Yield, flowering, and leaf area index of okra-leaf and normal-leaf cotton isolines

Crop Science

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 643-648

  Heitholt, J J ^a   Meredith Jr , W R ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COTTON; CULTIVAR; FLOWERING; LEAF AREA INDEX; MORPHOLOGY; OKRA; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT GROWTH; UNITED STATES; YIELD;

ABELMOSCHUS; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; HIRSUTUM;

EID: 0031840450     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800030003x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andries, J. A.,J.E. Jones, L.W. Sloane, and J.G. Marshall. 1969. Effects of okra leaf shape on boll rot, yield, and other important characters of upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci. 9:705-710.
2. Bridge, R.R. 1986. Registration of 'DES 119' cotton. Crop Sci. 26:646-647.
3. da Silva, F.P.,F.I.O. Melo, F.J.A.F. Tavora, and F.V. Costa Neto. 1996. Okra leaf and normal cotton isolines with different backgrounds. Braz. J. Genet. 19:453-457.
4. El-Zik, K.M.,and P.M. Thaxton. 1990. Registration of 'Tamcot HQ95' cotton. Crop Sci. 30:1359-1360.
5. Heitholt, J.J. 1993. Cotton boll retention and its relationship to lint yield. Crop Sci. 33:486-490.
6. Heitholt, J.J. 1994. Canopy characteristics associated with deficient and excessive cotton plant population densities. Crop Sci. 34:1291-1297.
7. Heitholt, J.J.,W.R. Meredith, Jr.,and J.R. Williford. 1996. Comparison of cotton genotypes varying in canopy characteristics in 76-cm vs. 102-cm rows. Crop Sci. 36:955-960.
8. Heitholt, J.J.,W.T. Pettigrew, and W.R. Meredith, Jr. 1992. Light interception and lint yield of narrow-row cotton, Crop Sci. 32:728-733.
9. Heitholt, J.J., W.T. Pettigrew, and W.R. Meredith, Jr. 1993. Growth, boll opening rate, and fiber properties of narrow-row cotton. Agron. J. 85:590-594.
10. James, D.,and J.E. Jones. 1985. Effects of leaf and bract isolines on spray penetration and insectieidal efficacy, p. 395-396. In T.C. Nelson and J.M. Brown (ed.) Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., New Orleans, LA. 6-11 Jan. 1985. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
11. Jones, J.E. 1982. The present state of the art and science of cotton breeding for leaf-morphological types, p. 93-99. In J.M. Brown (ed.) Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. Las Vegas, NV. 3-7 Jan. 1982. Natl. Cotton Council of Am., Memphis. TN.
12. Jones, J.E.,W.D. Caldwell, D.T. Bowman, J.W. Brand, A. Coro, J.G. Marshall, D.J. Boquet, R. Hutchinson, W. Aguillard, and D.F. Glower. 1981. Gumbo 500:An improved open-canopy cotton. La. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 114.
13. Jones, J.E.,J.I. Dickson, W. Aguillard, W.D. Caldwell, S.H. Moore, R.L. Hutchinson, and R.L. Rogers. 1991. Registration of 'LA 887' cotton. Crop Sci. 31:1701.
14. Kerby, T.A.,and D.R. Buxton. 1978. Effect of leaf shape and plant population on rate of fruiting position appearance in cotton. Agron. J. 70:535-538.
15. Kerby, T.A.,D.R. Buxton, and K. Matsuda. 1980. Carbon sourcesink relationships within narrow-row cotton canopies. Crop Sci. 20:208-213.
16. Meredith, W.R.,Jr. 1983. Effect of environments and genetic backgrounds on evaluation of cotton isolines. Crop Sci. 23:51-54.
17. Meredith, W.R.,Jr. 1984. Influence of leaf morphology on lint yield of cotton - Enhancement by the sub okra trait. Crop Sci. 24:855-857.
18. Meredith, W.R.,Jr. 1985. Lint yield genotype X environment interaction in upland cotton as influenced by leaf canopy isolines. Crop Sci. 25:509-512.
19. Meredith, W.R.,Jr. 1993. Registration of 'MD51ne' cotton. Crop Sci. 33:1415.
20. Meredith, W.R.,Jr.,and R.R. Bridge. 1977. Registration of nine germplasm lines of nectariless cotton. Crop Sci. 17:189.
21. Meredith, W.R.,Jr.,W.T. Pettigrew, and J.J. Heitholt. 1996. Subokra, semi-smoothness, and nectariless effect on cotton lint yield. Crop Sci. 36:22-25.
22. Meredith, W.R.,Jr.,and R. Wells. 1986. Normal vs. Okra leaf yield interaction in cotton. I. Performance of near-isogenic lines from bulk populations. Crop Sci. 26:219-222.
23. Meredith, W.R.,Jr.,and R. Wells. 1987. Sub okra leaf influence on cotton yield. Crop Sci. 27:47-48.
24. Pettigrew, W.T.,J.J. Heitholt, and K.C. Vaughn. 1993. Gas exchange differences and comparative anatomy among cotton leaf-type isolines, Crop Sci. 33:1295-1299.
25. Thomson, N.J. 1995. Commercial utilisation of the okra leaf mutant of cotton. The Australian experience, p. 393-401. In G.A. Constable and N.W Forrester (ed.) Challenging the future. Proc. World Cotton Res. Conf. I. Brisbane, Queensland. 24-28 Feb. 1994. CSIRO, Australia.
26. Wells, R.,and W.R. Meredith, Jr. 1984. Comparative growth of obsolete and modern cotton cultivars. III. Relationship of yield to observed growth characteristics. Crop Sci. 24:868-872.
27. Wells, R.,and W.R. Meredith, Jr. 1986. Normal vs. okra leaf yield interactions in cotton. II. Analysis of vegetative and reproductive growth. Crop Sci. 26:223-228.
28. Wilson, F.D. 1986. Pink bollworm resistance, lint yield, and lint yield components of okra-leaf cotton in different genetic backgrounds. Crop Sci. 26:1164-1167.
29. Wilson, F.D. 1990. Relative resistance of cotton lines to pink bollworm. Crop Sci. 30:500-504.