-89 in M. L. Bowles & C. J. Whelan (editors), Restoration of Endangered Species: Conceptual Issues, Planning, and Implementation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
34. Lande, R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455-1460.
35. Les, D. H., J. A. Reinhartz & E. J. Esselman. 1991. Genetic consequences of rarity in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae), a threatened, self-incompatible plant. Evolution 45: 1641-1650.
36. Louda, S. M., M. A. Potvin & S. K. Collinge. 1990. Predispersal seed predation, postdispersal seed predation and competition in the recruitment of seedlings of a native thistle in sand hills prairie. Amer. Midi. Naturalist 124: 105-113.
37. McCune, B. 1993. Multivariate analysis on the PC-ORD system. Oregon State University, Corvalis.
38. McGregor, R. L. 1977. Rare native vascular plants of Kansas. Techn. Publ. State Biol. Surv. Kansas 5: 1-44.
39. Menges, E. S. 1986. Predicting the future of rare plant populations: Demographic monitoring and modelling. Nat. Areas J. 6: 13-25.
40. _. 1991. The application of minimum viable population theory to plants. Pp. 45-61 in D. A. Falk & K. E. Holsinger (editors), Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
41. _. 1992. Stochastic modeling of extinction in plant populations. Pp. 253-275 in P.L. Fiedler & S. K. Jain (editors), Conservation Biology: The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation. Chapman & Hall. New York.
42. Page, A. L., K. H. Miller & D. R. Keeny (editors). 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbial Properties, 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy & Soil Science Society of America, Madison. Wisconsin.
43. Pavlik, B. M. 1994. Demographic monitoring and the recovery of endangered plant populations. Pp. 322-350 in M. L. Bowles & C. J. Whelan (editors), Restoration of Endangered Species: Conceptual Issues, Planning, and Implementation. Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge, U.K.
44. _. 1996. Defining and measuring success. Pp. 127-155 in D. A. Falk. C. I. Millar & M. Olwell (editors), Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Fndangered Plants. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
45. Schaal, B. A., W. J. Leverich & S. H. Rogstad. 1991. A comparison of methods for assessing genetic variation in plant conservation biology. Pp. 123-134 in D. A. Falk & K. E. Holsinger (editors), Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
46. Schramm, P. 1992. Prairie restoration: A twenty-five year perspective on establishment and management. Pp. 69-177 in D. D. Smith & C. A. Jacobs (editors), Proceedings of the Twelfth North American Prairie Conference. Univ. Northern Iowa. Cedar Falls.
47. Shannon, T. R. & R. Wyatt. 1986. Pollen germinability of Asclepias exdltata: Effects of flower age, drying time, and pollen source. Syst. Bot. 11: 322-325.
48. Smith, T. 1997. Management Guidelines for Mead's milkweed (Asclepias meadii Torrey ex A. Gray). Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri.
49. Sneath, P. H. A. & R. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
50. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman. New York.
51. Steele, R. G. D. & J. H. Torrie. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill. New York.
52. Tecic, D. L., J. L. McBride. M. L. Bowles & D. L. Nickrent. 1998. Genetic variability in the federal threatened Mead's milkweed, Asclepias meadii Torrey (Asclepiadaceae) as determined by allozyme electrophoresis. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 97-109.
53. Weller, S. 1994. The relationship of rarity to plant reproductive biology. Pp. 90-117 in M. L. Bowles & C. J. WhelaM (editors), Restoration of Endangered Species: Conceptual Issues, Planning, and Implementation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
54. White, P. S. 1996. Spatial and biological scales in reinlroduclion. Pp. 49-86 in D. A. Falk, C. I. Millar & M. Olwell (editors), Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
55. Willson, M. F. & P. W. Price. 1980. Resource limitation of fruit and seed production in some Asclepias species. Canad. J. Bot. 58: 2229-2233.
56. Wyatt, R. 1976. Pollination and fruit-set in Asclepias: A reappraisal. Amer. J. Bot. 63: 845-851.
57. _ & S. B. Broyles. 1994. Ecology and evolution of reproduction in milkweeds. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 423-441.