Socket wear in ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties: Fixed versus rotating heads

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 248-252

  Van Der Vis, Harm M ^a,d   Zwartelé, Rob ^b   Schüller, Hans M ^c   Doets, H Kees ^b   Marti, René K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b SLOTERVAART HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d Ziekenhuis Hilversum   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP DISEASE; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TIME; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0031850607     PISSN: 00016470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453679809000924     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bankston A B, Ritter M A, Keating E M, Fans P M. Measurement of polyethylene thickness in total hip arthroplasty. A technique analysis. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9 (5): 533-8.
2. Bos I, Meeuwssen E, Henssge E J, Lohrs U. Differences in polyethylene wear in hip joint prostheses with ceramicand with metal-polyethylene combination of the articulation surfaces - a study of surgical and of autopsy materials (German). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1991; 129 (6): 507-15.
3. Buchhorn U, Willert H G, Semlitsch M, Weber H. Dimensional changes of polyethylene acetabuli in Muller's hip endoprosthesis. Report on measurement methods and their clinical significance (German). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1984; 122(2): 127-35.
4. Charnley J, Cupic Z. The nine- and ten-year results of the low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 1973; 95: 9-25.
5. Charnley J, Halley D K. Rate of wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1975; 112: 170-9.
6. Clarke I C, Gruen T, Matos M, Amstutz H C. Improved methods for quantitative radiographic evaluation with particular reference to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1976; 121: 83-91.
7. Clarke I C, Gustafson A, Jung H, Fujisawa A. Hip-simulator ranking of polyethylene wear: comparisons between ceramic heads of different sizes. Acta Orthop Scand 1996; 67 (2): 128-32.
8. Dall D M, Learmonth I D, Solomon M. A scoring system to determine radiological loosening in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 1992; 16 (4): 339-43.
9. Egli A, Weber B G, Sieber H, Semlitsch M, Dorre E. Experience with the pairing of polyethylene/ceramic materials in hip endoprostheses.. In: Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene as biomaterial in orthopaedic surgery (Eds. Willert H G, Buchhom G H, Eyerer P). Hogrefe and Huber, Toronto 1991; 6: 154-8.
10. Franzén H, Mjöberg B. Wear and loosening of the hip prosthesis. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric 3-year study of 14 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61 (6): 499-501.
11. Goergen T G, Resnick D. Evaluation of acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty: necessity of proper centring. Br J Radiol 1975; 48 (568): 259-60.
12. Griffith M J, Seidenstein M K, Williams D, Chamley J. Socket wear in Charnley low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 1978; 137: 37-47.
13. Johnston R C, Fitzgerald R H, Harris W H, Poss R, Muller M E, Sledge C B. Clinical and radiological evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72 (2): 161-8.
14. Kesteris U, Ilchmann T, Wingstrand H, Önnerfalt R. Polyethylene wear in Scanhip arthroplasty with a 22 or 32 mm head: 62 matched patients followed for 7-9 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1996; 67 (2): 125-7.
15. Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72 (4): 518-28.
16. McDonald M D, Bloebaum R D. Distinguishing wear and creep in clinically retrieved polyethylene inserts. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29(1): 1-7.
17. McLaren RH. Prosthetic hip angulation. Radiology 1973; 107 (3): 705-6.
18. Ohlin A, Selvik G. Socket wear assessment. A comparison of three different radiographic methods. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8 (4): 427-31.
19. Rose R M, Nusbaum H J, Schneider H, Ries M, Paul I, Crugnola A, Simon, S R, Radin E L. On the true wear rate of ultra high-molecular-weight polyethylene in the total hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1980; 62 (4): 537-49.
20. Saikko V O, Paavolainen P O, Slatis P. Wear of the polyethylene acetabular cup. Metallic and ceramic heads compared in a hip simulator. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64 (4): 391-402.
21. Scheier H, Sandel J. Wear affecting the plastic cup in metal-plastic endoprosthesis. In: Total hip prosthesis (Eds. Gschwend N G, Debrunner H U). Huber H, Berne 1976; 186-90.
22. Schüller H M, Marti R K. Ten-year socket wear in 66 hip arthroplasties. Ceramic versus metal heads. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61 (3): 240-3.
23. Weber BG. Total hip replacement: rotating versus fixed and metal versus ceramic heads.In: The Hip. Proceedings of the ninth open scientific meeting of The Hip Society (Ed. Salvati EA).The C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis 1981; 14: 264-75.
24. Weber B G, Fiechter T. Polyethylene wear and late loosening of a total prosthesis of the hip joint. New perspectives for metal/metal pairing of the capsule and head. (German). Orthopäde 1989; 18 (5): 370-6.
25. Wroblewski B M. Direction and rate of socket wear in Chamley low-friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1985; 67 (5): 757-61.