Large-area mapping of biodiversity

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 34-47

  Scott, J Michael ^a   Jennings, Michael D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031843802     PISSN: 00266493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2991993     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (55)

1. Allen. T. F. & T. B. Starr. 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Theory. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. Bara, T. J. (editor). 1994. Multi-resolution Land Characteristics Consortium Documentation Notebook. EMAP-Lundscape Characterization, EPA Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. See also, the MRLC home page on the World Wide Web at http://www.epa.gov/grd/mrlc.
3. Beardsley, K. & D. M. Stoms. 1993. Compiling a digital map of areas managed for biodiversity in California. Nat. Areas J. 1: 177-190.
4. Bourgeron, P. S. & L. D. Engelking. 1994. A Preliminary Vegetation Classification of the Western United Slates. A report prepared by the Western Heritage Taskforce and The Nature Conservancy for the University of Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. The Nature Conservancy Western Regional Office, Boulder, Colorado.
5. Butterfield, B. R., B. Csuti & J. M. Scott. 1994. Modeling vertebrate distributions for gup analysis. Pp. 53-68 in R. I. Miller (editor), Mapping the Diversity of Nature. Chapman and Hall, London.
6. Caicco, S. L., J. M. Scott, B. Butterfield & B. Csuti. 1995. A gap analysis management status of the vegetation of Idaho. Conservation of Biological Diversity 9: 498-511.
7. Crowe, R. E. 1996. Use of gap analysis in regional planning in southern California. Pp. 221-238 in J. M. Scott, T. H. Tear & F. W. Davis (editors), Gap Analysis, A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland.
8. Crumpacker, D. W., S. W. Hodge, D. Friedley & W. P. Greg, Jr. 1988. A preliminary assessment of the status of major terrestrial and wetland ecosystems of federal and Indian lands in the United States. Conservation Biol. 2(1): 103-115.
9. Davis, F. W. 1995. The nature of gap analysis. Letter. BioScience 46: 74-75.
10. _ & D. M. Stoms. 1996. Geographic Information Systems Analysis of Biodiversity in California. Final report. University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Geography.
11. _, J. E. Estes, B. Csuti, J. M. Seott, D. Stoms, M. Painho, P. Stine, A. Hollander, R. Walker, M. Bueno. C. Cogan & V. Gray. 1991. Geographic Information Systems Analysis of Biodiversity in California. Final Report - Year 1. Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara.
12. _, P. A. Stine, D. M. Stoms, M. I. Borchert & A. D. Hollander. 1995. Gap analysis of the actual vegetation of California: 1. The southwest region. Madroño 42: 40-78.
13. Drake, J. & D. Faber-Langendoen. 1997. An Alliance Level Classification of the Vegetation of the Midwestern United States. A report prepared by The Nature Conservancy Midwest Conservation Science Department for the University of Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. The Nature Conservancy Midwest Regional Office, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
14. Edwards, T. C., Jr. 1995. Data defensibility and gap analysis. Letter. BioScience 46: 74-75.
15. _, C. G. Homer, S. D. Bassett, A. Falconer, R. D. Ramsey & D. W. Wight. 1995. Utah Gap Analysis: An Environmental Information System. Final project report 95-1. Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Utah State University, Logan.
16. _, _, _, A. Falconer, R. D. Ramsey & D. W. Wright. 1996. Adequacy of wildlife habitat relationships models estimating spatial distributions on terrestrial vertebrates. Conservation. Biol. 10: 63-270.
17. Eyre, F. H. (editor). 1980. Forest Cover Types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, D.C.
18. FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee). 1996. FGDC Vegetation Classification and Information Standards. U.S. Geological Survey, MS 590 National Center, Reston, Virginia.
19. _. 1997. FGDC Vegetation Classification and Information Standards. Federal Geographic Data Committee, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
20. Grossman, D., K. L. Goodin, X. Li, C. Wisnewski, D. Faber-Langendoen, M. Anderson, L. Sneddon, D. Allard, M. Gallyoun & A. Weakley. 1994. Standardized National Vegetation Classification System. Report by The Nature Conservancy and Environmental Systems Research Institute for the NBS/NPS Vegetation Mapping Program. National Biological Service, Denver, Colorado.
21. Hawken, P. 1993. The Ecology of Commerce. Harper Collins, New York.
22. Heywood, V. H. (editor). 1995. Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
23. Jennings, M. D. 1993. Natural Terrestrial Cover Classification: Assumptions and Definitions. Gap Analysis Technical Bulletin 2. Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Moscow, Idaho.
24. _. 1995. A confluence of biology, ecology, and geography for the management of biological resources. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 23(4): 658-662.
25. _ & J. M. Scott. 1993. Building a macroseope: How well do places managed for biodiversity match reality? Renewable Resources J. 11: 16-20.
