Selective visual masking in speechreading

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 564-575

  Preminger, Jill E ^a,c,d   Lin, Hwei Bing ^b   Payen, Michel ^b   Levitt, Harry ^b  

^a KEAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Lipreading; Speechreading; Viseme recognition; Visual masking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MASKING; NORMAL HUMAN; SPEECH; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; VISION; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 0031836790     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4103.564     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Benguerel, A.-P., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (1982). Coarticulation effects in lipreading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 600-607.
2. Benoît, C., Guiard-Marigny, T., Le Goff, B., & Adjoudani, A. (1995). Which components of the face do humans and machines best speechread? In D. G. Stork & M. E. Hennecke (Eds.), Speechreading by humans and machines: Models, systems, and applications (pp. 315-328; NATO ASI Series, Vol. 150, Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
3. Cohen, M. M., Walker, R. L., & Massaro, D. W. (1995). Perception of visual speech. In D. G. Stork & M. E. Hennecke (Eds.), Speechreading by humans and machines: Models, systems, and applications (pp. 153-168; NATO ASI Series, Vol. 150, Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
4. Erber, N. P. (1974). Effects of angle, distance, and illumination on visual reception of speech by profoundly deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 99-112.
5. French, N. R., & Steinberg, J. C. (1947). Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 19, 90-119.
6. Greenberg, H. J., & Bode, D. L. (1968). Visual discrimination of consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 861-868.
7. Howell, D. C. (1987). Statistical methods for psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Duxbury Press.
8. Ijsseldijk, F. J. (1992). Speechreading performance under different conditions of video image, repetition, and speech rate. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 466-471.
9. Kricos, P. B., & Lesner, S. A. (1982). Differences in visual intelligibility across talkers. The Volta Review, 84, 219-225.
10. Kricos, P. B., & Lesner, S. A. (1985). Effect of talker differences on the speechreading of hearing-impaired teenagers. The Volta Review, 87, 5-16.
11. Marassa, L. K., & Lansing, C. R. (1995). Visual word recognition in two facial motion conditions: Full-face versus lips-plus-mandible. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1387-1394.
12. Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
13. Owens, E., & Blazek, B. (1985). Visemes observed by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adult viewers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 381-393.
14. Rosenblum, L. D., Johnson, J. A., & Saldaña, H. M. (1996). Point-light facial displays enhance comprehension of speech in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1159-1170.
15. Scheinberg, J. C. (1988). An analysis of /p/, /b/ and /m/ in the speech signal. Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
16. Summerfield, Q., MacLeod, A., McGrath, M., & Brooke, M. (1989). Lips, teeth, and the benefits of lipreading. In A. W. Young & H. D. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing (pp. 223-233). North-Holland: Elsevier Sciences Publishers, B.V.
17. Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., Munhall, K. G., Hirayama, M., Lee, Y. V., & Terzopoulos, D. (1995). The dynamics of audiovisual behavior in speech. In D. G. Stork & M. E. Hennecke (Eds.), Speechreading by humans and machines: Models, systems, and applications (pp. 221-232; NATO ASI Series, Vol. 150, Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.