Duration of the pharmacodynamic interaction between pancuronium and mivacurium

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 251-252

  Beaussier, M ^a   Deriaz, H ^a   De Traverse, A ^a   Abdelhalim, Z ^a   Lienhart, A ^a  

^a HÔPITAL SAINT ANTOINE   (France)

Author keywords

Antagonists; Neuromuscular block, mivacurium; Neuromuscular block, pancuronium; Recovery

Indexed keywords

MIVACURIUM; PANCURONIUM;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DRUG DOSE; DRUG MECHANISM; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; MALE; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031850577     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/81.2.251     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bevan DR, Smith CE, Donati F. Postoperative neuromuscular blockade: A comparison between atracurium, vecuronium, and pzncuiomum. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:272-276.
2. Erkola O, Rautoma P, Meretoja OA. Mivacurium when preceded by pancuronium becomes a long-acting muscle relaxant. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 562-565.
3. Kirn KS, Shim JC, Kirn DW. Interactions between mivacurium and pancuronium. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1997; 79:19-23.
4. Hull CJ. Pharmacodynamics of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1982; 54: 169-182.
5. Bowman WC, Gibb AJ, Harvey AL, Marshall IG. Prejunctional actions of cholinoceptors agonists and antagonists and of anticholinesterase drugs. In: Kharkevich DA, ed. New neuromuscular blocking agents. Handbook of experimental pharmacology. Vol 79. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1986; 141-170.
6. Waud BE, Waud DR. The relation between tetanic fade and receptor occlusion in the presence of competitive neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology 1971 ; 35:456-459.
7. Duvaldestin P, Saada J, Berger JL, D'Hollander A, Desmonts JM. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and doseresponse relationships of pancuronium in control and elderly subjects. Anesthesiology 1982; 56:36-40.