Citizen advisory groups in remedial action planning: Paper tiger or key to success?

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 337-354

  Knaap, Gerrit J ^a   Matier, Debra ^a   Olshansky, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CITIZEN ADVISORY GROUP; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS;

NORTH AMERICA, GREAT LAKES;

EID: 0031854447     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640569811623     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. American Planning Association (1997) Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook: Model Statutes for Planning and the Management of Change, Phase I interim edition (Chicago, IL, APA Press).
2. Arnstein, S.R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, July, pp. 216-224.
3. Becker, M.L. (1993) The International Joint Commission and public participation: past experiences, present challenges, and future tasks, Natural Resources Journal, 33(2), pp. 235-274.
4. Blahna, D.J. & Yonts-Shepard, S. (1989) Public involvement in resource planning: toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation, Society and Natural Resources, 21, pp. 209-227.
5. Bollens, J. & Schmandt, H. (1982) The Metropolis (New York, Harper & Row).
6. Born, S.M. & Sonzogni, W.C. (1995) Integrated environmental management: strengthening the conceptualization, Environmental Management, 19(2), pp. 167-181.
7. Brown, D. (1972) The management of advisory committees, Public Administration Review, 32(4), pp. 334-342.
8. Caldwell, L. (1988) Perspectives on Ecosystem Management for the Great Lakes (Albany, NY, SUNY Press).
9. Center for the Great Lakes (1992) Making RAPS Happen: Financing and Managing Cleanups at Great Lakes Areas of Concern (Chicago, IL, Center for the Great Lakes).
10. Daniels, S.E., Lawrence, R.L. & Alig, R.J. (1996) Decision-making and ecosystem-based management: applying the Vroom-Yetton model to public participation strategy, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, pp. 13-30.
11. Fiorino, D.J. (1990) Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms, Science, Technology & Human Values, 15(2), pp. 226-243.
12. Hartig, J.H. & Thomas, R.L. (1988) Development of plans to restore degraded areas in the Great Lakes, Environmental Management, 12(3), pp. 327-347.
13. Hartig, J.H. & Law, N.L. (1993) Institutional Frameworks to Direct the Development and Implementation of Remedial Action Plans (Detroit, MI, Wayne State University, Department of Chemical Engineering).
14. Hartig, J.H., Lovett-Doust, L. & Seidl, P. (1990) Successes and challenges in developing and implementing remedial action plans to restore degraded areas of the Great Lakes, International & Transboundary Water Resources Issues, April, pp. 269-277.
15. Hartig, J.H. & Zarull, M. (1991) Methods of restoring degraded areas in the Great Lakes, Reviews of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology, 117, pp. 127-154.
16. Hartig, J.H. & Zarull, M. (1992) Under RAPs: Towards Grassroots Ecological Democracy in the Great Lakes Basin (Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press).
17. Heberlein, T.A. (1976) Some observations on alternative mechanisms for public involvement: the hearing, public opinion poll, the workshop, and the quasi-experiment, Natural Resource Journal, 16, pp. 197-212.
18. Henderson, L.J. (1990) Metropolitan governance: citizen participation in the urban federation, National Civic Review, 79(2), 105-117.
19. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Final Stage I and II Report: Waukegan Harbor Remedial Action Plan (Springfield, IL, IEPA).
20. Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) (1997) Remedial Action Plan Stage II Draft (Indianapolis, IN, IDEM).
21. International Joint Commission (IJC) (1978) The Ecosystem Approach - Scope and Implications of an Ecosystem Approach to Transboundary Problems in the Great Lakes Basin (Windsor, Ontario, Great Lakes, Advisory Board).
22. International Joint Commission (1994) Revised Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978, as amended by Protocol signed November 18 1987 (Windsor, Ontario, Office of Consolidation).
23. Kauffman, K. & Shorett, A. (1977) A perspective on public involvement in water management decision making, Public Administration Review, September/October, pp. 467-471.
24. Kaiser, E., Godschalk, D. & Stuart Chapin, F. (1995) Urban Land Use Planning, 4th edition (Urbana, IL, University of Illinois Press).
25. Kellogg, W.A. (1992) The power of an idea: ecosystem-based planning in the Great Lakes Basin, presented at meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, October (Columbus, OH).
26. Landre, B.K., Knuth, D.A. & O'Neil, C.R. (1990) Public participation in Great Lakes remedial action planning, Final Report, Project No. 88-004 (Brockport, NY, New York Sea Grant Extension Program).
27. Lee, B.J., Regier, H.A. & Rapport, D.J. (1982) Ten ecosystem approaches to the planning and management of the Great Lakes, Journal of Great Lakes Research, 8(3), 505-519.
28. Lienesch, W.C. & Emisio, G.A. (1976) Planning for implementation under Section 208, Journal of the Water Resources Planning & Management Division, November, pp. 283-296.
29. Lustig, T.D. (1978) Implementation of Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Architecture and Planning, Environmental Impact Assessment Project).
30. MacKenzie, S.H. (1996) Integrated Resource Management: The Ecosystem Approach in the Great Lakes Basin (Washington, DC, Island Press).
31. Majone, G. & Wildavsky, A. (1977) Implementation as evolution, Policy Studies Review Annual, 2, pp. 103-117.
32. Margerum, R.D. & Born, S.M. (1995) Integrated environmental management: moving from theory to practice, Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 38(3), pp. 371-391.
33. Morrow, W. (1980) Public Administration: Politics, Policy, and the Political System (New York, Random House).
34. Moskowitz, H.S. (1994) Who plans? A look at who sits on New Jersey planning boards, Newsletter of the New Jersey Chapter of the American Planning Association, 2(2), p. 2.
35. Pumlee, J.P., Starling, J.D. & Kramer, K.W. (1985) Citizen participation in water quality planning: a case study of perceived failure, Administration & Society, 16(4), pp. 455-473.
36. Rosenbaum, W. (1976) The paradoxes of public participation, Administration & Society, 8(3), pp. 355-383.
37. Sampson, F.B. & Knopf, F.L. (1996) Ecosystem Management (New York, Springer-Verlag).
38. Sanders, W. & Getzels, J. (1987) The Planning Commission: its composition and function, Planning Advisory Service Report No. 400 (Chicago, IL, American Planning Association).
39. Schaller, L.E. (1964) Is the Citizen Advisory Committee a threat to representative government?, Public Administration Review, 24(3), pp. 175-179.
40. Scott, M. (1971) American City Planning Since 1890 (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).
41. Thomas, J.C. (1995) Public Participation in Public Decisions (San Francisco, CA, Josey-Bass).
42. US General Accounting Office (1990) Water pollution: improved coordination needed to clean up the Great Lakes, GAO/RCED-90-197, (Washington, DC, US GAO).
43. Wannop, U.A. (1995) The Regional Imperative: Regional Planning and Governance in Britain, Europe and the United States (London, Jessica Kingsley).
44. Wilkens, L.R. (1980) The implementation of water pollution control measures - Section 208 of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments, Land & Water Law Review, 15(2), pp. 479-502.
45. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (1993) Lower Green Bay Remedial Action Plan 1993 Update (Madison, WI, WDNR).
46. Zimmerman, R. (1980) From planning to effective management: problems in transition, in: B. T. Lamb (Ed) Water Quality Administration: A Focus on Section 208, pp. 41-57 (Ann Arbor MI, Ann Arbor Science).