26. _, E. Brackney, P. Crist & R. Sorbel. 1996. Gap Analysis Program 1995 and 1995 Status Report. USGS Gap Analysis Program, Moscow, Idaho.
27. Klopatek, J. M., R. J. Olson, C. J. Emerson & J. C. Jones. 1979. Land-use conflicts with natural vegetation in the United States. Environm. Conservation 6: 191-199.
28. Küchler, A. W. & I. S. Zonneveld (editors). 1988. Vegetation Mapping. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
29. Levin, S. A. 1981. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1942-1968.
30. Lillisand, T. M. 1996. A protocol for satellite-based land cover classification in the upper Midwest. Pp. 103-118 in J. M. Scott, T. H. Tear & F. W. Davis (editors), Gap Analysis, A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland.
31. Loucks, O. L. 1995. Special committee on vegetation classification annual report. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 76: 221-223.
32. _. 1996. 100 years after Colles: A national classification for vegetation. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 77: 75-76.
33. Noss, R. F. & A. Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving Nature's Legacy. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
34. _, T. E. LaRoe III & J. M. Scott. 1995. Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradation. Biol. Rep. 28. U.S. Dept. of the Interior. National Biological Service, Washington, D.C.
35. O'Neill, R. V., D. L. DeAngelis, J. B. Waide & T. F. H. Allen. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Monographs in Population Biology No. 23. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
36. Orians, G. H. 1993. Endangered at what level? Ecol. Applications 20: 206-208.
37. Scott, J. M., B. Csuti, J. D. Jacobi & J. E. Estes. 1987. Species richness: A geographical approach to protecting biodiversity. BioScience 37: 782-788.
38. _, F. Davis, B. Csuti, R. Noss, B. Butterfield, C. Groves, H. Anderson, S. Caicco, F. D'Erchia, T. C. Edwards. Jr., J. Ulliman & G. Wright. 1993. Gap analysis: A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monogr. 123.
39. _, M. D. Jennings, R. G. Wright & B. Csuti. 1995. Landscape approaches to mapping biodiversity. Letter. BioScience 46: 74-75.
40. _, T. H. Tear & F. W. Davis (editors). 1996. Gap Analysis, A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland.
41. Short, H. L. & J. B. Hestbeck. 1995. National biotic resource inventories and GAP analysis. BioScience 45: 535-539.
42. Slaymaker, D. M., K. M. L. Jones, C. R. Griffin & J. T. Finn. 1996. Mapping deciduous forests in southern New England using aerial videography and hyper clustered multitemporal landsat TM imagery. Pp. 87-101 in J. M. Scott. T. H. Tear & F. W. Davis (editors), Gap Analysis, A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland.
43. Sneddon, L., M. Anderson & K. Metzler. 1994. A Classification and Description of Terrestrial Community Alliances in The Nature Conservancy's Eastern Region: First Approximation. A report prepared for the National Gap Analysis Program, Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Idaho, Moscow.
44. Stoms, D. M. 1994. Scale dependence of species richness maps. The Professional Geographer 46: 346-358.
45. _ & J. E. Estes. 1993. A remote sensing research agenda for mapping and monitoring biodiversity. Int. J. Remote Sensing 14: 1839-1860.
46. Tear, T. H., J. M. Scott, P. Hayward & B. Griffith. 1993. Status and prospects for success of the Endangered Species Act: A look al recovery plans. Science 262: 976-977.
47. Thomas, K. A. & F. W. Davis. 1996. Applications of gap analysis data in the Mojave Desert of California. Pp. 209-220 in J. M. Scott, T. H. Tear & F. W. Davis (editors), Gap Analysis, A Landscape Approach to Biodiversity Planning. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland.
48. Vitousek, P. M., C. M. D'Antonio, L. L. Loope & R. West-brooks. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Amer. Sci. 84: 486-478.
49. _, H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco & J. M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science 277: 494-499.
50. Weakley, A. S., K. D. Patterson, S. Landaal & M. Gallyoun. 1996. International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the Southeastern United Stales. Working draft of April 1966. The Nature Conservancy, Southeastern Regional Office, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
51. _, _, _ & _. 1997. An Alliance Level Classification of the Vegetation of the Southeastern United States. A report prepared by The Nature Conservancy Southeastern Regional Office for the University of Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. The Nature Conservancy Southeastern Regional Office, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
52. Whittaker, R. H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains. Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 279-338.
53. _. 1977. Species diversity in land communities. Evol. Biol. 10: 1-67.
54. Wiens, J. A. 1989. The Ecology of Bird Communities. Vol 2. Processes and Variations. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
55. Wright, R. G., J. L. MacCracken & J. Hall. 1994. An ecological evaluation of proposed new conservation areas in Idaho: Evaluating proposed Idaho national parks. Conservation Biol. 8: 207-216.