A hydroacoustic assessment of fish stocks in the River Trent, England

Fisheries Research

Volumn 35, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 83-90

  Lyons, Jim ^a  

^a ENVIRONMENT AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Freshwater fish stock assessment; Hydroacoustics; River Trent

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC SURVEY; ECHOSOUNDING; FISH STOCK;

UK, ENGLAND, TRENT RIVER;

EID: 0031839704     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-7836(98)00062-9     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Appenzeller A.R., Legett W.C. Bias in hydroacoustic estimates of fish abundance due to acoustic shadowing: evidence from day-night surveys of vertically migrating fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 49:1992;2179-2189.
2. Burczynski J.J., Michaletz P.H., Marrone G.M. Hydroacoustic assessment of the abundance and distribution of rainbow smelt in Lake Oahe. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 7:1987;106-116.
3. Duncan, A., Kubecka, J., 1993. Hydroacoustic Methods of Fish Surveys. National Rivers Authority R&D Note 196, pp. 136.
4. Duncan, A., Kubecka, J., 1995. Acoustic size vs. real size relationships for common species of fish. National Rivers Authority R&D Note 374, pp. 84.
5. Foote K.G. Maintaining precision calibrations with optimal copper spheres. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73:1983;1054-1063.
6. Freon P., Soria M., Mullon C., Gerlotto F. Diurnal variation in fish density estimates during acoustic surveys in relation to spatial distribution and avoidance reaction. Aquatic Living Resour. 6:1993;221-234.
7. McKenzie, D.H., Baker, K.S., Metzger, R.M., Fickeisen, D.H., Skalski, J.R., 1979. The application of fisheries management techniques to assessing impacts: Task 1 Report. US Nucl. Reg. Comm. NUREG/CR-0572, pp. 1-82.
8. Siegel, S., 1956. Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 312.
9. Simrad, 1995. Simrad EY500 Portable Scientific Echosounder Instruction Manual P2473E. Simrad, Horten, Norway.