Indirect tests of the spatial mismatch hypothesis in the Cleveland PMSA: A labor market perspective

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 712-723

  Zhang, Zhongcai ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL LOCATION; LABOUR MARKER; METROPOLITAN AREA; SPATIAL MISMATCH; URBAN ECONOMY;

USA, OHIO, CLEVELAND;

EID: 0031852174     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107808749803300505     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Bartik, T. J. 1991. Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamazoo, MI: Upjoin Institute for Employment Research.
2. Blackley, Paul R. 1990. Spatial mismatch in urban labor markets: Evidence from large U.S. metropolitan areas. Social Science Quarterly 71 (1):39-52.
3. Cooke, T. J. 1993. Proximity to job opportunities and African American male unemployment: A test of the spatial mismatch hypothesis in Indianapolis. Professional Geographer 45 (4):407-15.
4. Gorden, P., A. Kumar, and H. W. Richardson. 1989. The spatial mismatch hypothesis: Some new evidence. Urban Studies 26:315-26.
5. Hildebrand, D. K., and L. Ott. 1991. Statistical thinking for managers. Boston: PWS-KENT.
6. Hill, E. W., and H. L. Wolman. 1997. Accounting for the change in income disparities between US central cities and their suburbs from 1980 to 1990. Urban Studies 34 (1):43-60.
7. Holzer, H. J. 1991. The spatial mismatch hypothesis: What has the evidence shown? Urban Studies 28:105-22.
8. Holzer, H. J., and K. R. Ihlanfeldt. 1996. Spatial factors and the employment of blacks at the firm level. New England Economic Review, May/June, 65-82.
9. Holzer, H. J., and W. Vroman. 1992. Mismatches and the urban labor market. In Urban labor markets and job opportunity, edited by G. E. Peterson and W. Vroman, 81-104. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
10. Ihlanfeldt, K. R. 1994. The spatial mismatch between jobs and residential locations within urban areas. Cityscape 1 (1):219-44.
11. Jencks, C., and S. E. Mayer. 1990. Residential segregation, job proximity, and black job opportunities. In Inner-city poverty in the United States, edited by L. E. Lynn Jr., and M. M. McGreary, 187-222. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
12. Kain, J. F. 1968. Housing segregation, Negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics 82:175-97.
13. Ohio Department of Taxation. 1995. Tax data series: Municipal income taxes. Columbus: Ohio Department of Taxation.
14. Packer, A. H., and J. G. Wirt. 1992. Changing skills in the U.S. work force: Trends of supply and demand. In Urban labor markets and job opportunity, edited by G. E. Peterson and W. Vroman, 31-63. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
15. Peterson, G. E., and W. Vroman. 1992. Urban labor markets and economic opportunity. In Urban labor markets and job opportunity, edited by G. E. Peterson and W. Vroman, 1-29. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.